Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty
 

Celebrate ‘Bastardized’ Media

February 14, 2013 by  

Celebrate ‘Bastardized’ Media
PHOTOS.COM

Vice President Joe Biden called on the “legitimate news media” Sunday to assist in furthering the President’s gun control agenda. But Biden’s call to action was less a directive for mainstream media to push gun control (as if he needed to ask) than it was a move to discredit any grass-roots information initiatives that have the potential to derail government propaganda.

“We’re counting on all of you, the legitimate news media, to cover these [gun policy] discussions because the truth is that times have changed,” Biden said during a press conference.

The Vice President also added that reports suggesting the Administration wished to take weapons away from gun owners were a “bunch of malarkey.”

Of course, Biden had no reason to beg media to jump on the gun control bandwagon. According to research conducted by the Media Research Center (full disclosure: MRC describes its mission as “holding the liberal media accountable for shamelessly advancing a left-wing agenda, distorting the truth, and vilifying the conservative movement”), analysis of 216 gun policy stories from the nightly news programming of NBC, ABC and CBS showed that coverage from those outlets favored more strident gun laws 8-1. FOX News was not included in the survey.

Here are some of the MRC numbers:

Evening Newscasts Slant 8-to-1 Against Gun Rights

Out of 92 evening news segments, anti-gun news stories outnumbered pro-gun stories by 46 to 6 (with 40 neutral stories), or an almost 8 to 1 ratio.

■ CBS’s Evening News was the most biased in favor of gun control, airing 19 anti-gun stories to only 1 pro-gun segment, with 20 neutral stories. Anti-gun talking heads (42) outnumbered pro-gun talking heads (21) by a 2 to 1 ratio, with 17 neutral soundbites.

■ ABC’s World News wasn’t much better, airing 15 anti-gun segments to just 2 pro-gun segments, with 8 neutral stories. Surprisingly, ABC’s World News did offer a fairer result when it came to soundbites as anti-talking heads (28) almost matched pro-talking heads (27) with 15 being neutral.

■ NBC’s Nightly News offered 12 anti-gun segments and delivered 3 pro-gun segments, with 12 neutral stories. On Nightly News, 51 talking heads supported gun control to just 29 opposed to more regulations, 20 soundbites were neutral.

Suffice it to say, the Vice President would certainly count any of the aforementioned networks in the “legitimate news media category.” Despite already appearing to have fallen in line with the Administration’s agenda, Biden’s call may be part of the reason NBC News programs, as well as MSNBC, CNBC and NBC News Digital, decided to launch a series of special reports called “Flashpoint: Guns in America.” The purpose of the network-wide initiative will be to examine gun violence, gun legislation and gun ownership, according to TVNEWSER.

But with little resistance from mainstream media against the Administration’s gun policy suggestions, why the need for the Vice President’s call to action? Unfortunately, it appears that the assault on the 2nd Amendment from the Administration of Barack Obama is lending itself to a more subtle assault on the 1st Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Despite the efforts of certain mainstream media outlets to further the agenda against the 2nd Amendment, a hearty backlash has been mounted by grass-roots, “fringe,” conservative and conspiratorial (whatever you want to call them) media outlets enabled by the ability to reach mass audiences via the Internet. Perhaps Biden would refer to these subversive and lesser-known outlets as the bastardized news media.

There is no guarantee that information provided by smaller news outlets is provided without political bias, and most of their consumers realize this. The problem for people like Biden is that the more grass-roots journalistic efforts require the information consumer to think critically about the claims made, a far departure from the automatic authority granted to the mainstream “legitimate news media” controlled by a handful of major news networks. The result is the need of statists like Biden to delegitimize those outlets that require thought. Unfortunately, in doing so the Vice President is granting himself the authority to do something that only the Supreme Court has the power to do: define the meaning of “press” in the 1st Amendment.

The Supreme Court has never explicitly defined the Free Press Clause or given any indication of whom or what comprises the “press.” Biden, in his quest to further limit the 2nd Amendment, is attempting to do it for the court by defining the press as “legitimate media” or, more accurately, as those news organizations that bend to the will of the Administration. There should be no expectation that mainstream media outlets would reject to Biden’s attempt to interpret the 1st Amendment; they’re in on it. Traditional media outlets have been trampled by grass-roots media and citizen journalism in recent years. The last power players in the mainstream media world are the biggest, and they will never cede legitimacy to small media organizations offering dissident opinions.

The 1st Amendment will remain intact only as long as the bastardized news media is allowed to continue to exist. But as witnessed in December, when in the wake of the Sandy Hook tragedy Connecticut cops warned that anyone posting so-called “misinformation” on the case was committing a crime, the battle for the airwaves is on.

