Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty

U.S. To Court: Prop 8 UnConstitutional

WASHINGTON,(UPI) — The Obama administration Thursday told the U.S. Supreme Court California’s ban on same-sex marriage is unconstitutional.

The administration said the ban in California’s Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection.

The government’s brief said private individuals, “committed gay and lesbian couples, seek the full benefits, obligations, and social recognition conferred by the institution of marriage. California law provides to same-sex couples registered as domestic partners all the legal incidents of marriage, but it nonetheless denies them the designation of marriage allowed to their opposite-sex counterparts.

“Particularly in those circumstances, the exclusion of gay and lesbian couples from marriage does not substantially further any important governmental interest,” the brief said. “Proposition 8 thus violates equal protection.”

In a statement, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said: “In our filing today in Hollingsworth vs. Perry, the government seeks to vindicate the defining constitutional ideal of equal treatment under the law. Throughout history, we have seen the unjust consequences of decisions and policies rooted in discrimination. The issues before the Supreme Court in this case and the [separate] Defense of Marriage Act case are not just important to the tens of thousands Americans who are being denied equal benefits and rights under our laws, but to our Nation as a whole.”

California voters approved Proposition 8, the California Marriage Protection Act, in 2008 with slightly more than 52 percent for, nearly 48 percent against. Prop 8 says in part, “Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.”

A federal judge declared Prop 8 unconstitutional and a three-judge appeals court panel in San Francisco agreed 2-1.

Argument in the U.S. Supreme Court in Hollingsworth vs. Perry is scheduled for March 26. The DOMA challenge is scheduled to be heard the next day.

California Gov. Jerry Brown, when he was state attorney general, refused to defend Prop 8. ProtectMarriage — its sponsor is a state non-profit, California Renewal — is the official proponent of the proposition and has been allowed to defend it in the Supreme Court.

Earlier this week, the California state attorney general’s office filed a brief urging the high court to strike down the ban.

UPI - United Press International, Inc.

Since 1907, United Press International (UPI) has been a leading provider of critical information to media outlets, businesses, governments and researchers worldwide.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “U.S. To Court: Prop 8 UnConstitutional”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at

  • Karolyn


    • Mike in MI

      Boo-oo-oo-ooh x 2 -

      Receptive male homosexuality (damn, I hate using the good word “-sexuality” related to this disgustingly selfish, unconscionably assaultive, viciously dehumanizing fecal function) results in an attack on the immune system and health status and, depending on other behaviors, the mental long-term competence of frequent particpants in the corrupting activity.
      This sort of behavior should be classed as a primary public health menace by the USPHS and declared grounds for incarceration and, you may think it strange, quarantine until the receptive partner(s) can pass blood tests proving their immune systems are competent and they are not primary foci of communicable infections to the general community.
      This is not now, but it will become crucially important to public health when or if social upheaval or goods and services transportation crises develop in our society due to emergency, weather, terrorism or economic catastrophe.


Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.