Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty

‘Stop-And-Frisk’ Lawyers Seek Return Of Judge Removed From Case

NEW YORK (UPI) — Lawyers for plaintiffs seeking to end New York City’s contested stop-and-frisk policy say they want Manhattan Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin back on the bench.

The lawyers say her removal from the case Oct. 31 by the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals was done by “a perfect storm of procedural irregularity,” The New York Post reported Monday.

In removing Scheindlin, the appellate court said her impartiality “ran afoul” of judicial ethics by giving media interviews in the middle of the trial over which she was presiding.

She ruled against the city’s stop-and-frisk policy in August, charging it illegally targeted minorities. She ordered the appointment of an outside monitor to oversee application of the program.

Late last week, attorneys for the city asked the appellate court to throw out Scheindlin’s ruling in light of her removal.

In requesting Scheindlin’s return to the case, Baher Army, a lawyer for the Center for Constitutional Rights, charged judges of the 2nd Circuit “cast aspersions upon the professional conduct of one of the most respected members of the federal judiciary — and thus inappropriately cast doubt on her legal rulings — while itself taking an unprecedented step that no party requested, of which no party was notified, and without providing the parties an opportunity to be heard.”

Last week, five prominent attorneys from across the country filed paperwork with the appeals court seeking Scheindlin’s return. They charged her disqualification “raises troubling issues” because none of the parties had asked for her removal. They also noted the judge had not been given a chance to defend herself.

UPI - United Press International, Inc.

Since 1907, United Press International (UPI) has been a leading provider of critical information to media outlets, businesses, governments and researchers worldwide.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “‘Stop-And-Frisk’ Lawyers Seek Return Of Judge Removed From Case”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at


Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.