Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty
 

Ron Paul Leaks His Choice for Vice President!!!

February 22, 2012 by  

Bob Livingston

is an ultra-conservative American who has been writing a newsletter since 1969. Bob has devoted much of his life to research and the quest for truth on a variety of subjects. Bob specializes in health issues such as nutritional supplements and alternatives to drugs, as well as issues of privacy (both personal and financial), asset protection and the preservation of freedom.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Ron Paul Leaks His Choice for Vice President!!!”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • Joe H

    As I have been saying for about a year now!!!! Ron Paul/ Andrew Napolitano 2012!!!!! Keep saying it till they get the message!!!

  • JimH

    Yep Joe, You called it. I remember some of your earlier posts, wanting that ticket. I’m on board with that.

  • Susie Liberty

    Judge Napolitano would be a superb choice, in my opinion! Wish this were located where it could be found by more readers!

  • bumba

    paul should releases his choice for taxes and vp. the other candidates should release there choice for vp as well. we the people deserve to know. im voting for paul btw. foxnews will hate it if he comes back, lol.

  • Susie Liberty

    And I assume that I can post this site? AND is this “wishful thinking” – as it would be for me? (I have seen that video blip with his mentioning Napolitano’s name…and then, as I recall, he mentioned a couple of other people?)

  • http://Yahoo. Patience kelllogg

    Ron Paul cannot make it. His plans are too radical for the white house. He will support the canidate that does. Art Center has the last debate 2-22-12 here in Mesa, Az. Lets hope theyall smile and give us solutions not flowerly speeches. Amen. He can be an adviser to the nominee.

    • Conservative values, independent thinker

      We need Ron Paul to be a radical in the White House!!!…

      Everything has to be corrected…what has been going on there for decades now, has been so very wrong.

      We need a Constitutionalist in there to undo all of the wrongs that have been perpetrated on “We the People” We need an honest man of integrity…who can’t be bought off by any entity. He has proven over 30 years that he is a man of integrity…no one else running can hold a candle to this man! If we allow the media to keep putting him on a back burner…then you are right. We need to speak up, or forever hold our peace! Ron Paul and Judge Napolitano 2012!!

      • Joe H

        Conservative values,
        i agree wholeheartedly!! we have tried all the same thinkers and procrastinators up till now. It is TIME for a new thinker that WANTS to follow the constitution!!! Perhaps THEN we will get this once great nation back on the road to recovery!!!

    • http://gravatar.com/revnowwhilewecan RevNowWhileWeCan

      Please excuse the pun but our Patience has ran out as a country.
      “Ron Paul cannot make it. His plans are too radical for the white house.” Please stop regurgitating this uninformed statement without stating specifically what it is that is too radical. It’s repetitious, influentually harmful and at this point, quite boring.
      As for Napolitano. Yessssss! With his knowlege of how “the system” operates and his popularity, I beleive this could be the thing that catapult’s his campaign into the (finally) mainstream frey. Paul/Napolitano 2012!!

    • s c

      Patience, when you say ‘too radical,’ WHAT do you mean?
      Are you hinting that The Anointed Poser is NOT too radical? Please do us a favor, and after you read or re-read the Constitution, PLEASE tell us HOW the current prez has any use for the Constitution? HOW is he NOT beyond being WAYYYYY too radical and interested only in imploding America?
      You seem to be a newy here, so people will give you some slack temporarily. Try to be more specific, as a lack of specificity tends to mean semantics. We get all the crapola and thick-headed semantics with the current in-house utopians who are paid to send in feedback to this website. One more thing, too. A ‘Republican’ is also known as a neocon or a RINO. A conservative is NOT a ‘Republican.’

    • AintSayin

      Yo Patience, put a cap on the negative Bull!

    • paradigmshift

      How did Constitutional governance become radical? Are you afraid to let the States decide issues not covered in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights? Do you trust the Federal Government to do a better job than the States would do? You would have to change the Constitution to make your argument plausible!

  • Susie Liberty

    Thanks for posting this, Bob. Is it possible for it to stay up for a couple of days – and shown to be a topic – in order that people have an opportunity to see/comment?

    Thanks again. Never thought I’d have reason to say this, but Coverage Really IS a Lovely Experience. (And yes, I’m aware you’ve had some good articles on Dr. Paul in the past!)

  • http://gravatar.com/revnowwhilewecan RevNowWhileWeCan

    I know I’ve said this before but I’m a first time GenX voter and I feel like I gotten to open one of my Christmas presents early! This is AWESOME!! Paul/Napolitano 2012! I need bumper stickers asap!

  • FreedomFighter

    Man this is strong. They will need to cheat at the polls, Im sending them some money.

    Laus Deo
    Semper Fi

    • http://gravatar.com/revnowwhilewecan RevNowWhileWeCan

      Like!