Yesterday, Obama reportedly issued an executive order that is meant to provide critical infrastructure protections against cyberattack. The order, similar to the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act that was scrapped in Congress after grass-roots media stirred public outcry, promises to grant the government expansive power over the Internet, the portal of uncensored information enabling bastardized media to spread uncensored information.

Oddly enough, the order was actually signed, effective immediately, on Tuesday. The Administration simply asked members of the legitimate media to withhold the information from the public until the day following the State of the Union address. The press complied.

Here’s BuzzFeed’s version of the story, published Wednesday:

The order — setting up new programs aimed at stopping online espionage and terrorism — was already the law of the land, signed by the president. But it was also secret.

The document was “embargoed until delivery of the President’s in the State of the Union address” — despite the fact it had already been signed.

Such embargoes — imposed unilaterally, rather than agreed-upon — are not binding on news organizations, which weigh the urgency of the news against the headache of, for instance, being dropped from the White House’s distribution list. BuzzFeed abided by the embargo, having participated in a background briefing on the move, but thought it appropriate to report on the unusual delay.

The media takeover is in its last and final stages. The last step for the statists is to do away with independent media outlets like Personal Liberty Digest, The New American, Prison Planet and any others not fitting into Biden’s narrow “legitimate news media” category.

This isn’t the first time a government has attempted to obtain a monopoly on all information spread on American soil. The first multipage newspaper in America, Publick Occurrences, Both Forreign and Domestick, was printed by Richard Pierce and edited by Benjamin Harris in Boston on Sept. 25, 1690. The paper promised in the first — and what turned out to be the only — issue of the newspaper to publish “once a month, or, if any Glut of Occurrences happen, oftener.”

British colonial authorities didn’t feel the newspaper was legitimate news media and ordered the paper shut down:

Whereas some have lately presumed to Print and Disperse a Pamphlet, Entitled, Publick Occurrences, both Forreign and Domestick: Boston, Thursday, Septemb. 25th, 1690. Without the least Privity and Countenace of Authority. The Governour and Council having had the perusal of said Pamphlet, and finding that therein contained Reflections of a very high nature: As also sundry doubtful and uncertain Reports, do hereby manifest and declare their high Resentment and Disallowance of said Pamphlet, and Order that the same be Suppressed and called in; strickly forbidden any person or persons for the future to Set forth any thing in Print without License first obtained from those that are or shall be appointed by the Government to grant the same.

Media, it seems, has come full circle in America with Biden’s claim of “malarkey” spread by bastardized news media resembling the British Governor and Council finding “sundry doubtful and uncertain Reports” in Publick Occurrences. There is a reason words and weapons are the first issues covered in the U.S. Constitution: The men who wrote it lived in a time and place where both were outlawed, a time and place they never wanted another American citizen to experience.

Sam Rolley

Staff writer Sam Rolley began a career in journalism working for a small town newspaper while seeking a B.A. in English. After learning about many of the biases present in most modern newsrooms, Rolley became determined to find a position in journalism that would allow him to combat the unsavory image that the news industry has gained. He is dedicated to seeking the truth and exposing the lies disseminated by the mainstream media at the behest of their corporate masters, special interest groups and information gatekeepers.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Celebrate ‘Bastardized’ Media”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • Vicki

    No matter what excuses they try. No matter what statistics they present. The MSM can not defend the self evident truth that

    ~300 Million Americans DIDN’T shoot anyone

    Stop punishing the INNOCENT for the acts of the few.

    Stop it
    Stop it NOW.

  • Warrior

    “bite me” sure has a lot on his plate. When do “we” get to see his “accounting” of “stimulus #1″? Possibly he “delegated” this to another family member. Maybe the “media” could ask?

  • mari

    Hitler would be so proud, Biden wants to use the government-controlled media to promote gun control. Remember that throughout history, evil has always been very well armed!!! The powerless are the sheep lead to the slaughter.

    • flipped54

      The only people being slaughtered are 1st graders, theater goers, college students, military base personnel and shoppers at the mall. And it was done by evil, well armed, bad gun owners, not government. Historically Americans have been empathetic to victims of this type of violence and urged lawmakers to do something about it. Why has this empathy disappeared and replaced by indifference, looking the other way. Most Americans would be well served if we all embrace the truth and not perceived events that “might happen” with no certainty. Our structure of government will never allow a “Hitler type future”. Sort your thoughts carefully and put credibility where it is earned and not given on non-factual assumptions created to produce media ratings and revenue. PLD has been successful to some degree at doing this very thing. All the writers at PLD certainly don’t write articles for the good of ALL Americans and out of the goodness of their hearts. Remember that one of the authors predicted a Romney landslide….he was not at all in touch with the majority of Americans.

      • Dennis48e

        Waco. Ruby Ridge. The many many government experiments on unsuspecting citizens that result in their death or their going insane.

