Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty
 

Terrorism Trial Critics Increasingly Vocal

November 20, 2009 by  

Terrorism trial critics increasingly vocal In the wake of the White House decision to transfer five individuals to New York for trial who are accused of 9/11 attacks, media reports have documented escalating criticism which cuts across party lines.

While most of the initial concerns centered on the issue of national security, recent objections have also included the constitutional rights of the alleged terrorists. For example, Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, who is the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, stated that trying the accused in a civilian court will expand their constitutional rights and may result in more lenient sentences than in a military court.

"The administration should not prioritize the rights of terrorists over the rights of Americans to be safe and secure," he added.

Critics have also voiced their opinion on the Democratic side, with Senator Jim Webb of Virginia pointing to the potential disruption and high costs associated with conducting the trail on U.S. soil.

However, the Obama administration’s decision was praised by civil rights organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union, whose executive director Anthony Romero called it "a huge victory" for the rule of law.

"It would have been an enormous blow to American values if we had tried these defendants in a process riddled with legal problems," he added.

Five Guantanamo prisoners accused on planning the terrorist attacks will stand trial in a civilian court in New York just blocks away from "ground zero."
ADNFCR-1961-ID-19465235-ADNFCR

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to yousoundoff@personalliberty.com by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Terrorism Trial Critics Increasingly Vocal”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • http://modeltrainshc.ning.com/ Stingray SFO (Oath Keeper)

    Trying these terrorists in the US Federal Court system is a farce! The very first motion to be heard will be to dismiss charges based on the violation of their now given ‘civil rights’ as they were never read their Miranda rights. That issue will set them free, IN OUR COUNTRY! This is an abomination of the courts, brought about by the ACLU, who I believe should be read their rights and tried as traitors to our constitution!

    • james graham

      You’re right! And if it’s not thrown out, the motion will be to dismiss because they can not get a fair trial in the US. Because Obama and others have already said publicly that they WILL be found guilty and given the death sentence! Thank you Mr. Obama! Sence Obama has said he is proud to be a muslum maybe he is giveing his brothers a way out! Just a thought.

      • Curtis S

        Either you people can’t keep your lies straight or Fox Opinion News is feeding you a new talking point. At first you went into Afghanistan with your MILITARY and started taking prisoners. The Geneva Conventions didn’t apply because it wasn’t really a war or a declared war or they weren’t really an army (to be honest I can’t remember what BS excuse y’all agreed on). Bah, whatever. You said it wasn’t a military thing, it was a civil thing. Now, you’re all switching sides? They don’t deserve their day in court, in New York? Are you nuts? You drag their sorry butts back to the scene of the crime and let them all plead guilty. Do any of you think that you could find 12 New Yorkers that wouldn’t convict these terrorists? All of you “Christians” that want an eye for an eye, should turn the other cheek and really think this one through. Execution = Martyr. Don’t let these Muslim murderers become heroes in martyrdom, just let them slowly rot in jail for life, and hope that it’s a long life. Yeah, yeah, prison costs money, but you guys are TRILLIONS in debt, what’s another hundred-million or so for a good cause? But whatever, get a grip, grow some balls and get consistent, if it wasn’t a military before then it’s not one now. Try the dirt bags in civil court and get it over with. All you rednecks are constantly whining about your first and second amendment rights… did any of you manage to read all the way to the fifth-amendment? Anyone get to the sixth? Discuss.

        • Joe H.

          Curtis,
          Go back to Canada and fix whats wrong there! These guys are COMBATANTS! They planned a strike on a civilian target but they planned the strike on the pentagon, a military target also! Federal charges of military court take presidence over civilian so tribunal first hang them with a pork blood soaked rope then try them in civilian court in absence!!!!

          • eyeswideopen

            JoeH. You are wrong, they are not soldiers. The Supreme Court ruled that they must be tried and should not be considered soldiers as they did not represent Afghanistan, but a terrorist group of civilians.

          • Joe H.

            Eyes,
            When did the SC decree anything about these animals? They did NOT rule anything on them.

          • Curtis S

            Eyes is right, JoeH wrong again!
            1. Hamdan v Rumsfeld decided June 29, 2006. From Wikipedia… Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 US 557(2006), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that military commissions set up by the Bush administration to try detainees at Guantanamo lack “the power to proceed because its structures and procedures violate both the Uniform Code Military Justice and the four Geneva Conventions signed in 1949.
            JoeH maybe you got this confused with some of Bill O’Reilly’s war on Christmas koolaid?

          • eyeswideopen

            Joe H. I don’t make statements that I can’t back up. Unlike some on this site, I don’t like to look stupid or ignorant. My facts can always be fact checked. Unlike you and the others, I don’t live in a fantasy world, facts are easy to deal with. You should try it sometime. It really is less stressful. But it is fun watching you all twisting in the wind with your lies and misconceptions. Patting each other on the back and trying to make yourselves feel better about the conspiracies you are promoting.

          • Jana

            eyes, you said and I quote, “Joe H. I don’t make statements that I can’t back up. Unlike some on this site, I don’t like to look stupid or ignorant.”

            I say to you, TOO LATE. You do.

        • Jana

          Ahhh, Curtis you are from Canada. I thought you sounded like a Liberal. I know several Canadians and they don’t think like you do. Thank goodness.

        • Joe H.

          Curtis,
          sorry about that I thought you were the one who said he was from Canada. Instead you are from GERMANY???? And you portend to tell US how to solve our problems? See my post to you on the border thread!!!

          • Jana

            German?!!

          • eyeswideopen

            Joe H. if you give them a military tribunal trial, you are treating them like soldiers. Which they are not. They are nothing but terrorists who should be tried in a civil court. Why would you want to elevate them to the status of soldiers? If you do that, when you are trying to capture them, in other countries, you would be declaring war on those countries and they would not be allowed to assist you. International law dictates who we can have extradited. Once we declare Al Quada a legal government entity, those individuals become soldiers. They are nothing but terrorists operating in Afghanistan, they do not represent the government as soldiers. Treat them like soldiers and turn them into martyr’s or treat them like common criminals and disgrace them. Basic fact is they are not soldiers of Afghanistan so they don’t require a military tribunal.

          • Joe H.

            Eyes,
            There is also a classification of enemy combatants!!! That is what I have been calling them all along. Why elevate them to the status of every honest crime free person here in the US? Are you the same as them? Are you contemplating the destruction of the U.S.? See the difference? Or are your eyes not as wide open as your name suggests?

