Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty
 

Webs And Roots

June 1, 2011 by  

Webs And Roots

A spider web is a work of art. If you doubt this, gaze upon the freshly made web of a garden spider covered with early morning dew. Each strand is placed purposefully, and its design is almost perfectly symmetrical.

Not so the webs of intrigue that infest government at all levels. Such a web more accurately resembles the roots of a plant that has spent far too long in the same pot. They crisscross, interlock and overlap. They must be followed deep inside the root ball to find their ends. That is where the rot hides.

So it is with the Bilderberg group that meets next week, June 9-12, in St. Moritz, Switzerland.

Members of this secretive organization — which includes the elites in world governance, the richest and highest-placed corporatists and the heads of the largest media conglomerates — would have you believe they meet to discuss old times, share coffee, hit the links and play pinochle. But the idea that such a group would gather to engage in such trivial pursuits is laughable.

What they do is shape policy for the world and chose who will be the next titular head of each country. Some have posited the charges of sexual misconduct charges against International Monetary Fund head Dominique Strauss Kahn could be a result of Bilderberg — or at least the international bankster cartel, which is a part of the whole — machinations. One such article can be read here. Others are out there to be found if one looks.

American Presidential politics is not immune from Bilderberg influence. In fact, most of the U.S. Presidents elected in the past 50 years have either been outright Bilderberg members or, as in the case of Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, were vetted at a Bilderberg conference prior to election.

The Bilderberg group covers all its bases and currently has one of its puppets in the Oval Office. It wants to make sure that continues following the next election cycle. But its Republican horse — Mitt Romney — is no sure bet. In fact, with Romney’s name recognition from his last run and the money he has in his coffers, it’s pretty safe to assume his current support — 17.4 percent, according to the Real Clear Politics average — is about as much as he is going to get.

That’s why you are starting to hear noise about a run by Texas Governor Rick Perry, writes James P. Tucker Jr., on AmericanFreePress.net. Tucker is one of the most diligent and tenacious reporters covering the Bilderberg group. He writes: “Like Clinton, Perry has attended a Bilderberg meeting. In June 2007, Perry attended the Bilderberg confab in Istanbul, Turkey, making the mandatory promise of secrecy and to follow orders. At the time, Perry was chastised in the newly aroused independent press.”

Tucker reminds readers that Perry is a longtime supporter of the NAFTA Superhighway and the North American Union and holds other globalist positions. He calls Perry the Bilderberg ace in the hole.

Perry is touted in the corporate media as a conservative who has been standing firm against an encroaching big government. But a closer look at his roots reveals something far different.

The same is true of other so-called “true conservatives” like Herman Cain and Sarah Palin.

We will analyze the GOP field in depth once it shakes out a bit. But a word of caution: Don’t be too quick to jump on a candidate’s bandwagon just because the corporate media call him or her conservative or point out links to the Tea Party.

The roots must be examined closely. Sometimes, the globalist rot is difficult to spot.

NOTE: Technology can be a wonderful thing. It can also cause headaches. For some of our regular commenters, the latter occurred over the holiday weekend. It’s true that I have asked our moderators to crack down on insulting comments. We have also blacklisted some of the more egregious offenders. In doing so, I’m hoping to foster intelligent debate and discourage ad hominem attacks. This forum is not meant to be an elementary school playground. After all, if you read the comment policy that falls at the end of each article, you will see that we specifically ask you to refrain from name-calling and using profanity and racial slurs. I believe we can disagree without being disagreeable, and I strive to take this tack whenever I respond to viewpoints opposite my own. I don’t think it’s too much to ask others to do the same. We have filters set to catch much of this and moderators to catch the rest. But I believe we became a little lax in policing what made it through the filters. That being said, for some reason the spam filters captured some comments beginning last Friday that were not offensive. So if you posted an innocuous comment and it went to spam, or if you were temporarily blocked from posting, please accept our apologies. Our system is not perfect, but we are working diligently to make it as close to perfect as possible.

