U.S. Court of Appeals Upholds Individual Mandate

0 Shares
On Wednesday, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate.

On Wednesday, the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the Affordable Care Act’s mandate that nearly all individuals must buy health insurance.  The three-Judge panel, which included two Republican nominees, ruled 2-1 in favor of the law’s Constitutionality.

“The district court held that the minimum coverage provision falls within Congress’s authority under the Commerce Clause for two principal reasons: (1) the provision regulates economic decisions regarding how to pay for health care that have substantial effects on the interstate health care market; and (2) the provision is essential to the Act’s larger regulation of the interstate market for health insurance,” read the Court opinion, drafted by Judge Boyce F. Martin Jr.

“We find that the minimum coverage provision is a valid exercise of legislative power by Congress under the Commerce Clause and therefore affirm the decision of the district court.”

This decision is the first in which a Republican-nominated Judge has ruled in favor of the mandate, according to POLITICO. Judge James L. Graham, a Ronald Reagan nominee, partially dissented, writing: “It is difficult to see what the limits on Congress’s Commerce Clause authority would be” if the mandate were upheld.

The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals covers Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee.

Personal Liberty

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to yousoundoff@personalliberty.com by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.