Maryland Goes After Guns, Facebook Goes After Your Privacy, You’re Still Not On Disability!?, Mickey D’s Workers Strike In NYC, Even Hispanics Think U.S. Should Enforce Immigration Law: Friday Morning News Roundup 4-5-2013


Here is a collection of some of the stories that Personal Liberty staffers will be keeping an eye on throughout the day. Click the links for the full stories.

  • Yesterday, Connecticut; today, Maryland. The Old Line State has joined the competition to see who can pass the Nation’s most draconian gun-control laws, with the General Assembly approving a by-now predictable bevy of restrictions aping similar laws passed recently in New York and Connecticut. Novel for the Maryland law is this bit of tyranny: Buy a gun, give up your fingerprints.


  • The new Facebook Home app for mobile phones has privacy advocates concerned. Installing the app, which essentially takes over your Android phone’s main screen, could enable the app to surrender just about every move you make on your phone — as well as your GPS-based whereabouts in real time — to Facebook servers. It “destroys any notion of privacy,” warns one tech blogger.


  • The number of Americans now receiving Federal disability benefits hit a record 8.85 million people in March. That’s more people than live in the entire State of Virginia (and 37 others).


  • Employees of fast food restaurants, including McDonald’s, Burger King and Taco Bell, are on strike in New York City, protesting $7.25 hourly wages and leveraging to form a union. For some reason, the walkout was timed to coincide with the day Martin Luther King Jr. was killed amid his ongoing support of a strike organized by Memphis, Tenn., sanitation workers.


  • A new poll conducted by the Center for Immigration Studies reveals that a majority of Hispanics, 53 percent, think the U.S. government has done “too little” to enforce its own laws on immigration.


Check back for updates, news and analysis throughout the day. Like us on Facebook. And follow our improved Twitter feed.

Personal Liberty

Ben Bullard

Reconciling the concept of individual sovereignty with conscientious participation in the modern American political process is a continuing preoccupation for staff writer Ben Bullard. A former community newspaper writer, Bullard has closely observed the manner in which well-meaning small-town politicians and policy makers often accept, unthinkingly, their increasingly marginal role in shaping the quality of their own lives, as well as those of the people whom they serve. He argues that American public policy is plagued by inscrutable and corrupt motives on a national scale, a fundamental problem which individuals, families and communities must strive to solve. This, he argues, can be achieved only as Americans rediscover the principal role each citizen plays in enriching the welfare of our Republic.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

  • Larry Mellette

    It is all for the common good. LMBO If you give up your freedoms for security. You deserve neither. I think Good Ole Ben said it. LOL

  • JimH

    Any “legal” immigrants I talk to resent the Illegals. They went through the effort to come here the right way and don’t like that others take shortcuts.
    Does that make them as bigoted as I’m supposed to be?
    I knew this years before this article. How? you ask. I talked to them and found out.
    It works, try it, really.
    Hey Libs, not bad for a so called bigot like me. Have you tried asking yet?

  • R.F.

    Another gun carrying Sheriff shot to death while eating lunch in his squad car. I guess the saying that the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun actually isn’t all that true. Two state troopers out west shot dead a few months ago during a car stop by a guy with a bigger gun than they had. And the police spokesperson at Sandy Hook noted that if the squad car cops had gotten to the school before the gunman shot himself they (the cops) would have been killed too because he had better weaponry than the cops did. So maybe part of the answer is to restrict who gets to buy Afghanistan grade weapons capable of blowing the heads off of 20 children in a minute or so.

    • JimH

      R.F., What weapons were the police officers shot with?
      Because the police can be ambushed we should give up our guns?
      The spokesman for Sandy Hook, made the assumption the cops would have been killed, because the shooter had better weapons.
      The cops need better weapons. The spokesman should know better than to speculate on something that no one knows how it would have turned out. Can you say agenda?
      You didn’t make the point you tried to make.