Researcher’s ‘Self-Plagiarism’ Detected


TORONTO (UPI) — A medical journal has castigated a University of Toronto medical researcher for quoting his own previous studies in what it called “self-plagiarism.”

Editors at the Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews issued a rebuke to Stephen Matthews and two colleagues for using unattributed text from five of Matthews’ previous papers in a paper published in 2005, Postmedia News reported.

The replication was uncovered by an undisclosed software program used to seek out plagiarism, the report said.

The journal issued a retraction to the report this month along with a harsh criticism.

“Re-use of any material should be appropriately cited and quoted,” the journal says. “As such this article represents a severe abuse of the scientific publishing system.”

The retracted paper written by Matthews and two associates focused on the effects of glucocorticoid drugs routinely used on pregnant women at risk of early delivery, Postmedia said.

Matthews’ various research projects have received more than $10 million in Canadian federal funding from various agencies, which define self-plagiarism as “redundant publication” and disallow the practice, the report said.

Neither Matthews nor the university would comment on the journal’s retraction.

UPI - United Press International, Inc.

Since 1907, United Press International (UPI) has been a leading provider of critical information to media outlets, businesses, governments and researchers worldwide.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.