 

 

 

 

Bob Livingston

is an ultra-conservative American who has been writing a newsletter since 1969. Bob has devoted much of his life to research and the quest for truth on a variety of subjects. Bob specializes in health issues such as nutritional supplements and alternatives to drugs, as well as issues of privacy (both personal and financial), asset protection and the preservation of freedom.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Webs And Roots”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • Former Walmart person

    Instead of “imagine no liberals”, I say “imagine no elitist rulers”

    • Dan az

      Thank you Bob L for explaining what happened,I was worried their for awhile that Jesse Lee had some how grabbed control of your news letter.Keep up the good work!

    • DaveH

      Who said “imagine no liberals”?

    • EddieW

      Ahhh but how could they put together the one world government without elitest rulers? Obozo, our Liar in Chief is doing everything possible to destroy this nation, to bankrupt it with these wars that are costing 100 BILLION per Month!!! Plus his giveways of huge amounts of cash to cheaters and liars!! Why? gotta break this country up, to build the one world one… Even the Bible predicts the one world government!! It has to be, but not now!!!

      • Carlucci

        I had a discussion with a dear friend this past weekend about world government. This individual is a very strong Christian and knows the Bible backwards and forwards. Apparently, world government has been a concept of weird, twisted rulers since time began. I mentioned that every time the concept comes up in the Bible, it is thwarted by God.
        She agreed, and said the only “world government” that will occur will be when Jesus Christ returns to set up his kingdom on earth.

        • Monarchist

          Exactly correct in my view! The thousand year earthly Kingdom Jesus
          will set up upon his return. Here’s the thing….Satan mimicks what
          God does with an always lieing twist. God told the first couple not
          to eat the friut lest you die! Satan says oh no you wont die! Your eyes will be open and you will be like God. Oops, there’s the fall.
          God says he created everything in a mature form in a short period of
          time. Satan says God didn’t do it….It all happened by pure blind
          chance over billions of years with no guiding force. Everything came
          from nothing and all the incredible simbiotic relationships and fine tuned details fell into place. Hmmm…sounds like nothing is much smarter and creative than we are. At any rate the Good book says there
          will be something like a one ruling power in the end. The son of perdition who rises to power will give power to ten kings to rule over ten regions or kingdoms. I believe the globelist already have these regions figured out. No? The point is that Carlucci is right in my interpitive view and were seeing all this played out right now! Satan is trying his best to set up his world dominance. Trying to duplicate what christ will do only in an evil way! By the way this is why no man can know the hour or day…if a man knew the hour or day Satan would then know as well by getting in that mans head. We can only know the signs of the season. So much for Rapture predictions.
          Which by the way fulfill Jesus prophecy that such people would be declaring such things in the last days!

  • Robin from Arcadia, IN

    Where can one get the true scoop on all the candidates? Our government is so corrupt, which I never would have dreamed in a million years that I would ever even think such a thought. I always thought we were the ‘good guys’. Our leaders no longer fall into that scenario. I want to make an informed decision. I just want facts. Is there such a website?

    • DaveH

      For reasoned analysis, I don’t think one can beat mises.org,
      reason.org, or cato.org
      I know, they’re all Libertarian websites, but there was a reason I was attracted to the Libertarian Party when I was a confused Liberal fresh out of college 35 years ago. They have the most principled, consistent, and logical approach to politics of any Political Party out there — by far.
      Also, Robin watch Judge Napolitano on Fox Business Network, and John Stossel on same.
      Here’s a sample from Mises, which coincidentally is right up the alley of our current topic:
      http://mises.org/daily/5345/In-a-Relationship-and-Its-Complicated

      • eddie47d

        Corporate dishonesty has wrecked havoc on our financial system. They pull strings and allow the corruption to flow into their bank accounts. Ron Paul is one of the few who is willing to take on both big government and corporate elites. He is a welcome distinction between the Republicans and the Democrats.

        • Dan az

          Eddie
          For once we agree!

        • Vicki

          Hi Eddie47d.

          We find ourselves in agreement on something.

