MSM Outlets Reject Holder’s Attempt To Control Agenda On Reining In DOJ With ‘Off-Record’ Talks


FOX News, The New York Times, The Associated Press, CBS News, CNN and The Huffington Post all have told Attorney General Eric Holder he can forget about trying to control a dialogue between government and the press, citing an obvious principle that the U.S. Department of Justice has continued to ignore: the media’s power to go about its job without first agreeing to silent and hidden ground rules with that very government on which it purports, at least in theory, to shine a light.

Holder’s farcical proposition — which essentially asks mainstream media outlets with bureaus in Washington, D.C., to join him in off-record discussions over how he can go about investigating himself in the wake of illegal media snooping scandals involving FOX News and The AP — has rightly hit a sour note with nearly all takers. The talks, which will still go on with the few news outfits (ABC, POLITICO) who’ve said “yes,” are set to take place Thursday and Friday.

“We will not be attending the session at DOJ,” The New York Times said flatly. “It isn’t appropriate for us to attend an off the record meeting with the attorney general. Our Washington bureau is aggressively covering the department’s handling of leak investigations at this time.”

FOX News began its own story on the absurd closed-door talks Thursday by simply stating, “Michael Clemente, Fox News‘ executive vice president, decided that Fox News will not attend the off-record talks.”

The Huffington Post also offered a terse rejoinder as part of a larger story: “The Huffington Post’s Washington bureau chief, Ryan Grim, also said the news site would decline an off-the-record meeting.”

And so on with CNN, CBS News and all the rest. It was a nice “I’m Spartacus” moment of open revolt for a mostly liberal press whose influence over Americans’ political opinions continues to decline.

There’s a facile irony to the mainstream media’s newfound indignance over the Barack Obama Administration’s ongoing condescension. It’s not the condescension that’s new; indeed, no President has enjoyed such a malleable and feeble press presence at White House briefings as have Obama and his simpering, petulant press secretary, Jay Carney. And on those pre-scandal occasions when the mainstream press had broken out of its Stockholm-syndrome thrall long enough to complain, it focused on ridiculous tabloid slights like Obama’s media-shunning golf outing with Tiger Woods.

Now that they’ve no choice but to be outraged and now that they’ve been directly targeted by a Presidential Administration that grew a little too comfortable with its clockwork ability to shepherd the White House press corps, the MSM has found religion.

Better late than never. Something still smells about the way the Obama Administration is trying to countenance these scandals — by doggedly attempting to set the terms of how they’ll be talked about, reported on and investigated — and at least a few in the press are starting to wise up in ways that regular Americans can begin to appreciate.

“Obama’s team still doesn’t get it,” wrote National Journal’s Ron Fournier Thursday. “One wonders why the media would trust Holder’s motive given how the administration has conducted itself so far. The most recent case in point: When The New York Times and AP announced that they would not meet with Holder ‘off the record,’ Democratic Party spokesman Brad Woodhouse tweeted that the decision ‘kind of forfeits your right to gripe.’ Well, no — it doesn’t. Woodhouse was treating the media like a political opponent: Attack, distort, and deflect. He probably didn’t realize the Orwellian implications of his wisecrack. Even the liberal ACLU took issue with it…

“…Small things matter in the big picture. Obama might want to ask Holder to explain himself at a town-hall meeting. Not with bureau chiefs, but to the public at large. On the damn record.”

Personal Liberty

Ben Bullard

Reconciling the concept of individual sovereignty with conscientious participation in the modern American political process is a continuing preoccupation for staff writer Ben Bullard. A former community newspaper writer, Bullard has closely observed the manner in which well-meaning small-town politicians and policy makers often accept, unthinkingly, their increasingly marginal role in shaping the quality of their own lives, as well as those of the people whom they serve. He argues that American public policy is plagued by inscrutable and corrupt motives on a national scale, a fundamental problem which individuals, families and communities must strive to solve. This, he argues, can be achieved only as Americans rediscover the principal role each citizen plays in enriching the welfare of our Republic.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

  • NObama_Holder_Reid_Pelosi_2012

    It wouldn’t surprise me that Holder wants these “off the records” meetings so he can manipulate some sort of a verbal or written agreement between the MSM not to report on certain aspects of his own investigation. Thereby, if the MSM breeches the agreement or contract, Holder can hold it over their head and use it as a intimidation threat and threats of federal lawsuits.
    I don’t blame any of these outlets to decline. Holder is trying to manipulate and set them up and put them in a position where they will be incapable to properly investigate and report the truth and facts. Which is nothing new, many of them rarely report the whole truth without some biased anyway.

    • Vigilant

      I suspect he wants to control the coverage of leaks.

  • CatGman

    The DOJ has little to be concerned about with most of the mainstream media. It isn’t as though the media will actually report anything negative about this administration. They are not concerned with the facts, only agenda.

    • ChuckS123

      They have to be careful to not go too far, or they’ll lose more credibility. Also, They may depend a lot on deceiving themselves and tunnel vision – only looking where they’ll find liberalism. Maybe this is breaking through the self-deception.

      One thing I’ve wanted done for a long time is billboards – very good short message and good, easy to remember website, like maybe Then on that website there’d be a picture of a billboard that says “billboard messages.” Click on it and you see many billboards with messages. Some that are actually posted and many others with other issues. That way the person could see the one he’s interested in, and maybe look at others. Billboards would reach many people who normally get no exposure to conservatism.

  • Vigilant

    So the Attorney General of the United States wants the press “to join him in off-record discussions over how he can go about investigating himself…”

    Nice the top lawyer in the US is too obtuse to ask his own legal experts on a course of action. This merely discloses his real agenda.

    He’s obviously desperate. The very pretext for the meeting is so transparent he can’t see it himself.

    Watch for ABC’s coverage vs. the other networks.

  • Leonard W. Giddens Jr.

    Who in the world has ever heard of suck BS? Two sole brothers with the power of these two could not have been anything but the disaster it is. First black president my foot.