          • eyeswideopen

            JoeH, do yourself a favor and read. You are making stupid statements. Even Wikipedia would help you and your lack of knowledge. Before you jump in and make a statement which is ignorant, just type in subject and let the internet educate you.

          • Joe H.

            Eyes,
            I do read. unlike you I READ EVERY DAY!! You should try it.

    • JeffH

      Why would there even be a trial for someone who has admitted being the mastermind of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, admmited his guilt and asked to be executed? Holder engineered the “Clinton pardon” of Ayers and his lot. Holder’s former law firm has represented over a dozen terrorists in GITMO. Some of Holder’s associates are now working for the AG as prosecuters. Am I the only one that thinks there might be something fishey about all of this? I don’t think so.

      • eyeswideopen

        hey mister, I’m supposed to love my Constitution. You are a fraud. THIS IS A NATION OF LAWS!!!! not men.!!!

        • Joe H.

          Eyes,
          Exactly, this IS a nation of laws. The Pentagon was hit due to the planning of these animals and that is a military target. Therefore they should be classified enemy combatants!!!! In a time of war, if partisans hit enemy troops they are enemy combatants and are tried by the military!!! So I say the Pentagon takes precedence over a civilian target so try them in a military tribunal and hang them with a pig urine soaked rope then try them in a civilian court posthumously!!!!!

          • Curtis S

            JoeH. Wait! Wait! Joe you’re kidding right? You say that because the Pentagon was hit and the Pentagon is a military target then they should be tried in a military court?? Okay, here’s another idea using your tortured logic. One of those planes flew into the World Trade Center and the World Trade Center had a DAYCARE so they should all be tried in FAMILY COURT! If it had been at night they all could have been tried in NIGHT COURT. Wait. Those planes that flew into the Twin Towers disrupted the morning rush hour, maybe they should be tried in TRAFFIC COURT.

          • eyeswideopen

            Curtis, hands clapping, laughing out loud, tears almost flowing. Thanks I needed that. You hit their logic right on the head. They are just trying to find any reason to object to anything that Obama does. They don’t even realize that the Justice Dept does not answer to him. They really have no understanding of the Constitution or how government works. Ignorance is bliss.

    • Jana

      Call your Senator today on whether you want the Senate to vote on whether or not to have a discussion on this Health Care Bill. They are voting on this tomorrow, Sat.the 21st. If they vote yes, it is almost a positive that it will go through.

      • Joe H.

        Jana,
        would you tell the foreigner above that I’m no longer addressing his postsso he should not waste anymore of his time posting me? Thank you and all the rest here who are freedom loving patriots probably should do the same as his posts don’t amount to a hill of beans. aufweidersein!!!(SP)

        • Curtis S

          Yeah!! I win!!

        • eyeswideopen

          Joe, you have to get a girl to speak for you? lol lol

          • Joe H.

            Eyes,
            No I don’t. Like I said above, if you read more you would know that I had told Curtis that I was not reading his posts and he was wasting his time trying to post to me. instead you post me looking like an idiot who has no active thought process at all.

          • eyeswideopen

            Joe, you are similar to kids on a playground. You are an example of why political discourse doesn’t work. Instead of civil arguements you just shut down.

    • LauraMaeRN

      I think it is REDICULOUS to bring these enemies to civil court? OMG, they ARE NOT CITIZENS! I am disgusted at Obama! And he has the support of the ACLU! I have no respect for them either…Obama is a muslim and the whole world knows it excepts our ignorant Left wingers who want his AGENDA, he does NOTHING for our AMERICAN BLACK COMMUNITY, it is ALL ABOUT THE MUSLIMS !! How can our ONCE great nation STAND for this !!!

  • Disgusted

    This is a Military Issue not Civil Issue. They should not be tried in a civilian court. This is a mistake by the Obama Admnistration. Just add one more!

    • Curtis S

      Review the Supreme Court ruling (remember the majority of the bench are Republican appointees) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld

      • eyeswideopen

        Curtis, nay, the majority are Republicans? This group will deny that. Don’t you remember that the Democrat run everything and own everything? Have you lost your mind? lmao….

        • Jana

          Eyes, Finally you got it right.

        • Jana

          That the Radical Dems run everything, own everything and ruin everything.

          • eyeswideopen

            Jana, if they have all that power, you might as well pack up and leave, as you don’t have a chance of gaining power. Silly, silly idea.

  • Warriors

    This will finally show Al Quada we mean business!

    • marvin

      so you think that spending millions up on millions of dollars to try a non citizen,s in federal court is showing we mean business so from now on we just put a war prisoner on a plane and send them to new york for a trial no interagration the way i see it dead men tell nothing have no trials and no liberals to give them rights they do not have

      • marvin

        if any one here thinks that holder tuck it on himself to bring the 5 terrorist here to federal court and obama had nothing to do with it i have that pot of gold at the end of the rainbow for you thats like napolitano saying that their are fewer illegals crossing are borders like joe wilson said you lie i say it just a ploy

      • Joe H.

        Marvin,
        I think warrior is doing a little satire!!! I don’t think ANYONE here believes that!!!!

        • Warriors

          Very astute observation Joe. My wife thinks my supposed obsession with Barak and his cronies has robbed me of humor. Not so. Being a resident of Chi-town for many years has enlightened me about the democratic party and how to build a good solid base of patronage that will keep dems in office for eternity. Same thing is going on with the fed government right now. Health Care – we’ll nationalize it and just think of all the good little dems we can create to manage it and we’ll let them unionize for good measure (must keep those contributions coming). Terrorist – no problem, we’ll just haul em into civil court and show the american people what dastardly creatures those republicans are. When we’re done, they’ll never vote repub again.

          • Joe H.

            warriors,
            I think this one will backfire on them to a fervor never seen before. New York can’t be expected to keep calm forever!

          • Joe H.

            Warriors,
            Sometimes you just HAVE TO laugh about the crap or go nuts!!!!

          • eyeswideopen

            Warriors, your name really says it all. Nay, I say put the same Republicans back into power, as now we know exactly what will happen and can be prepared to have the economy crash and going broke trying to pay for wars and medicare that weren’t funded. I say, bring em all back, let’s go to hell fast as we can.

          • Jana

            eyes, look around and open your eyes and see what’s happening.
            All of what you are afraid will happen with the Republicans is happening right now with your party in office. Your Obama is making a mess of things and you are blindly following.

