Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty

Stock Amendment To Affect Wall Street Traders, Expands Definition Of ‘Lobbyist’

February 8, 2012 by  

Stock Amendment To Affect Wall Street Traders, Expands Definition Of ‘Lobbyist’

The House will vote on February 8 on its version of a bill that would crack down on Congressional insider trading and political intelligence peddling, The Washington Times reported.

According to the newspaper, this move comes as the version of the bill that the Senate passed last week has raised concerns regarding the notion that the legislation could turn the act of calling a Congressional staffer about a bill a lobbying activity.

Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) succeeded in adding a provision to the Senate bill that would require any individual who seeks information from a government official to help with investment decisions or analyze markets to register as a lobbyist, according to the Times.

"There is a growing unregulated industry with no transparency," Grassley said in a statement. "If a lobbyist has to register in order to advocate for a school or a church or a private corporation, shouldn’t a lobbyist have to register if they’re seeking information that ends up in making people a profit."

CBS News reported that the Stock Act passed in the Senate by a margin of 96 to 3 and the bill is expected to pass through the House with bipartisan support.

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Stock Amendment To Affect Wall Street Traders, Expands Definition Of ‘Lobbyist’”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at

  • s c

    Is there anyone out there who thinks elected scum in Congress have no legal or moral right to get rich at our expense? If WE can’t have access to insider stock information (because it’s ILLEGAL), then there is NO reason to let people in Congress do it.
    Are those vermin in Washington there to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution and keep America safe, or are they there to GET RICH any possible way they can do it?
    When a member of the House or Senate gets rich and has had access to insider stock information, it proves that our elected vermin have an agenda and that agenda has NOTHING to do with those slimers doing their job.
    Stop this crap. And if it can’t be stopped, then put an ‘exit tax’ on the SOBs when they leave Washington. Taxing 95% of their worth when they ‘depart’ seems more than fair. If people go to Washington to get rich, they don’t belong there in the first place. Why should we endure the elected version of a Madoff?


Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.