While Federal Government Says No, Former Surgeon General Comes Out In Support Of Prop 19

4 Shares

While Federal government says no, former Surgeon General comes out in support of Prop 19This November, voters in California will be asked to decide whether or not recreational marijuana use should be legalized, and the proceeds from its sale taxed. While there is still a national debate about the merits of such a move, legalization proponents have received an unexpected boost from an influential former high government official.

Former United States Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders, who served during the Clinton administration, recently told CNN that, in her view, recreational use of marijuana should be legal because the substance is not physically addictive, unlike nicotine and alcohol.

She also stressed the cost of enforcing the current ban, pointing out that "we have the highest number of people in the world being criminalized, many for non-violent crimes related to marijuana," quoted by the news provider.

"We can use our resources so much better," she added.

According to a recent poll conducted by the Public Policy Institute of California, a total of 52 percent of likely voters in the state support the measure, known as Proposition 19.

However, even if the measure passes, its proponents may still face an uphill battle, as U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said last week that the Federal government will continue to "vigorously enforce the controlled substances act." 

Personal Liberty

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to yousoundoff@personalliberty.com by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.