  • Raymond Carl Hardie

    I appreciate this article because it helps keep us (The People) informed. It amazes me that so many of the citizens of this Country do not have any sense of vision concerning our future. Patience Kellogg says Mr.Paul is too radical for the White House, what is the basis of her assumption! In America we are free at the moment to speak our beliefs of personal opinion and conviction regarding any issue whether it is religious, political, philosophical, or otherwise. One must understand that a persons free will is nothing more than the power of decision and action, in short, we act out or base our actions upon what we have decided to believe. The question now arises from what source or sources, do we get the information from which we base or decisions? In America there are many avenues of media, and the information at times is in constant conflict between most of those media outlets, so that to be as accurately informed as possible we must search out not just what is being piped to us, but we must see what the former history of any individual or event is, in order to rationalize a more accurate assessment of the individual, or events in question so as to make the best choice for the direction of our support or rejection of any one or anything we exercise our free will to embrace. Now back to this article and Mr.Paul, I have lived a long time and I have had the privilege of witnessing first hand the background of many current politicians and Ron Paul is not radical, but he is consistent in his stand for and support of Constitutional adherence, and today we, The United States of America, are in a perilous situation and I see the election of this year as our last chance for doing something which can turn things around, and that means we must have someone like Mr.Ron Paul whose past performance reflects upon his beliefs, and shows that he will make the hard and necessary corrections which our National Government desperately needs NOW! The lobbyists and status quo politicians seek to continue our current course of spend, spend, spend, with borrowed and fiat money, if any of the other candidates, Republican or Democrat, are elected, we will see our money collapse over the course of the next four years, and if the voice of those economists are right like Insider Fortunes, than we will see goods and services at hyper-inflation thru 2013 to 2016, and resulting in gas at 25 dollars a gallon by 2016, just four years from now. It is not a pretty picture but after reading the financial policies of the Weimar Republic of Germany and seeing that they did exactly the same thing we are doing by trying to print our way out of debt, but eventually our global banking benefactors such as China, will no longer let us cheat them out of money through quantitative easing. It is amazing that in 1947 the US produced 86% of the worlds manufactured goods, and we were the greatest creditor nation in the history of the world, and by 2010 the US produces less than 13% of the worlds manufactured goods and we have become the greatest debtor nation in the history of the world. These statistics are from the OMB, US Chamber of Commerce, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.The German Government began inflating (quantitative easing) their currency in 1914 to pay for the war, and continued doing so after the conflict until 1923, eight years of constant increases in government spending ended in the german dollar (Mark) becoming worthless by the end of 1923, by july of 1923 it took 100,000 mark notes to equal 25cents, by August it took 1,000,000 mark notes to equal 25cents, and by November it took 1-Trillion Marks to equal 25cents. Needless to say this began the collapse of the German economy and the beginning of the great depression in Europe, the result from the Germans buying their debt from the countries of Europe with quantitative easing solutions, it did not work out so well in the final result. What I wonder makes the leaders here think they can make the same path of financial maleficence work a different result? We need Ron Paul, because he will stand and make the right decisions his record proves he is consistent in this. If he is not elected, than we had better get ready for what appears to be a collapse of catastrophic implications from continued failures in our leaders who will continue to do more of the same.
    Respectfully,
    Raymond Carl

    • http://gravatar.com/revnowwhilewecan RevNowWhileWeCan

      Raymond, the basis for her assumption is laziness unfortunately. This is because she is just reporting what she hears every day from the MSM and then hears it again in the breakroom. This is why I’ve been calling on all of our Liberty bloggers here to spend just 2 hours a month blogging on those sites and refuting their crap with facts. As I’ve said, by doing this WE can be the voice at the water cooler for the “lazy’s” who just like to repeat what they hear and not look into anything for themselves.
      (Cnn’s…This just in)
      (Fox’s…Happening now)
      If anyone has any more suggestions, I’d love to hear them.

  • Belinda Duncan

    YESSSSSSS!!!!!!!!! I AM SOOOOO EXCITED TO LEARN THIS….WHAT A TEAM~I’VE PREVIOUSLY SAID I WISHED THE JUDGE WOULD RUN FOR PRESIDENT AND THIS CAME AS SUCH A PLEASANT SURPIRSE…WAS CONSIDERING PALIN FOR VP…THE JUDGE TOPS PALIN FOR HIS EXTREME KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW AND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RIGHT AND WRONG…WE COULD ACTUALLY GET AMERICA BACK UNDER THEIR “REIGN”; WE COULD ONCE AGAIN BECOME OUR OWN STRONG NATION LOOKING AT WHAT’S BEST FOR US THE “PEOPLE”, TAKING CARE OF OUR OWN, LIVING WITH “LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL”. GOD BLESS THIS TEAM AND LET THE MIRACLE OF A “WIN” HAPPEN.

  • TIME

    There can be only one; thats, Dr. Ron Paul!

    PEACE & LOVE

  • Susie Liberty

    Bob Livingston – PLEASE confirm this!

    I’d be sending it to everyone were I certain that was indeed Dr. Paul’s decision. (Because I would feel sure he wouldn’t be flip-floppin’ on it, and he’s Not for Sale!)

  • http://boblivingstonpl.wordpress.com Bob Livingston

    Dear Susie Liberty,

    What more confirmation do you need than Ron Paul’s own voice?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPLJuvZOFjs&feature=related

    Best wishes,
    Bob

    • Susie Liberty

      Except Bob, I recall hearing this clip…and I believe he continued with the comment…maybe with more names, maybe saying there were others he’d consider. And so, before I share this, I just want to be certain that this is confirmed, and I know you’ll understand.

      I NEVER missed the Judge on Fox Biz and a couple of other programs which were before and after his. Except for him, Fox would have lost me entirely. (In fact, I have several of his programs on DVR…were exceptionally good.)

      So, this choice would have my 100% plus support!

      Have very much appreciated the well-deserved coverage on Ron Paul on personalliberty.com. The Black-out by Corporate anything has far exceeded frustrating for those of us who truly believe in restoring our Government to Our Constitutional form. So, thank you for the opportunity to at least discuss his platform with other readers.

Bottom
close[X]

Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to PersonalLiberty.com,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.