          • eyeswideopen

            Jana, sweetheart, I am a Republican, one of the few who still admit it. I also can admit that my party spent money like the drunken sailor. We didn’t fund either war or Medicare Advantage. How responsible was that? I really thought cutting taxes while being actively involved in two wars was treasonous. We are now trying to pay for that bone head move. Yes, I am a Republican, and belong to the group that will not just vote for the party because we are repubs. Some of us actually are grown ups willing to be accountable for our actions. Did you ever complain to anyone during our reign of terror and non discriminatory spending?

          • Joe H.

            Eyes,
            yup we can go broke that way or we can go broke paying for a health care bill that will never be as “budget neutral” as they would have us believe. Or we can go broke by letting all the jobs leave the U.S. because of cap and tax. At least that will bankrupt your social security!!!! No jobs equals nobody paying into your social security account after you retire and good bye medicare also with that!!!!

          • Jana

            eyes sweetie, you don’t sound like a Republican. You sound like an extreme leftist.
            You bet I complained. I wrote letters to President Bush, to my Senators, Letters to the Editors, and on line groups. I backed it up with my votes.
            I was also aware of what was going on in the lending institutions with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. That hurt us just as bad as the wars did. In fact I worked very hard to get out of debt because I could see the writing on the wall. My husband worked hard, and I worked hard both of us putting in many 12 to 15 hour days.
            My point is, my eyes are open to the truth about this President too. I can see where he is taking us, and I don’t like it. He is worse than any President we have ever had, even worse than Carter and that takes some doing! He is an extreme Leftist and surrounds himself with highly questionable characters.
            You say some of us are grown ups willing to be accountable for our actions. Yes maam, we sure are. How about you? When are you going to start?

      • eyeswideopen

        Marvin, you need to read our Constitution, our founding fathers were much smarter than you, and provided law that has withstood people trying to hijack it for over 233 years. When you get your law degree and specialize in Constitutional law, come back and let the knowledge flow. Until then, you might want to conside that even some people not in the U.S. know more about our laws than you do.

        • Joe H.

          Eyes,
          I swear you need to change your name. The constitution has been trampled on so many times it isn’t funny. Your own party has tried to determine it is a “living” document and it changes with the times so which is it lady? Does it change or does it stand? You talk out both sides of your mouth at the same time!!!

          • Joe H.

            Oh, and by the way, eyes,
            you are about as republican as I am ruler of the world. you have done nothing but build up O-man and cut down the republican party here. You are a dyed in the wool libbie!!! Hows that lying, and bull doing for ya, sweetie???

        • Jana

          Wow eyes, and where does the not judging part come in for you. You aren’t following your own beliefs.

          • Jana

            eyes, I found this in another post.

            eyeswideopen says:
            November 20, 2009 at 12:11 am

            and not passing judgement on others. That is reserved for God, not us.

          • eyeswideopen

            Jana, you are so innocent it hurts to have to say this. You obviously didn’t read the posts I was responding too. We were discussing religion and the fact that the Republicans don’t believe that the Democrats are Christians. You can judge others actions to decide if they are something that you want to condone or pursue, however you cannot pass judgement on others. Do you understand the difference? Probably not. Idea being that only God will or can pass judgement on us for our actions, someone like Joe H is not and has not been given the authority by God to decide if someone is a Christian or not. Taking the statement out of content is another of your Radical Conservative ploys.

  • Kitty

    It’s totally unrealistic to have a military trial turned into a civilian trial. How about having their trial at Gitmo–no danger to citizens. Less expensive as well.

    • eyeswideopen

      Killy, I must have missed it. When did one of the convicted terrorists escape from our Federal facility? I must have missed it. Which one of the 195 that we convicted got loose? Please tell me.

      • Jana

        eyes, sweetie, you have missed a lot of things, mostly the point of it all. You are clueless, and no amount of our explaining will help. You won’t read it and all you want to do is argue.

        • eyeswideopen

          darling, if you were correct, there would be no room to argue. However, you are a (word removed for offensive content) just following the new Republican leaders, Rush, Becko, Palin, Gingrich, you know all those non voting, non office holding wacko’s, who are running the party into the ground. Best of Luck. Why don’t you try going to a liberal site and spew your theories and see what response you get? Oh, that’s right, you guys don’t want to try and effect change, you just want a bunch of buddies who can all complain and agree with all of your narrow minded viewpoints that one person is responsible for all of the bad things happening in this country. Nobody told me that republicans have not held office for 12 years, sorry I missed that.

          • Joe H.

            Eyes Dahlink!
            I must have missed it! Where did she say one escaped???? Dear, dear eyes, do pay attention!!!!

          • Jana

            Oh Eyes, are you getting mad?? Now you have fallen back to judging Marvin, and losing your temper. hmmm.

            When I see the illogical views of you and some of your friends on here, I know that going to these Liberal sites would do no good.

            You know it might help you to actually listen to some of these people like Hannity and Beck and Rush and there are several others. You might truly learn something, oh I’m sorry, I shouldn’t have said that. I know that it just isn’t possible for you to have an open mind, you have kept it closed for so long.

            I bet you voted for Obama. You sure talk like you did. Just like you say you are a Republican but why? Why would you be a Republican since you hate them so much? This makes no sense.

            But, for you that is par for the course.

          • Curtis S

            … isn’t it ironic that “ditto head” keeps getting removed?

          • Joe H.

            Eyes,
            Please hon, work on your math!!!! 4+4 =8 not 12!!1 3 terms ago was clintoon!!! Another loonie lib!!!

          • eyeswideopen

            Joe, do you know what the word facetious means? You obviously don’t recognize it, when it is used. Get a grip. You need to read more.

          • eyeswideopen

            Jana, darling, you are too immature and not political savvy to understand me or my political beliefs or that fact that some Republicans are willing to admit that we made mistakes and are responsible for the present fiscal crisis. We know that it doesn’t demean us to man up and be accountable for our legislators who didn’t adhere to the Republican platform, it makes us grown ups. You are the type if caught making a mistake, you would try to weasal out of it, by blaming others, never holding yourself accountable. You would just keep chanting, oh that was in the past, let’s just deal with right now. The guilty never want to look to the past and learn.

          • eyeswideopen

            Joe, your stupidity just shined through. You aren’t even smart enough to realize that the Republicans had control of the House and Senate during Clintons administration. That is absoutely the funniest thing. Do you know how to add? Darling the Repubs got elected in 1994 were sworn in, in 1995. The Dems got elected in 2006, sworn in 2007. Can you add and subtract? 2007-1995 = total years of control of both houses of the Congress. You are needing some history lessons. Go to this link and you will find I am correct. http://uspolitics.about.com/od/usgovernment/l/bl_party_division_2.htm

        • libertytrain

          Jana – a truer statement could not have been said – she does so much twisting and only argumentative – not ever contributing anything worthwhile just incredible anger -

          • Joe H.