      • Vicki

        flipped54 says:
        “The only people being slaughtered are 1st graders, theater goers, college students, military base personnel and shoppers at the mall.”

        Conveniently all GUN_FREE Zones. (Yes even military bases thanks to President Clinton, President Bush and obama.) (My bad. I dared to blame President Bush for something)

        “And it was done by evil, well armed, bad gun owners, not government.”

        Actually gun possessors. Ownership is often in question. As to government (I presume you meant US Government) I offer Waco, Ruby Ridge and a host of others we may not have heard of.

        flipped54: “Historically Americans have been empathetic to victims of this type of violence and urged lawmakers to do something about it. ”

        And we STILL are. That is why we have urged lawmakers to end GUN-FREE zones. They only get people killed. We have urged lawmakers to stop punishing the ~300 MILLION Americans who didn’t shoot anyone for the acts of a few. When lawmakers responded with liberalized (I bet liberals hate this part) concealed carry permits, crime went down.
        http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials-on-the-right/122012-637844-mass-killers-deterred-by-gun-owners.htm?p=full

      • Alan

        You strike me as a rather naive individual Flipped. A majority of Americans did not reelect Mr. Obama for one thing. It was the majority of those who chose to vote that put him back in office. And if you think this country could never fall under the rule of a despot, well you’ve got another thing coming. Ask all those who have lived under a tyranny and you will find that they themselves never thought it could happen either.

  • charles

    I keep saying it but people just dont get it , its us against them, us being the law abideing citezens against them a corrupt and dillusional out of control govt. To those of you who keep saying exersise your rights and vote them out. What part of there is not enough time dont you get.

  • slaojack

    It’s time to start impeachment proceedings against any politician who swore under oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States who is in favor of attacking and destroying the 2nd ammendment to our Constitution. To hell with these Commie bastards.

  • http://omanuel.wordpress.com/about omanuel

    Climategate was a wake-up call to the public in late November 2009:

    A tyrannical government had taken control of information and society on schedule, perhaps in “1984″ [1] as George Orwell warned, but government scientists were too busy counting grant dollars for confirming the SSM (standard solar model of hydrogen filled stars) to question the motives of their benefactors.

    Almost eight years earlier at a new conference in the Willard Inter-Continental Hotel in Washington, D.C, I warned the public something is seriously wrong with government science. The SSM was obsolete, at best, and perhaps outright deception ["Why the Model of a Hydrogen-filled Sun is Obsolete," 7 Jan 2002] http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0410569v1.pdf

    Since Climategate I went back and examined closely historical events at the end of Second World War (1945-1946) when George Orwell was dying of tuberculosis and frantically writing “1984″ [1], while Fred Hoyle was writing two papers [2] that became the foundation of the SSM.

    http://omanuel.wordpress.com/about/#comment-2204

    Sir Fred Hoyle himself later admitted that:

    _ a.) Fred Hoyle, Sir Arthur Eddington, and all other astronomers/astrophysicists in their circle of acquaintances at Cambridge University believed the the interior of the Sun was mostly iron (Fe) during WWII

    _ b.) Fred Hoyle’s two 1946 papers were adopted without debate or discussion and later became the foundation of the SSM (standard solar model of hydrogen-filled stars).

    Today I seek help finding a different interpretation for those historical events other than the emergence of a tyrannical world government in 1945 that purposely hid the source of energy in Atomic bombs, nuclear reactors, stars and AGN (active galactic nuclei) by promoting the SSM illusion of hydrogen-filled stars.

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10640850/Request_Assistance.pdf

    Your assistance would be appreciated.

    With kind regards,
    Oliver K. Manuel
    Former NASA Principal
    Investigator for Apollo
    http://www.omatumr.com

    [1] George Owrell (Eric Arthur Blair), “Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984)” Secker and Warburg, 1949: http://www.amazon.com/Nineteen-Eighty-Four-Centennial-Edition-George/dp/0452284236

    [2] Fred Hoyle, “The chemical composition of the stars,” Monthly Notices Royal Astronomical Society 106, 255-259 (1946); “The synthesis of elements from hydrogen,” ibid., 343-383 (1946)

  • GRusling

    One glaring error in this article. Constitutionally, an “Executive Order” NEVER becomes the “Law of the Land” because it is nowhere authorized by said Constitution. “Executive orders are nothing more than the directions from the President, to his department heads, on how to enforce LAWS CREATED BY CONGRESS! Congress has created no new law on this subject, so any and all such “Executive orders” are UN-constitutional and illegal by definition. No-one, least of all some news organization (approved or unapproved) is required “BY LAW” to comply with the wishes and dreams of this or any other president…

Bottom
close[X]

Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to PersonalLiberty.com,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.