Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty

Supreme Court Hears Public Union Dues Argument

WASHINGTON (UPI) — The U.S. Supreme Court appeared divided Tuesday as it heard a challenge to a rule that forces non-union State employees to pay partial union dues.

Illinois is among a number of States that pay home-care workers from Medicaid funds. During the past decade, at the State’s direction, more than 20,000 home-care workers in Illinois have voted to organize, and have won wage increases by joining the Service Employees International Union, the Chicago Tribune reported.

Some non-union home-care workers in the State objected on 1st Amendment grounds of free association. The National Right to Work Foundation, an anti-union group, sued Governor Pat Quinn and the SEIU, saying they conspired to reclassify home-care providers as State employees to collect more union fees, the Tribune said.

Key to the dispute is the 1977 Supreme Court ruling in Abood vs. Detroit Board of Education that said non-union members would have to pay for public union negotiating costs, which reach provisions that benefit all employees, union and non-union.

The high court has said, however, that non-union workers cannot be forced to pay for a union’s political activities.

On Tuesday, the Barack Obama Administration supported the 1977 ruling before the justices; but a lawyer for the National Right to Work Foundation, William Messenger, urged the high court to reverse the 1977 precedent.

Messenger’s argument not only drew fire from the court’s four liberal justices, but also conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, reported.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, a key swing vote, offered Messenger support, the report said.

UPI - United Press International, Inc.

Since 1907, United Press International (UPI) has been a leading provider of critical information to media outlets, businesses, governments and researchers worldwide.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Supreme Court Hears Public Union Dues Argument”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at


Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.