            Libertytrain,
            She may be eyeswideopen but she is holding them so shut she could be around a welder without any danger!!!

          • eyeswideopen

            Libertytrain, you are wrong. You just don’t like it that I am right most of the time and have facts to back it up. Grow up, babe, and take accountability for your voting record, you helped put all those Repubs in office that hijacked the Constitution and Passed Medicare Advantage without funding it. Yes, you did. Because we all know that you never would vote for a Dem. Oh, here comes the famous line, I voted for Independents or Libertarians who didn’t get in office. Only question I have, is then how did all those Repubs get in office?.

          • libertytrain

            eyes – I think the only one who thinks you are always right, is you – differing opinions doesn’t make one right, just differing opinions – but if you need to feel you are right all the time about everything, go for it … seems it’s what you need to do – I stopped thinking the way you do when I was about 12 – And you are the one who claims to be a Republican – I haven’t made too many claims on who I am – other than I paint and grew up with and am still too often, surrounded by the leftist force – and from their style – so similar to yours – realized it was pointless to do much with them – they are like you “always right” – and have to be – so I’ll think my thoughts, make my own decisions but can promise you, your opinion means nothing – simply because of the way you present yourself -

          • eyeswideopen

            Liberty, when I first started on this site, the attacks were such an offensive mess, that I made a decision to respond in kind to the way these people were. I didn’t call people names, like troll, etc.. until recently, and I decided maybe a little of their own medicine would enlighten them in the way that they were acting. I was nice and considerate for about 6 weeks, but then all of you decided that since I wasn’t following the Conservative party line like the rest do, that I must be a liberal. At that point I decided that you have enough people attacking the liberals and the President, so I would play devils advocate and present the other side of the arguement, to make you all see how ridiculous some of your rantings and ravings were. The sad thing is that this site just shows how the Republican party is narrowing it’s membership and going to the far radical right. Most people in this country are really Independent or moderate in their belief’s combining some of the liberal ideas with their conservative ones. Most of those on this site don’t allow for anything other than blind obedience to the party. You better not stray as you will be treated and branded as a foreigner, non-Christian, who doesn’t work for a living, must be taking welfare,anti-American who should leave this country. Now if that is what you consider to be a great way to portray your opinions and represents the party, more power to you, and I am glad I discovered what the party truly is all about. Check out the new litmus test for the Republican party, even President Regan wouldn’t have been allowed to be in the party as he failed the test. He only passed in 6 of the 10 items.

  • richeyrich

    Let’s see what the ACLU has to say when the terrorists (could possibly) strike our country AGAIN when this trial is going on. ACLU needs to wake up and smell the coffee. Who cares about these terroists rights? I know I don’t.

    • Joe H.

      libertytrain,
      She is a legend in her own MIND!!!! She teams up with a know nothing foreigner and tries her best to compete yet she is such a loser!!! Might be he is her alter ego!!!

      • libertytrain

        unfortunately her immense ego is her biggest problem -

  • MW

    On this day in 1945, 24 Nazi war criminals went on trial in Nuremburg,
    Germany for the atrocities they committed. As many of you know, it was
    done before a military tribunal. They were not brought to the U.S. to be tried in a federal court. (You could have imagined the outrage!). This coming trial is a disgrace to WW2 veterans in particular & the American people in general, with a few exceptions. Enough said, anger
    prohibts me from saying more!

    • Warriors

      Only because they didn’t have big comfy jumbo jets back then to transport war criminals.

    • Curtis S

      1. Don’t forget that the US declared war on Germany on December 11, 1941, it wasn’t a Joint Resolution.
      2. Review the Supreme Court ruling (remember the majority of the bench are Republican appointees) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld
      3. Let your judicial system work, it’s what the veterans risked their lives to fight for.
      4. Learn to relax a bit, it’s healthier.

      • Joe H.

        Curtis,
        Yeah, they declared war, right after Hitler started to kill about 6 million Jews, but then maybe you think that’s alright? He also killed hungarians,Russians, Italians, French, and a whole lot more civilians too!!! Or are you like IMADINNERJACKET and say it never happened?

        • eyeswideopen

          Joe, you do know that Hilter was killing people prior to the Japanese attacking us don’t you? We knew that the killing was going on, but we were trying to avoid war at all costs. We didn’t act like good Christians and try to stop him. We were watching out for our own butts. The point is the terrorists are not soldiers.

          • Joe H.

            Eyes,
            Please dear let the nice man reply for himself, o.k.?

          • Jana

            No eyes, thats not true. We had so many cotton pickin pacifists that like you that did not want to go to war for any reason that they had to wait till we got attacked ourselves to get into this war.

          • eyeswideopen

            Joe, you told Jana, to tell Curtis, that you wouldn’t be speaking to him. I only answered as I figured that Curtis couldn’t be bothered answering you. Is there a new rule about only responding to those who ask you a question? Didn’t see that anywhere and since you jump into many conversations, I did the same. Oh, that’s right, only the conservatives know the rules and can change them at any time.

          • eyeswideopen

            Jana, you are lacking in war knowledge. You need to check the history of Taxes, and you will see that we increased the tax base to get ready to enter the war prior to being attacked. We were however trying to stay out as long as possible, as we didn’t have enough to fund our military. It had nothing to do with pacification.

        • Curtis S

          Joe H, I’ll let you in on a little secret, World War II started in September 1939! That’s more than TWO years BEFORE you figured out that Hitler was bad. Britain, France, Australia and New Zealand declared war September 3rd. Within a week South Africa and Canada, had declared war too. Even the USSR got into the war half a year BEFORE the U.S. Where were the Americans? The US where Joseph Kennedy Sr. was telling everyone that Hitler was a good guy. The very same US where Prescott Bush (the father and grandfather of US presidents) worked with the financiers of the Nazi war machine. While men were fighting and dying to stop the Nazis, for OVER two years where was the US?? But I’ll give you credit, you only stood on the side-lines for two years, unlike World War I where the US waited THREE years before showing-up. Sorry the only question I’ve ever had about both World Wars was were the he!! were the Americans and what took so long???

          • Jana

            Curtis, again I repeat we had so many pacifists that we had to wait till we were attacked ourselves to even get into the war. This is what is happening again, pacifism.

