Tea Party Supporters Question GOP’s Appointment Of Rogers

0 Shares

Tea Party supporters question GOP's appointment of RogersSome conservatives are not pleased with their party's decision to name Representative Harold Rogers (R-Ky.) as the next leader of the House Appropriations Committee.

Rogers, who is nicknamed the "Prince of Pork" because of his history of steering Federal dollars toward his home state through earmarks, was pegged as the next chair of the spending committee by GOP House leaders on Dec. 8. FOX News reports that Rogers came close to securing $100 million worth of earmark funding in 2010.

Some Republicans, including Senator Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), believe that the appointment of Rogers will not go over well with most Tea Party followers, who strongly support reduced government spending, including the elimination of pork legislation.

"It's unbelievable," Mark Meckler, co-founder of the Tea Party Patriots, told FOX News in reference to the selection of Rogers. "It's a direct message from the Republican leadership that they don't give a darn about what the American public thinks."

Representative Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), an anti-earmark crusader, received a spot on the Appropriations panel, and he may have oversight powers on certain funds that the committee distributes. The Wall Street Journal reports that Flake's appointment may help calm anxiety among conservatives about Rogers' leadership post. 

Personal Liberty

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to yousoundoff@personalliberty.com by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.