      • Robin from Arcadia, IN

        Thank you DaveH… I cannot believe that we are so controlled by the MSM. It is so depressing. I will visit the websites you posted. I just want facts, not opinions or fiction. I do not want to have to listen to mud-slinging. It gets more difficult as time goes by….

      • Mark in LA

        DaveH big L liberatarian dreamer. Thinking that with “free trade” and “free markets” that everybody would be one big happy family. Peace and prosperity will spread throuhout the world and nobody will be able to game the system. He relies on the ridiculous claims made by the Mises Institute about what free trade is.

        Free trade and free markets is cartels, monopolies, and market corners where the rich collude with each other to manipulate the system for themselves. We had a period of free trade and free markets within our own country – the robber baron era where anybody could routinely wipe out any competitor by any means necessary, where stock manipulators could freely use their media access to create bubbles in stocks at will, and where competitors too big to bankrupt each other formed trade organizations to act as monopolies. All of these people routinely had government officials in their pockets.

        Of course, external to our country we realized the stupidity of free trade ideology and used tariffs to build our manufacturing base and cut Britian’s more efficient manufacturers out of the US market – resulting in the US being the worlds manufacturing leader by the turn of the century.

  • Thor

    This is right on target, Bob. I think the American people would be astonished to find out just how long it has been since they voted for a Presidential candidate who had not first been approved by global business interests. It is my suspicion that this is the cause of that sinking and sinister feeling in the recesses of many conscientious minds that they are not voting ‘for’ a candidate; they are voting ‘against’ the other candidate. As for the ‘monitoring,’ any time you get a good thing going, it’s going to attract schills and trolls. Mature, reticent folk with a command of grammar and their emotions do not fall for the ‘troll-bating.’ Keep up the good work.

    • DaveH

      I think it’s safe to say, that if the MSM is pushing a candidate, he/she is probably marching to the Corporate special interest beat. Have you noticed how the pundits, even on Fox News, try their best to ignore Ron Paul?

      • DaveH

        Yet, Ron has polled well against Obama in spite of the fact that he is unknown by many people (again thanks to the biased MSM). Here’s an example:
        http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2012/election_2012_presidential_election/election_2012_barack_obama_42_ron_paul_41

      • PeggyB

        Absolutely correct, DaveH. This is also true of the pied pipers of the “conservative” media,(talk radio etc). This was clearly shown when they marginalized Ron Paul in 2008 just as their “arch enemies” in the MSM did. If they had promoted Dr. Paul to their millions of listeners it would have produced such a groundswell of grassroots support that he could have won the election. Instead, they promoted McCain which, of course, gave us Obama. This factiion of the media is just as dangerous as the MSM. Maybe even more so because of its deceptive nature. They perpetuate the status quo while pretending to oppose it.

        • DaveH

          The Republican leaders don’t want to lose their power and perks any more than do the Democrat leaders. That’s why both try their best to undermine a Small Government guy like Ron.

      • GRusling

        Quite simply, Ron Paul is far too direct and simplistic for most to understand. His vision pierces the fog with such clarity that he goes directly to the problem, ignoring all the window dressing that most are unable to ever get past. That means only a few ever understand what he’s saying and those few comprise his core group of supporters who are loyal to a fault.

        Ron Paul is nothing less than a strict constitutionalist who, given the opportunity would strip our federal government to the bone and restore the dominance of the individual States in our Republic. That would eliminate the “Welfare State” in our society, leaving Washington “movers and shakers” with nothing to use to bribe voters or financiers. The thought terrifies them but they can’t argue with such simple logic so they ignore it. Very few in America REALLY want to eliminate all the “graft” involved in politics, just the part that doesn’t benefit them and/or their circle.

        All who doubt me, try telling the older generation of “Patriots” that “Social Security” in its present form must be eliminated and watch them turn on you with a vengeance!