          • Curtis S

            Sorry Jana… I’m tired, I might be missing something, but I don’t see the parallel.

          • Curtis S

            Nevermind, I get it.

    • eyeswideopen

      MW. the reason they were tried in a military court is because they were soldiers of the countries a war. The terrorists are not soldiers. They are civilians who are criminals. They are not part of the Afghanistan government. Can you grasp that fact? Non soldier, means civil courts.

      • Joe H.

        Dear, Dear Eyes,
        Can you say enemy combatants? You know like partisans in the war?

        • Jana

          No Joe, she can’t. Her eyes, ears, and mind are closed to truth and common sense.

        • Curtis S

          Stop with the “enemy combatants” made-up nonsense. Review the Supreme Court ruling (remember the majority of the bench are Republican appointees) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamdan_v._Rumsfeld

        • Curtis S

          Go to wikipedia and you’ll find that the current definition of enemy combatants was conveniently created in November 2001. The US was the ONLY country in the world that used the term. Go to wikipedia, enter “enemy combatants” a read all about it. (ie. How you’re wrong or deluded or how you’ve swallowed the Fox News koolaid.)

          • Jana

            Curtis
            In the first place I don’t care what wikipedia says. I have no intentions of being led around by the nose into this “politically correct” stupidity that has also come about a few years after the term of enemy combatant.

            All that is good for is controlling the speech of the citizens of this country which will mean eventually controlling their minds and thoughts. If we can’t say it we might as well not think it, and everyone just follows the leader like sheep. Also, our children would never hear the truth since we are not allowed to say it out loud.

            Common sense (if you are at all familiar with that term) says, that any one who is not for us and wants to harm us and kill us would be our enemy.
            The dictionary which is still used in our culture says:
            ‘Enemy: 1)a person who hates another and wishes to injure him.
            2)a nation hostile to another, a soldier, citizen, etc. of a hostile nation.

            Combat: to fight, struggle, battle conflict.

            Therefore an enemy comabatant fits perfectly. These men are citizens of various nations and they want to control the whole ME, as well as us. What they don’t like is, we stand in their way. They are running over their country’s and forcing their radical ideas on their people, and they want to force these same radical ideologies on to us.

            You bet I listen to Fox news. No matter how hard you try to put them down, they do tell it like it is. Just because you refuse to see things as they really are is not their fault. They put the truth out for people who care to know the truth, so it can be seen. If we were to listen to only the Liberal News, we would be blinded by half truths as they see it. So when Fox puts out the news like they see it you liberals call them names and try to discredit them. All this from the supposedly ‘tolerant’ side,

          • eyeswideopen

            Curtis, JANA DOESN’T CARE ABOUT THE FACTS, SHE HAS NO INTENTION OF CHANGING OR ALLOWING HERSELF TO DIGEST FACTS. SHE WON’T ACCEPT ANYTHING BUT THE GOSPEL OF BECK, RUSH OR O’REILY. SHE STAMPED HER FOOT IN DEFINANCE AND STATED THAT SHE DIDN’T CARE WHAT THE FACTS WERE. LMAO,,,, HOWLING WITH LAUGHTER, AND PRINTING THIS TO SHOW OTHERS!!!!!! Good attempt you made, but it is like dealing with insolent children.

          • eyeswideopen

            JANA, THANK GOD, WE HAVE THE SUPREME COURT TO SAVE US FROM PEOPLE LIKE YOU. Don’t believe wikipedia, read the court records and see that you are wrong for yourself. You want to manipulate the Constitution,for your own emotional satisfaction but guess what, intelligent people are the ones guarding from the ilk like you.

          • Jana

            Wow eyes, you are losing your temper more and more and showing off your own inept ability to live by your own standards.
            Never mind that, Socialists don’t have high standards anyway. You are a typical Socialist in that you want to control everything and everyone. You are the only one right, its just got to be your way. You are scared to death that people are starting to wake up and see the truth.
            You represent the leftist and Socialist party very very well.
            You claim we don’t read facts. When truth is given to you you can’t see it. Your rage on this site shows someone who is out of control, and full of bitterness.
            I feel sorry for you, I really do.

          • libertytrain

            Jana – you got her figured out correctly.

          • Joe H.

            Jana,
            Eyes doesn’t realize or even quite possibly doesn’t know that wikipedia isa liberal site funded by liberals. She should check these things before she posts as it making her look almost helpless!!!

          • eyeswideopen

            Joe, every site that proves you and your ilk wrong, you deem to be a liberal site. You are too funny for words. Wikipedia, was deemed to be non partisian by your party, you nut case. You guys need to get together and get on the same page. I started using wikipedia for my info to share with you radicals as that was guoted by your leaders, to be an honest, independent and non-partisian site. I should have known that if it proves you wrong, you will immediately call it a liberal site. What are the non-liberal sites for reference material? Oh, that’s right the whole internet is controled by the rich democrats and there are no sites which aren’t liberal, except the Libertarian sites of Cato. LMAO,,,,SERIOUSLY LAUGHING SO HARD, TEARS ARE FLOWING.

  • Ron

    I agree with James Graham above. Obama and his Attorney General both have said publically that these criminals will be found guilty and be sentenced to death. How do they know, or isn’t this just a way for Obama and his hencemen to give the defense enough amunition to have a pre-trial motion to free the Muslim killers because of pre-trial publicity ? Obama nor any of his administration care one iota about the U. S., it citizens or its laws, they are all bigger criminals than the men who are being put on trial.

    • Joe H.

      Jana,
      Ignore the foreign idiot hon, he doesn’t even belong on this site!!!

      • eyeswideopen

        Joe, where does it say that you have to be a Conservative to participate? You are something else. What happened to freedom of speech, thought, you know, those things your party is supposed to hold in high esteem? You are all hypocritical minons trying to subvert the Constitution and can’t support your illogical theories, so you don’t want anyone to speak…. HA HA. You live your lives in fear. Sad, very sad.

        • Jana

          Eyes, That’s what we were wondering. Whatever happened to freedom of speech? You are trying to force us to conform to your way of thinking and if we don’t you call us names, you judge harshly, and you are the one being hypocritical.
          You are starting to rant and rave more and more making less sense each step of the way.
          I now know why you call it our party, because you are a Socialist.

          You are the one living in fear and confusion. Yes it is sad, very sad indeed.

          • libertytrain

            Jana – again, you are correct.

          • Joe H.

