Suspending All Logic


Believing without doubt the official birth narrative of President Barack Obama — that he was born to Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Obama Sr. in a hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii, on Aug. 4, 1961 — requires a complete suspension of logic.

Last month, I pointed out in How Can Anyone Be A Birther? a partial list of reasons to doubt the official story. Note that I say it’s only a partial list. There is enough evidence to produce reasonable doubt in the minds of reasonable people that Obama is not a natural-born United States citizen as required in Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.

Obama has for several years claimed he was born in Hawaii. He has also claimed, through his official biography with a literary agent and as a young man in Hawaii, that he was born in Kenya.

Both of those are not possible. Therefore, one is a lie. Obama is, among other things, a liar.



No official original long-form birth certificate for Obama has ever been shown to media or to investigators. The only evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii comes from a liar – Obama — and in the form of an electronic document that investigators and document experts have determined is a forgery.

Former Senior Hawaii elections clerk Timothy Lee Adams claims in a Master’s thesis that there is no long-form birth certificate for Barack Obama on file in Hawaii. Adams writes in his thesis that Hawaii elections officials are aware of this fact.

From the thesis:

For starters, just because there is no long form birth certificate on file in Hawaii, that doesn’t rule out President Obama being born elsewhere in the United States, or even in Hawaii. What it does mean is this: President Obama’s official autobiography is false. Whether the President was born in the United States or no, we have no public documentation to prove that one way or the other. We do know that no hospital in Hawaii has any record of his birth there. We do know, that a child born quote, “In hospital, in Hawaii,” in the first half of the 1960s would have been issued a standard, long-form birth certificate, complete with all the normal birth documentation, signature of the attending physician and so on.

Adams also writes that his supervisors in the elections office also knew and admitted to him there was no long-form birth certificate on file for Obama.

The mainstream media and Congress have abdicated their responsibilities on the Obama narrative. Worse, they are complicit in Obama’s lie. The Hawaii elections clerk is also complicit in the lie, having emailed the Arizona Secretary of State that a long-form birth certificate is on file in the Hawaii elections office. These lies have convinced many to suspend all logic.

In his novel 1984, George Orwell wrote, “Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.” It has worked so well that the act of questioning the words of a liar who claims a forged document is legitimate has become crazy conspiracy theory nuttery.

But if you are willing to suspend all logic and believe the lie, there’s still the issue of Obama’s “father’s” citizenship, which disqualifies Obama regardless of his birth place.

Personal Liberty

Bob Livingston

founder of Personal Liberty Digest™, is an ultra-conservative American author and editor of The Bob Livingston Letter™, in circulation since 1969. Bob has devoted much of his life to research and the quest for truth on a variety of subjects. Bob specializes in health issues such as nutritional supplements and alternatives to drugs, as well as issues of privacy (both personal and financial), asset protection and the preservation of freedom.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.