        It all turns on “don’t kill MY sacred cow” but that is the creature which needs to become extinct in America if we ever hope to recover…

        • DaveH

          So true, GR, but those older folks who think Ron wants to pull the rug out from under them have been mislead:
          http://www.ronpaul.com/2011-04-27/ron-paul-allow-young-people-to-opt-out-of-social-security-and-medicare/

          Government owns 30% of the property in the US. They could sell off assets to keep their obligations to those whose money was forcibly taken from them “for their own good”. And if they reduced the size of Government by at least half, they would also have a positive cash flow which would help them to meet their obligations. Also with much less meddling by Government in the economy, the business people could concentrate on what they do best instead of jumping through endless regulatory hoops, thus the economy would boom.

        • http://?? Joe H.

          GRusling,
          You mention the “Older patriots”. May I inquire as to how old you are?? If you are, say 30, it’s very easy for you to suggest this to people who are 60-65 who have paid into this program since 15 years old like myself. Had I taken just what they collected from me and invested it, at an average interest of 7% I could have a pretty good nest egg. Is it right that I and others like me lose that money so that you can quit paying into it? Had the progressive government kept their hands off the excess that was collected over the years, the system would still be solvent for at least another twenty years or more! so please be careful where you place the blame for the problem. At only 5.00 a week, and believe me it has been more, I would have paid 11,440 into this scam. now you compound interest on just that for 44 years, and I would have quite a few bucks accumulated!!

          • independant thinker

            “Had I taken just what they collected from me and invested it, at an average interest of 7% I could have a pretty good nest egg.”

            Absolutely true Joe. I was saying that 40+ years ago. If I were repaid all I have put into SS over the years with interest compounded over all those years I would be moderately wealthy now.

          • Wyrdwolf

            It may take a little digging but there is a form you can fill out that can get you all you paid in back in one lump sum. Check out the Social Security website in the forms section.

          • Mark in LA

            This is the common lie that all the anti Social Security people trot out to the old coots without even basic math skills. The problem with this nonsense that you would have more today if you invested the money on you own is that you make up fantasy numbers and you don’t use actuarial methods to arrive at you fantasy balance.

            I am 55 but old enough to remenmer that it was Reagan who accelerated Carter’s FICA tax increases in the mid 80′s to pay for his tax cuts for the rich. Prior to Reagan about 4% was taken out for SS. Taking the companies contribution into account you had 8%. Back then there was no 7% interest guranteed, more like 3% from a bank. Don’t pretend you would have done any “investing” with it. How, when discount brokerages did not exist and mutual funds had large initial investments beyond the average small guy?

            Assuming you had the typical salary like my dad’s salary as a foreman during my senior year in college of 18,000 in 1978, 8% is 1440 dollars. If you apply a reasonable risk free return of 5% a year on that till 2008 you get 6225 dollars in your 401K today. Anything before the inflation of the 70′s would look much worse with much smaller salaries and lower rates of return. Remember that the initial tax was 1% (1% on the employer) on the first 3000 dollars or your yearly maximim contribution was 30 dollars. Applying that generous 5% return for 45 years on the 60 total dollars contributed leaves about 540 in your 401K.

            Any actuary would tell you that if you collect even 5 years of SS today, you have collected much more than you put into the system. But Wall Street continues to place the lie out there that if SS was privatized we would all be better off. This is pure nonsense. Wall Street is the ultimate parasite – it produces no real wealth and is generally unecessary. Germany has a small investement banking sector and doesn’t seem to lack for money for new companies and expansion of the old. The only difference is that there are far fewer parasites making a living moving a ticker up and down and cashing in on the changes in the numbers. Far fewer parasites dreaming ways to take simple investments and producing garbage from them.

  • H. Kirk Rainer

    Without naming names of who could (be elected), who will…or who is; Globalization has been occurring for years now–with the effect of further limiting democracies (like ours…) in transition to another form.

    Globalization is not just economic or business (of course); looking closely at our nation, globalization transfers sovereign powers and law (such as a constitution) to centralized….

    And while the most apparent effect of globalization might seem advantageous (as greater buying power of imports), it has enabled trends toward income stablization–resulting in the reduction of personal income for the vast majority.

    Pay close attention to the transfers, trends and transitions too.