            Jana,
            Unlike eyes, I am able to admit I have called names a few times but ONLY after the libs here have started with me and I return what I get!!!

          • eyeswideopen

            Joe, you are so full of crap, you can’t even admit that you have started the name calling prior to anyone calling you a name. Mr. Denial…DENY, DENY, DENY. and no I don’t raise puppies, were your parents married? Hey liberty, how did you like how Joe portrayed himself by referring to me as a b itch? Classy, don’t you think? And Liberty you say I don’t portray my opinions well?

  • s c

    What comrade obama and his warped-out legions want is to render EVERYONE on the planet automatic US citizens. In the defective mind of a kook, this gesture makes America ‘compassionate.’ What it
    really does is PROVE that certain philosophies are no less than a severe (and hard to treat) mental disorder.
    I wouldn’t be surprised if comrade obama dares to PARDON that scummy sleazoid when a New York ‘court’ is finished with him. Put NOTHING past this twisted administration, folks.
    Comrade obama sees terrorists as future friends. Somehow, that psychotic outlook will make America ‘safe’ and our enemies will then be ‘friendly.’
    Is there no END to the infamy that’s being forced on us? At this rate, washington will be known as the world’s refuge for mental basket cases who want to become bottom-of-the-barrel politicians.

  • RM

    I believe in the Judge Roy Bean system of a trial, except that these are terroists and should be tried in a Military Tribunal and when found guilty swiftly taken out and either hung or shot. Yes it is a diagrace to every veteran that has fought for this country and died to see this crap going on in the US. I have no use for obama or any other liberal socialist politician or citizen. They should leave this country and not come back. We do not need them here. These liberals are a disgrace to every American Veteran that has served from the begining of this country to now. To have obama apologise for every war that has been fought by this country on foreign soil is also a disgrace to our veterans. You people out there that call this guy commander and chief are also a disgrace.
    He is not a commander nor is he a chief. I believe in order to have respect for an individual they need to earn it no matter what title they have and he has done nothing to earn respect. On the contrary he is a disgrace to this Great Land. Wait till his administration and the rest of his liberal cohorts try and disarm the legal law abiding citizens with more of there socialist gun and ammunition control laws.

    • Curtis S

      RM: You wrote: “Yes it is a disgrace to every veteran that has fought for this country and died to see this crap going on in the US.”

      Don’t worry, if they died for their country, they’re dead and dead people can’t see anything.

      • Jana

        Curtis, but their families know it.

    • eyeswideopen

      Rm, the veterans died so that (word removed for offensive content) like yourself, who try and hijack the Constitution to make it fit your little emotional agenda can’t succeed. Well guess what, you are wrong. This is a Nation of Laws, not men with childish emotions who want to take this country back to the rough rider days. Luckly we have advanced with our Constitution intact and know that more shall die due to some men’s ego’s which is a sad fact. But they haven’t died in vain, as our Constitution is still functioning despite people like you.

      • Joe H.

        Eyes,
        I’m astounded!!!! very good post! Very good answer. Sometimes you DO open your eyes!!!!

        • Curtis S

          I said it before and I’ll say it again, a lot of the rednecks here are constantly whining about your first and second amendment rights. What about the fifth-amendment? How about the sixth? Do you guys pick and choose parts of your Constitution or are you passionate about defending the WHOLE THING?

          • Jana

            Curtis the 5th Amenment is abut Trial and Punishment and says:

            “Amendment 5 – Trial and Punishment, Compensation for Takings. Ratified 12/15/1791.

            No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

            Notice the part that says “except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia , when in actual service in time of War, OR PUBLIC DANGER.

          • eyeswideopen

            Curtis, they take things out of content and try and manipulate it to fit their emotional agenda. If someone farts wrong, they will find a way to blame Obama. Read Jana’s post, they don’t care if the facts are staring them in the face, they will believe Fox news rather than the Supreme Court Justices. That should tell you why this country is in trouble.

          • Jana

            eyes, You are the one taking things out of content and fitting it into your agenda. You are the only one being emotional on this group.
            This particular post shows how you are degrading yourself more and more.

            By the way, the reason we like to listen to Fox News is because they say it like we believe it. Finally someone with common sense speaks out like Fox News and we are thrilled.
            Scares you though. That is your mentality of “if it’s not my way then you are wrong”.

            This country was not made great by people with your Socialistic values.

            Actually the reason this country is in trouble is because of people like you. You scare me, because you actually believe your distorted sense of truth.

        • Joe H.

          except of course you didn’t address what the german said and that was worse!!!

          • Jana

            Ok, what was it?? I didn’t catch it. LOL

          • Joe H.

            No Jana,
            I’m sorry that was meant for Eyes! She got all over someone about talking about our heroes who have died for us but didn’t even address what the foreigner said which was worse!!!Much Worse!!!

          • eyeswideopen

            Joe, sorry, What did Curtis say that you want me to respond too? I believe he is right about how us rednecks act and think, so I have no response to that statement.

  • Robert

    We can rant and rave all we want. Obama will get his way and no matter what the outcome is, Obama will come out ahead. The media will make sure of that. He’s more concerned about disarming all Americans so there is no threat to him and his cronies. Too bad for us New Yorkers. A second terrorist attack is all but imminent and guess who’ll Obama will blame? Bush and Cheney. That’s his MO.

  • Warriors

    Does anyone know what the daily stipend is for inmates in maximum security prisons?

    • Joe H.

      Millions per year per prisoner!!!!

      • eyeswideopen

        JoeH. as usual you are misquoting. here is the link documenting the 16 who receive stipends. http://partisandefense.org/stipend.html

        • Joe H.

          eyes,
          excuse me I’m not perfect like you I mistook his post as asking the cost to keep these animals in max security. Please don’t shoot or hang me for that!!! Please!!!!

          • eyeswideopen

            Nay, Joe, you are trying to rally the troops into more anger, insinuating that it costs millions for prisoners stipends. Can’t fool me Joe, I know you and how you think. Hang you, never, I don’t believe in the rough rider laws like the rest of you do. I believe in the laws of the land, and am proud that we have been able to resist the ilk like you.

          • Joe H.

            Hey Eyes, you don’t raise puppies do you?

  • Warriors

    Terror Alert! BREAKING NEWS: Terror
    Alert in
    Chicago , IL

    The Chicago Bears football practice was delayed nearly two
    hours today after a player reported finding an unknown white powdery
    substance on the practice field.

    Head coach Lovie Smith immediately suspended practice and called the police and
    federal investigators.

