Supreme Court To Hear Case Regarding Warrantless Police Use Of GPS

0 Shares

The Supreme Court is hearing a case that may affect some warrantless searches.The United States Supreme Court recently said that it would review a case regarding whether the placement of a GPS device on a suspect’s car by police constitutes a warrantless search.

The case the high court will review involves Antoine Jones, a nightclub owner and suspected drug dealer in Washington, D.C. According to The Washington Times, police obtained a warrant to place the GPS on Jones’ car, which specified that the device must be installed within D.C. and within 10 days.

However, authorities installed the device 11 days after receiving the warrant, while the vehicle was parked in Maryland. According to the news provider, this forced police and prosecutors to argue that a warrant is not needed to install a GPS device.

A number of courts have ruled differently on the case, with the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals overturning the life sentence Jones received for allegedly dealing drugs. The news provider reports that because of the differing opinions of lower courts, the Supreme Court has an incentive to hear the case and determine whether GPS devices can be used by police without warrants.

Reuters reports that the Supreme Court agreed to hear the case after an appeal was filed by President Barack Obama’s Administration.

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to yousoundoff@personalliberty.com by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.