    • DaveH

      Please don’t confuse “buying power of imports” with Globalization. We can have Free Markets without centralized or collaborative leadership. As an example, NAFTA, is not Free Trade at all. Free Trade is NOT administered by Government Panels. That concept is an oxymoron promoted by Big Government leaders who will do anything to pull the wool over the citizens eyes.
      If we truly want Free Trade (which is a desirable thing), then we need to get Government out of the marketplace and let the consumers decide which companies survive and which fail.

    • GRusling

      You make a verbal mistake, one which needs to be eliminated from our vocabulary when you say: “with the effect of further limiting democracies (like ours…) in transition to another form.”

      These United States do NOT comprise a “democracy” (never did) and everyone needs to work hard at bringing it back to the discussion of a “REPUBLIC” because that is our salvation. The concept of a “democratic republic” is also an oxymoron, since the one can’t possibly exist within the other. They are two very different forms, the one destructive of individual rights (majority rule) while the other reinforces individual rights (the LAW rules). The perverted “democracy” concept is what allows our Supreme Court to “interpret” our constitution (dumb since that constitution applies “TO” the Supreme Court as it does to all other facets of the federal government) making our “LAWS” so fluid they don’t even resemble “rules” anymore, much less laws.

      A “LAW” is immutable. It’s a constant and cannot change. A “RULE” is flexible, changeable at will by those who made it. That’s why “Progressives” on both the left and the right try so hard to convince everyone our “constitution” is a “living document” designed to to “evolve” over time. Read the Federalist Papers and try to find where ANY of our Founders supported that concept. I dare you.

      Try to find a businessman who would sign a “contract” (that’s what our constitution is) which some unelected “board” could modify at will by “reinterpreting” what some clause means. You’ll be wasting your time because NO-ONE with a lick of sense would ever sign such a contract, and NONE of our Founders were stupid men…

  • http://PersonalLibertyDigest Mary

    Thanks for the informative commentary. I NEVER pin my hopes on a candidate until I have done exhaustive research. It seems that everyone in the spotlight at the moment has a lot of “baggage” that would make him/her a RINO once elected.

    • DaveH

      Try Ron Paul. He has consistently voted against Big Government throughout his 30 years in office:
      http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/

      • TF

        Ron Paul would also like to put us back on a sound financial footing by taking us back to a gold standard or other real backing for out now inflated away dollars.

        • Carlucci

          I believe the first thing Dr. Paul would do is rid our nation of that cancer/parasite known as the Federal Reserve.

          • DaveH

            I hope so. And get us out of the United Nations also.

          • http://?? Joe H.

            Carlucci,
            I am not attempting to evicerate your comment, but I have heard so many people use that phrase “Mr so and so will do this and that if he gets elected. The man who gets elected will only be able to do what congress LETS him! We not only need a man like Dr Paul in office, we need to get control of congress at the same time!!

          • Carlucci

            I absolutely agree with you. That’s why Congress has to be overhauled.
            A good start would be when people understand that they must stop voting for incumbents (except for both Drs. Paul – we absolutely need them).

          • Kate8

            Joe H. – JFK was about to reveal to the American people what the Federal Reserve was planning for us. We know what happened to him.

            But that is what it would take: going before the American people and telling it to us like it is, and offering a plan of action we could participate in. Like sacrificing some of our comforts in order to refrain from doing business with anyone related to their global monopolies, and not banking with any of their banks.

            We could have our own currency, or even local currencies, and have community farms and services.

            This is do-able if we had the leadership. I think we would all be willing to deal with hardship if it meant getting back control of our country.

  • Raggs

    We need to start looking at canidates that have no background information to the likes of obama… If most Americans had known of obamas background we may not be in the poor shape as a country that we find ourselves in now…. That being said obamas passed was intentionally covered up, we need to be wary of anyother possible canidate we the same MO.

