SAF Argues For Stringent Judicial Review Of Alameda County Gun Ban


SAF argues for stringent review of stringent judicial review of Alameda County gun ban The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) has filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the Nordyke v King case, supporting the position that the Alameda County, Calif., gun ban is a Second Amendment issue, and as such should be subject to "strict scrutiny," which is the most stringent standard of judicial review in the United States.

The case stems from a decade-old ban imposed following a 1998 shooting at the county fair, and was brought by two operators of a gun show. They argue the incident was not related to their show and that the authorities used it as a pretext for a wholesale prohibition.

SAF Founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb said that the importance of the case stems from the fact that "it could establish the highest standard of scrutiny to which gun laws around the country would be subjected."

It "cannot be underestimated, or understated," he stressed.

Earlier this summer, SAF celebrated an important victory for gun ownership rights when the Supreme Court struck down the decades-long ban on handguns in Chicago.ADNFCR-1961-ID-19928798-ADNFCR

Personal Liberty

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.