Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty

Supreme Court Hears Frequent Flyer Case

WASHINGTON (UPI) — The U.S. Supreme Court heard argument Tuesday on when airlines can kick complaining passengers out of frequent flyer programs.

A Minnesota rabbi and lecturer, Binyomin Ginsberg, was a frequent complainer as well as a frequent flyer. He particularly objected to getting stuck in an airliner on the tarmac for hours without an explanation.

His complaints — 24 formal ones in eight months — so irritated Northwest Airlines, now part of Delta Airlines, that the carrier ended his membership in the in the WorldPerks Platinum Elite program in 2008.

The terms of the program specifically said Northwest had “sole discretion” to end someone’s participation for any reason.

Ginsberg filed a class action suit in U.S. District Court seeking $5 million, but a Federal judge dismissed the case. A Federal appeals court reversed, saying his suit was not pre-empted by Federal law.

The 1978 Airline Deregulation Act says States “may not enact or enforce a law, regulation or other provision having the force and effect of law related to a price, route or service of an air carrier.”

The appeals court said Ginsberg’s claims were not categorically related to a price, route or service.

Tuesday, the justices appeared to be split on the issue, USA Today reported.

Conservative Justice Antonin Scalia said the main purpose of the law was to pre-empt suits such as Ginsberg’s, the newspaper reported, and to avoid regulation of airlines by Federal or State government.

Liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg asked whether frequent flyer contracts are “illusory” if a carrier can kick out members “willy nilly,” the report said.

The justices should rule in the case sometime during the next several months.

UPI - United Press International, Inc.

Since 1907, United Press International (UPI) has been a leading provider of critical information to media outlets, businesses, governments and researchers worldwide.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Supreme Court Hears Frequent Flyer Case”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at


Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.