    After a complete analysis, FBI forensic experts determined
    that the white substance unknown to players was the GOAL LINE.

    Practice resumed after special agents decided the team was
    unlikely to encounter the substance again this season.

    • Jana

      Warriors, you are too good. I love it. I have enjoyed all of your wit here. Putting a laugh in a serious subject and getting your point across at the same time. Thanks.

    • Joe H.

      Warriors,
      they finally figured out what the Cleveland Browns problem was! about two thirds of the team has a serious phobia of the goal posts….won’t get closer than ten yards from them!!!!

  • Bernie

    Does anyone care that this WHOLE administration is really trying their dammest to bankrupt the U.S.A. and have us live under socialism. People READ THE BIBLE it’s all in there, exactly what’s happening right now. I quess it’s all meant to be. Maybe if people go out to vote when that time comes and put these idiots out of office only then do you think we will have a chance to live the AMERICAN way not the Mexico,Venzualia,France and etc’s way. We have to wake up smell the coffee and stick together to change things our way not Obama’s way, who in the hell does he think he is CHRIST?

  • Robert

    Here’s something all of America should think about. If the 5 terrorists are found guilty will we have a reaction from the New York Arab and Muslims akin to what happened at the Rodney King trial? You bet your little bippies there will be. First time, New Yorkers showed restraint. But this time, they better have the military on hand. And then let Obama and his bunch of looneys explain why he gave the orders to kill Americans.

    • Joe H.

      Robert,
      Very good point! New Yorkers have so far shown a huge amount of restraint!! Let these animals be found not guilty or dismiss the charges on them and all bets are off!!!!

    • Jana

      If this ridiculous trial goes through in New York, I hope it accomplishes Obama’s undoing. There is NO, NONE, NOT ANY advantage for New York to have this type of trial there. It will only bring more terrorists to the area.
      I feel sorry for the New Yorkers.

      • eyeswideopen

        What a happened to all those terrorists that were tried there before? Did more come and watch the trials and then leave without a peep? You are a silly girl. You are all just a bunch of paranoid conspiracy theorists, gone astray and it is really sad. Even children are questioning your reasoning ability. Keep digging the hole.

        • Jana

          Eyes, I will remind you what you said yourself.

          eyeswideopen says:
          November 21, 2009 at 9:16 pm

          Marvin, you need to read our Constitution, our founding fathers were much smarter than you, and provided law that has withstood people trying to hijack it for over 233 years. When you get your law degree and specialize in Constitutional law, come back and let the knowledge flow. Until then, you might want to conside that even some people not in the U.S. know more about our laws than you do.

          And I am sure this is true for you too.

          • eyeswideopen

            Hell, yes, however, I can read and understand basic english. I also know the intent of the laws and can comprehend what the Justices are stating. I can accept facts, unlike you,( see your post above stating you don’t care what the facts are), even if I don’t like them, I can accept them. Are you still not understanding what the S.Court decided? You people have no faith in your Consitution, prison system, or military. You really should consider leaving as you are too paranoid to live freely in this country. You act like this will be the first terrorist tried in this country and put in prison. Naive.

        • Jana

          Eyes, You obviously can’t comprehend or understand basic English. I realize in your mind you are a genius and are smarter and better than anyone else.
          The example of you not being able to comprehend a simple statement, is, I stated that I didn’t care what wikipedia said, as I went to my old dictionary.

          Thats all right eyes, we all know you around here, and know that you are a manipulator and a Socialist. Now you are even resorting to cussing. hmmm sad and bitter. When someone has to resort to using garbage words then that means you have lost your ability to communicate properly, and you are in a rage. Yeah, that sure fits you.

          • kilrntex

            The curcuits in the liberal brains short out, leaving them no prompt to read, thus they start babling words they don’t understand themselves. I think they are words they heard on TV screamed out in desperation when they don’t know what else to say.

          • Joe H.

            you’re so right!!! No teleprompter!!!!! Can’t think, can’t speak or type!!!

          • eyeswideopen

            Jana, and your old dictionary told you the recent Supreme Court ruling about the terrorists? You make no sense. Do you think that wikipedia is just a dictionary? No wonder you are lost. Didn’t mean to curse, must apologize for that. Does Joe asking me if I rasie puppies mean that he cursed incognito? Implying that I am a b tch is such a noble thing. Are you going to tell him that he is also full of rage and has lost the fight? No, you are a little hypocrite and will never call out on of your own. Jana, go to a liberal site spew your crap and try and remain calm and collected the whole time. I doubt if you have the courage to go where you aren’t in the majority. It would be too uncomfortable for you. Until you can do that, try not to critize so much, as you aren’t walking in my shoes, you are just nipping at my heels, like a puppy. Be a grown up stretch your wings and try to see someone elses side. At least acknowledge that you and yours probably aren’t correct on every single subject or you would still be in power.

  • http://BobLivingstonAlternativeMedicine Michelle

    Robert,
    You are so right, it’s not funny….

  • ONTIME

    This is liberal bullying at it’s peak, it is going to backfire on them in ways they never dreamed. It is Constitutionally incorrect, there is no legal precedent and the logic is fallacious as well as upopular, Eric Holder is a ass for even letting Obama push him into speaking in favor of such historical tom foolery, it may well result in Holder having to give up his office.

    There is mounting evidence that the Newly Selected himself may not be immune to the tenactles of the PC terrorism from the murders at Ft. Hood, the HSO records show that he was well aware of the Imam that was counsel to the islamic shooter, now in the hospital. Seems that everyday there is more accumulation of another link between our pseudo POTUS and another muslim nut case, which may very well explain his unwillingness to identify islamic terrorism and why he is weak on prosecuting finatics like those in the black panthers or CAIR.

    The manyboy has made his own bed and his daily dilemma is compounding itself, hopefully it will lead to his own resignation and that in turn, the prosecution of him and all his legally corrupt supporters. The pot is boiling, Americans are becoming more agitated with each passing day and the fraud in the White House, the corruption of the congress is going to blow the lid off.

    The anger of the minuteman in the tri cornered hat is causing him to take aim at those who are defiling his legacy.

    • Jana

      The Defense Council will have access to private information that will then mysteriously become public. This is not good for our county, it is not good for New York, and hopefully it is showing the citizens of this country what an inept man we have in the Presidential position.

