Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty
 

Study: Mandating Ethanol Wrong Solution

EAST LANSING, Mich., Feb. 13 (UPI) — While many Americans are willing to pay a premium for ethanol fuel, it doesn’t justify a government mandate for the fuel, a U.S economist argues.

Soren Anderson at Michigan State University studied the U.S. demand for ethanol — called E85 — and found when ethanol prices rose 10 cents per gallon, demand fell only 12 percent to 16 percent on average.

“I was a bit surprised,” Anderson said. “I was looking for this sharp decline in ethanol sales the moment the price got higher than the price of gas.”

Federal law calls for increasing volumes of renewable fuels to be included in the nation’s fuel supply, requiring more than 13 billion gallons of corn-based ethanol this year.

Ethanol is more expensive to make than gasoline and must be sold at a loss or subsidized unless consumers are willing to make up the difference, Anderson said in a MSU release Monday.

While some people are willing to pay more to help protect the environment, he said, mandating ethanol doesn’t appear to be the best option from an economic perspective.

“If our goal is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, this is quite a costly way to go about doing it,” Anderson said. “There are lots of other things we could do before switching over to ethanol.”

Giving consumers options or incentives for driving less or buying more efficient cars could be betters solutions, he said.

“You really want to give people the right incentives,” Anderson said. “If we taxed fuels at a higher rate based on the amount of pollution they caused, people would tend to choose cleaner fuels — but also use less fuel overall.”

UPI - United Press International, Inc.

Since 1907, United Press International (UPI) has been a leading provider of critical information to media outlets, businesses, governments and researchers worldwide.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Study: Mandating Ethanol Wrong Solution”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

Bottom
close[X]

Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to PersonalLiberty.com,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.