Obama Should Extradite Holder To Mexico


Speaking at Mexico’s Anthropology Museum, President Barack Obama blamed Mexico’s gun violence not on drug cartels, but on American guns.

“Most of the guns used to commit violence here in Mexico come from the United States,” he said.

Yeah, and Attorney General Eric Holder has been a major gun trafficker to Mexico with Operation Fast and Furious. Obama failed to mention whether he’d soon be extraditing Holder to Mexico to stand trial, and none of the media covering the event bothered to ask.

Personal Liberty

Bob Livingston

founder of Personal Liberty Digest™, is an ultra-conservative American author and editor of The Bob Livingston Letter™, in circulation since 1969. Bob has devoted much of his life to research and the quest for truth on a variety of subjects. Bob specializes in health issues such as nutritional supplements and alternatives to drugs, as well as issues of privacy (both personal and financial), asset protection and the preservation of freedom.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

  • Dave

    We have the drug war that has failed horribly… All drugs need to be legalized. That reduces Gun violence in this country greatly!
    The cartels get the guns from the United States because of the ease in whi8ch to get them.
    George W Bush worked with the Mexican Gov to battle the cartels with little success. Why? He worked with the Mexican Gov and the Gov tipped off the cartels to what was coming down. (Amazing I know)
    So Obama descides to go around the Mexican Gov to get these people and gets better results by doing so. Part of the equation is guns to track the operations to the bigger players. One of our agents gets killed with one of the guns and the conservatives go nuts because they need something to derail what Obama wants to do (the economy).
    Once again… a phoney outrage.

    • http://personalliberty.com/ Bob Livingston

      Dear Dave,

      You write: “The cartels get the guns from the United States because of the ease in whi8ch to get them.” Please provide evidence of this assertion.

      You write: ” One of our agents gets killed with one of the guns and the
      conservatives go nuts because they need something to derail what Obama wants to do (the economy).” Logical fallacy.

      You write: “Once again… a phoney outrage.” I assure you my outrage is not phony. We have covered it extensively.

      Best wishes,

      • Oh yes, I did.

        Just want to point out that you missed the MORE important details of the speech.

        “I think many of you know that in America, our Constitution guarantees our individual right to bear arms. And as president, I swore an oath to uphold that right, and I always will.”
        “But at the same time, as I’ve said in the United States, I will
        continue to do everything in my power to pass common-sense reforms that keep guns out of the hands of criminals and dangerous people. That can save lives here in Mexico and back home in the United States. It’s the right thing to do,” Obama added.

        But back to cartels easily acquiring weapons. Our Govt sells weapons to the Mexican Govt. Those officials transport those weapons back to Mexico, the cartels find them, kill them, steal those weapons. Following? And it isn’t just guns, it is grenades, rpgs, explosives, etc.

        Logical fallacy. By taking one quote from this speech, a small one mind you, and turning it into an entirely different meaning than what was originally intended is an attempt to derail. He basically said, “I like guns and the 2nd amendment, but common-sense dictates we need better laws to keep criminals away from guns”. How is this NOT the topic being discussed. You would rather turn something minute and irrelevant into a huge debacle, than discuss something that is verifiably more important. You are no better than a photographer trying to catch an actress with a nipple slip. As far as I am concerned, you are no better than the scum paparazzi. Just the same as any other smear reporter. Solo one line in a speech and turn it against the speaker. That is why the ones who don’t like Obama, don’t like Obama. Because people do this. And it doesn’t matter what it is. Obama could say, “I went to the hospital in Boston today. I felt so bad that for the next 2 years, my pay will go directly to help the victims of the Boston bombings.” And the reporters such as yourself would say, “Omg, Obama used tax payer dollars to fly to Boston. Another damn vacation on my dime! I bet him and his little daughters went to a water park and spent all of our money too!”

      • Dave

        I write: You write: “The cartels get the guns from the United States because of the ease in whi8ch to get them.”

        Bob Writes: Please provide evidence of this assertion.

        I respond: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/dec/08/us-guns-mexico-drug-cartels


        I write: ” One of our agents gets killed with one of the guns and the
        conservatives go nuts because they need something to derail what Obama wants to do (the economy).”

        Bob Writes: Logical fallacy

        I respond:

        logical fallacy – a fallacy in logical argumentation

        Lets see if Bob is right here…

        How much effort has been put forth by the GOP on F&F? Hudreds of hours and we have had countless news cycles talking about this issue.
        One could contend that the GOP are using this to keep Obama off balance and off his agenda. What could support that contention?
        1)In the 1990’s the GOP use the IC to investigate Whitewater and when that failed to prove anything the GOP’s IC went after Clinton’s infidelities which magically ended when George W Bush was elected President. The end result was they kept Clinton on the defensive and got their guy into the WH.
        2) Benghazi: 4 Americans die due to lax security at the US which is the fault of the Sec of State ultimately but the GOP continues to beat the drums of a coverup because of statements made by the Ambassador to the UN which ended up being wrong. The GOP have recieved all the information the originally asked for but that is not good enough for the GOP. They do not care as much about making security stronger as they do wanting to expose “something”. Since over 100 Embassy workers were killed by terrorists under Bush and the GOP were strangely quiet about security at the time. It is logical to assume that the GOP have an ulterior motive here.
        The record of the GOP supports making such a case.

        • Did again.

          Amen. They only use a story to bombard Obama until it loses it’s momentum, then suddenly they drop it and they find another story to use. That Benghazi thing is a big example of how the GOP uses a terrible situation to their advantage. 100+ embassy workers dead under Bush, no big deal. 3000 civilians dead on our own soil because our president ignored daily briefings from the CIA warning Bush that bin laden was planning to use American passenger aircraft as missiles, no big deal. 10+ years, pushing 13, of war because of ignoring the direct warning and 100,000s of total civilian deaths, no big deal!!!!! But wait, a democratic black president, and 4 embassy deaths on his watch. Holy [expletive deleted], it’s a cover up! I am pretty sure Bush should still be in the hot seat on 911, should not have been given the library, and should be imprisoned for looking the other way on a 6 month pre warning to 911 (certain people made millions on putting money into certain stocks just before 911, not going into detail on that). But no, these people are to worried about trying everyday to find a new reason to impeach Obama. Guess what fools, it ain’t gonna happen.