Rand Paul: Obama Speech Unconvincing, Popular Resistance— Not Military Threat— Temporarily Averted Strike


Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) offered a rebuttal Tuesday evening to President Barack Obama’s speech on the possibility of an American strike against the Syrian government, saying that the President failed to convince him that a strike would of any benefit to the American public.

“It didn’t quite convince me,” Paul told on Fox News after the speech. “I think what he needed to lay out for the American public was a compelling American interest or national security interest in Syria.”

Syria, Paul contended, poses no legitimate threat to the United States and “has nothing to do” with U.S. national security.

The Senator didn’t deny that atrocities have been committed by the Syrian government, but was quick to note that Syrian rebels are also guilty of such acts.

“I see no clear ally for America on either side of this civil war,” Paul said.

Paul also refuted the President’s claim that a chemical weapons disarmament deal worked out between Syria and Russia was the result of the threat of U.S. military intervention.

“Some will say that only the threat of force brought Russia and Syria to the negotiating table,” Paul said. “But one thing is for certain. The chance for diplomacy would not have occurred without strong voices against an immediate bombing campaign. If we had simply gone to war last week or the week before, as many advocated, we wouldn’t be looking at a possible solution today.”

Personal Liberty

Sam Rolley

Sam Rolley began a career in journalism working for a small town newspaper while seeking a B.A. in English. After covering community news and politics, Rolley took a position at Personal Liberty Media Group where could better hone his focus on his true passions: national politics and liberty issues. In his daily columns and reports, Rolley works to help readers understand which lies are perpetuated by the mainstream media and to stay on top of issues ignored by more conventional media outlets.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.