  • http://n/a Terry

    It is safe to say that politics runs on money, just like corporations do, and apparently so does the Bilderberg group? For politics one has to have money to pay for campaign activities by those appointed by the Bilderberg group. Or whomever is responsible for appointing “viable” candidates. It used to be Ted Kennedy because once Ted endorsed O, that was Waterloo for the HRC campaign. Are our elections frauds? Not exactly, but they do seem orchestrated, with big time money being the means while the conductor(s) remain unknown. Ted was a very powerful politician and it is unlikely anyone has replaced him? And the sourse of, the mother of all money in America is none other than then fed res. And money is available in copious amounts for both parties, whose Job 1 is to defend and protect the fed res system so all that is needed interest on the National Debt, ND, will keep flowing into politics to enable appointments to continue.

    Notice the current flap is over cutting the deficits, not about reducing the ND. Where the ND, due to the fact there is a fed res, is the real root cause of our deficit spending and heavy tax burden on working people, including union workers. And high unemployment.

    • TF

      Ron Paul again is for the dismanteling of the Federal Reserve who has been inflating away our dollars buying power since the early 1900′s. Everytime anyone mentions Ron Paul both side dismiss him as a kook but he is a true constitutionalist and small government backer.

  • JJM Libertarian

    So how can we root out the conspirators if the truth is not told? Rather than electing people who WANT leadership positions, perhaps we need to DRAFT those who are not actively pursuing the jobs. After all, George Washington did not want to be General or President but he was drafted for both and did a great job!!

    • Kate8

      JJM – Draft someone? Shall we start with you?

  • SKYSKIERS

    PROVING THE QUALIFICATIONS AND ELIGIBILITY OF OUR
    PRESIDENT IS DEFENDING OUR CONSTITUTION!

    THERE IS A SILVER BULLET SOLUTION!

    One constantly hears the phrase “WE DON’T HAVE A SILVER BULLET” to fix the high gas prices, the poor sales in the housing markets, or the economy in general, from Obama and his talking heads in his
    administration.

    I’m a PACC (Patriot American Christian Conservative) and As a PACC, I’d like to point out a “SILVER BULLET SOLUTION” is in our grasp.

    There is no issue as important to every American as their own
    actual, physical safety and wellbeing!

    How safe would any citizen feel if they knew absolutely for certain that the leader or president of their nation; was an illegal alien, and possibly an enemy agent for a foreign government.
    How could any American TRUST such a leader? How could any American feel safe with such a leader?
    Such a leader(an illegal alien)would be a proven LIAR! Such a leader would be a FRAUD. Such a leader would be a criminal!

    SUCH A LEADER WOULD BE INELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT!

    SUCH A LEADER WOULD NOT LEGALLY BE OUR PRESIDENT!!!!

    OBAMACARE WOULD INSTANTLY NOT BE LEGAL, BECAUSE IT WAS SIGNED BY AN ILLEGAL ALIEN!

    THE LAST TWO SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, APPOINTED BY THIS SAME ILLEGAL ALIEN WOULD IMMEDIATELY LOSE THEIR JOBS.

    THE ATTEMPT OF BANNING AMERICANS FROM HAVING AND POSSESSING FIREARMS, BY THE ABUSE OF EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY, WOULD IMMEDIATELY CEASE!

    THE ATTEMPT OF GRANTING AMNESTY AND UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE, PLUS WELFARE (AND VOTING-RIGHTS)TO 15 MILLION ILLEGAL ALIENS; THROUGH THE ABUSE OF EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY WOULD CEASE!

    THE EPA WOULD LOSE IT’S AUTHORITY TO TAX YOU WHEN YOU BREATH, BY EXHALING CARBON DIOXIDE OR RECTALLY EXPELLING GAS. THIS WOULD IMMEDIATELY KILL THE CAP N TRADE FRAUD THAT IS BEING USED TO SKYROCKET THE COST OF AMERICA’S ELECTRICAL SUPPLY!

    ALL OF THE ILLEGAL ALIEN’S CZARS (30-60)WOULD IMMEDIATELY LOSE THEIR JOBS!

    IN FACT EVERY BILL, SIGNED INTO LAW BY THIS ILLEGAL ALIEN CRIMINAL PRESIDENT WOULD IMMEDIATELY BE AS ILLEGAL AS OBAMA IS!