      • Warriors

        Jana,
        Glad you enjoy some humor. However, believe me the “man” is not inept. He and his cadre of Chicago thugs are executing their plan to insure democratic party success for years to come. They may sacrifice a few congress and senate creatures along the way, but the programs they are putting in place will ensure more patronage and entitlement followers than we can imagine.

        • Jana

          Warriors, you are right. He is definitely not inept at corrupting our government or our country.

      • eyeswideopen

        First you are complaining about not having transparency then you are complaining about having transparency… good grief, make up your minds. Unless you broke the law, you should not be afraid of a civil proceeding. Oh, you are afraid for Cheney? Oh, yes, now I see. Don’t worry he will be found out, but they can’t legally do anything to him as the time has passed where we could legally throw his slimey butt in jail. But, everyone will know about all of his illegal actions.

        • Joe H.

          Gee Eyes,
          I thought you were so concerned about the agent that Cheney “outed”! What about the dozens O-man will “out” with the investigation he allowed to proceed? Course that was one of his first lies and he has gotten better at them as time goes by!!! in the beginning of his term he said he was going to look forward and not focus on the past, IE Bush and Cheney! he has done nothing but the opposite!!!!

    • eyeswideopen

      Ontime, you need to read the laws, before making stupid statements. You obviously don’t know how to enforce the laws. Al Quada is not, nor has it ever been part of the Afghanistan government, so you cannot try them as soldiers. Get the basic facts straight prior to passing judgement on those who know the law.

      • Joe H.

        Eyes,
        What about the prison camp detainees that were tried in a military tribunal for crimes against their fellow detainees in WW2? They were civilians!!!

  • Dickie

    This is the only way for hussein has away to let these murder’s go free,By him miss speaking {again},When he stated these people would be put to death,By the court,Before they are even tried,So that is a miss trial to start with,And to put this costly circus in NY,Is another joke,If the goverment to scard to say terroist,Then,I guess,We would call a rapest,An overly sexual person,Or a theift,A nonworker,Or a person that murders people,AN mad person,WE dont want to hurt anyone’s feeling’s,Do we.Just buy them another island,Like we did for the other three.

  • http://BobLivingston m.morton

    agree

  • skywolf23

    i just got to say this is a briliant move on obama’s and left’s move.

    so what happened the last time we tried terrorists in court under bill clinton? we were monitoring and tracking ubl and his buddies via sattelite phone. the terrorists and their lawyers drag this classified info out in court because the government has to turn over their evidence in public court.

    what happens next? ubl and his buddies chuck their sattelite phones, and noone can trace their calls anymore and monitor their communications that we were doing freely before that came out in court.

    nevermind the huge cost to the american tax payers any time of of these thugs gets in front of a judge and a jury so they can make out like they are heroes and prattle on about jihad and god being on their side and the evil americans.

    god bless the left for dimwitted galactic stupidity, and for the record the right is not that much better but at lest the right does not make boneheaded stupid moves like this.

    • Curtis S

      Yeah… I’ve always wondered why the Bush Administration couldn’t find a freakishly tall Arab, using satellite phones and dragging a dialysis machine from cave to cave. There must be heat signatures from generators or communications to be traced. The US can find water on the moon but you can’t find Osama bin Laden? Is it can’t or won’t?

      • eyeswideopen

        Now Curtis, John McCain, promised that he knew where Bin Laden was and if he was President, he would guarantee that he would bring him in. I don’t know why he hasn’t told anyone where Bin Laden is so we can capture him. Maybe he is just P.O’d that he didn’t get elected, so he is punishing us. You know how losers change their minds. I was laughing the whole time McCain was spewing that crap about knowing where he was. He should have sent Palin over to get him, then maybe they could have won. LMAO.

        • kilrntex

          Obama called his buddy Osama and told him they were on to him, so he had to change his address. These terrorist have to look out for one another. As far as the five on trial, they should behead them at ground zero, take their talking heads to court and let them plead their cases. Only them Obama can let them go free and be martyrs in HELL! After all, all martyrs go to hell to be with their god. American HERO’S go to heaven to be with the “real” God!

          • Jana

            Kilrntex, GOOD ONE!!

          • eyeswideopen

            You are an example of what is wrong in American today. You are a conspiracy hound. You really have no idea of how utterly stupid you sound do you?

  • Eddy

    Obama most likely was buddy buddy with the terrorists when he went to Pakistan as a citizen of Indonesia when he still claimed he was a faithful Muslim. You know back when he was on summer vacation from the Ivy league college he says he went to,but no records can be found. Indonesia doesn’t allow dual citizenship makes you wonder if he lied then or is lying now. set your buddies free you commie.

  • Joe H.

    You dimmies can kiss your representatives that are up for election in 2010 goodbye as they voted AGAINST the wishes of their constituents today in D.C.. Why don’t you play TAPS for their careers!!!!!!

  • Robin from Indiana

    Leave them at Gitmo. We don’t need to spend any more on them. We will feed them and house them until they die. They don’t need a trial or a trip to New York. They love the limelight, so leave them where they are. It would be a terrible fate for them to have to live to old age in a prison.
    Obama and buddies have already said they know the terrorists will be found guilty. That is just their way of making sure it doesn’t happen like that.
    Where is George Bush when you need him??????

    • Curtis S

      Kissing Arab men and holding their hands?

    • kilrntex

      Behead them all and let Satan sort them out!

  • Joe H.

    Robin,
    sitting at home and being blamed for everything that goes wrong with this administration!!!!

  • Joe H.

    Kilrntex,
    Someone needs to tell the resident foreigner that the man in the mirror isn’t Bush!!!!!

  • James Corbin

    James Graham— I have said the same thing!!!!!!! You heard Hasan, say muslims do not want to kill muslims. So I think we are on the right page!!!!

  • James Corbin

    If those terroists go free—–I think there would be an up rise in this country!! I can’t see why they are being treated as a US citizen.
    This outrages me!! Those poor realitives that lost their loved ones in the 9-11 attact!

  • James Corbin

    Curtis, I believing you are describing Obama—-He seems to be the one bowing and kissing!!!!

  • LauraMaeRN

    I cant believe this ! Bringing these enemies of the American people to civil courts ! I am disgusted with OBAMA ! He is a muslim and a muslim lover and he has no respect for our African Americans, he disgraces them ! He has done nothing for them. Their first president and he is a farce !! What has happened to our ONCE great Nation! How can we allow this to happen! They are NOT CITIZENS, Obama has NO RESPECT FOR AMERICA he doesn’t even LIKE American’s he is a MUSLIM.

Bottom
close[X]

Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to PersonalLiberty.com,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.