Senate Rejects Both Spending Proposals


Senate rejects both spending proposalsThe GOP's plan to significantly cut Federal spending has gained steam due to a wave of defections by Senate Democrats.

On March 9, a total of 11 Democrats voted against a bill backed by Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) that would have cut $6 billion from the budget for the remainder of fiscal year 2011. However, the Republican measure to slash $57 billion also failed to pass, which means that lawmakers will head back to the bargaining table.

The government is currently operating on a temporary spending extension that is set to expire on March 18. Many Tea Party supporters believe that the Republican proposal doesn't cut enough, while many liberals claim that the GOP-backed budget could cripple economic growth. However, the latest votes in the Senate reveal a divide among Democrats.

"Eleven Senate Democrats just voted against their leadership’s proposal,” said Michael Steel, spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), quoted by The Hill. "The bill supported by Senator Reid…proved less popular than the 'draconian' House Republican proposal in the Democrat-controlled Senate."

According to The Associated Press, Senator Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) said her party's cuts were not enough, while Senator Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) condemned the entire process, accusing legislative leaders of pushing partisan proposals that they know will fail. 

Personal Liberty

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.