    Even after Obama loses the next election, there will still be liberal democRATS in our congress who will fight tooth and nail to stop the repeal of OBAMACARE AND ALL OF THE OTHER SOCIALIST-COMMUNIST POLICIES THAT THE DEMOCRATS HAVE SUCCEEDED IN RAMMING DOWN THE THROATS OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!

    IT WILL TAKE YEARS (BY THE TEA PARTY PATRIOTS IN CONGRESS) AND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, TO UNDO THE DAMAGE THAT THE DEMOCRATS HAVE SUCCEEDED IN DOING IN JUST THESE LAST TWO!

    BUT WITH OBAMA REVEALED AS A FRAUD AND AN ILLEGAL ALIEN, WHO WAS AIDED AND ABETTED, BY THE DEMOCRATS & THE LIBERAL NET-WORK-NEWS; THERE WILL BE SUCH A PUBLIC OUTRAGE DIRECTED AT THE PEOPLE WHO ALLOWED THIS DANGEROUS FRAUD TO HAPPEN, THAT OBAMA WILL BE FORCED TO RESIGN; OR THE DEMOCRATS WILL BE FORCED TO IMPEACH OBAMA TO SAVE THEIR OWN JOBS!

    WE PACC’S HAVE A SILVER BULLET SOLUTION IN OUR GRASP.
    WE ONLY NEED THE COURAGE TO USE IT!!!!

    WHAT IS THE “SILVER BULLET SOLUTION” YOU MIGHT ASK?

    USE ALL AVAILABLE SPEED & RESOURCES TO PROVE THAT THE
    CURRENT OCCUPANT OF THE WHITE HOUSE IS AN ILLEGAL ALIEN!
    AND THEN FIRE HIM AND JAIL HIM ALONG WITH THOSE WHO MADE
    THIS FRAUD/TREASON POSSIBLE!

    • Dan az

      Skyskiers
      I have been screaming that for along time now but it looks like the only brick wall is the justice dept.Start there and things should start rolling.
      http://libertarianparty.org/platform

  • http://www.freedomformula.us Carolyn Alder

    I read Bob’s article and all of the many great comments. JJM is right-on. The office was to seek for the man, not the man seek for the office.

    The really sad thing is that no one understands the original Electoral College, the ingenious system that the Framers designed for placing only statesmen, not politicians in the office of the Chief Executive. It soon fell to the machinations of party politics.

    I sent Bob Livingston a copy of the “Evolution and Destruction of the Original Electoral College”. I am hoping that Bob will review it and comment on the purpose and benefits of the original Electoral College system.

    It is time that the American people understand this missing piece of the puzzle, to restore freedom and constitutional government, that has remained hidden or rather ignored for over two centuries.

    • Dan az

      Carolyn

      Could you post it here?I would and probably many here would love to read it.

      • GRusling

        Go here: http://heritagetrainingcenter.com/profile/redleif

        Scroll to the bottom of the page and click on the link. It’s in PDF format so you can easily save a copy if you like…

        • Dan az

          Thanks GRusling

          • Dan az

            Wow know wonder there hasn’t been a third party.It’s time to change it back to the first way it was proposed and maybe be can change the corruption of the elections.

  • http://www.grreatproducts.com bud

    what is this about Palin and Cain? You do not seriously believe Palin is in with the rulers of the world?? Do you????

    • Carlucci

      I believe it, because like B.O., Palin came out of nowhere.

      • http://?? Joe H.

        Carlucci,
        If you check, there is quite a bit of history on Palin that isn’t there on BO!! It is also verifyable where BOs isn’t!!

        • Carlucci

          Okay, but she ran with McCain and supported Rick Perry here in Texas for another term as governor. McCain and Perry are both big government RINOs. And you know that old saying – “birds of a feather”….

  • i41

    When people realize most ofthe smucks in the beltway are just a collection of inbred worthless “elitist” over priced colleges that teach consitant failed government meddling programs. The mush brained idiots who never or have every done a damn thing in life except get passing grades and get employed in some government cubicule to produce nothing useful. Every time a person running for office, no matter what party, if they are from the school of hard knocks and if from a college, it should be some state or minor college, will always get my vote. For decades the “harvard type trained” dumb bastards only make more of a mess of everything they get near, and are dumber than a post, at least a post is useful for holding up a barrier fence. Any off the street person could do a better job of running any elected office, than the overpaid pukes we have in office and in the beltway, at any government agency. Since the elitists of both parties and all the media outlets, including several on Fox, hate Palin and Bachman so much, and are always knocking them. Hope one or both run, these 2 women have my support and money, but I’ll definately vote for anyone than the marxist/communist muslim fraud we now have in the WH.

    • http://?? Joe H.

      i41,
      All I can say is AMEN. I agree with your post 100%!!!

  • Jay

    The reality is, that the one’s who truly run our country, the world, are invisible, we never truly see them. It is they, and not our so-called elected officials, wether left or right, that meddle, and impose through monetary coercion and manipulation, destructive policies and alien social abnormalities for the purpose to break the power of this country so as to take it as their possession to do with it what they will. The one’s we can see, elected officials, are merely their puppets! Changing puppets will do no good, but, exposing and destroying the puppet masters must be the starting point if we have any chance of turning this around! Any worthwhile candidate(s) with good patriotic intentions, in possession of plans and policies, that he or she wishes to implement for the good of the people of this country, will be eaten alive if they do not understand, or perceive, the evil and diabolical men and organizations that presently have a stranglehold on our country! Should there be such a candidate(s)? If so, may God be with them!

    • Antonio

      Hey Jay, how are you? I hope all is well. Have you enjoyed my videos?
      Are you understanding them?
      There was once a candidate like that. His name was Kennedy allow an illuminati family he turned agaisnt them. He told the people that governments at all levels should face opposition and that he would not permit their take over while he was in control. You saw what happen to him right?

      • Jay

        Hey Antonio, I’m well. I’m about half way through your video collage. Again, very well done! Thank you for taking the time to create these videos as well as sharing them with us.

  • Antonio

    Bob Livingston,
    Great article thank you for your work. I have supported Perry and voted for him because i thought he was a pretty good governor. He allows for concealed carry and seems to be against everything obama does. Sometimes i think Perry is just talk. Like when he won in 2010 he said that property were unconstitutional and that they(conservatives) were going to stop the property taxes in Texas. Man i was happy but then there hasn’t been anymore talk about it. Another thing i didn’t like was that he did’nt support Arizona when trying to pass sr 1040 he just sat back and waited to see what would happen. the 2 ranches that drug dealers took over and the border why did he do nothing about that??? I am now beginning to believe that it is because he supports the north american union!! They can send swat into peoples homes and gun’em down in cold blood but they cannot send swat to the 2 ranchs to fight drug dealers??? Why, is that swat cannot fight real armed people or is it all about the north american union? My question, if he runs for the big office what good does it do to even vote if we are screwed with or without obama?? And you are right they (elites or illuminati) only allow those who will follow their agenda to run for office; so why vote?

    • Antonio

      i meant (property TAXES were unconstitutional) sorry

  • Antonio

    Carlucci,
    The one world government did not begin at the beginning of time. It all bagan with NIMROD, after the great flood. Your friend is wrong about it starting at the beginning of time. Nimrod was the first ruler on earth to establish a one world order.

  • Ma61

    If most of the members of Congress is already paid for, what do we do to prevent the victory of the NWO,Bildeberg,CFO,bankers and globalist? If the people we elected and trusted to watch us is not doing anything then what is our choice? Considering the fact that Obama entered an illegal war and continue to lie to the American people. The illegal wars with Iraq and Afganistan whose purpose is pure greed and evil. What will it take for the American people to wake up and unite?

  • Charles

    My comment is about your NOTE. You have clearly stated the reason I no longer read the comments. I don’t like the vitriol, regardless of which side it comes from. Attacks do not make a case. Insults do not sway me to the side from which the insult comes. I stop after reading the article.

Bottom
close[X]

Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to PersonalLiberty.com,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.