Republicans Hate Democracy
August 9, 2012 by Sam Rolley
Ron Paul isnâ€™t going to be elected President of the United States, and future candidates with similar ideas will not be elected to the Nationâ€™s highest political office either. For this reason, many mainstream pundits consider runs like that of Paul to be exercises in futility.
But those of us paying attention know just how very wrong those pundits are. Paul and his most dedicated supporters have managed to demonstrate, loudly and for a broad audience, that the American election system is democratic only in name.
For months, Republicans, disaffected Democrats and some Independents have been robotically repeating the mantra, â€śAnything is better than Obama.â€ť The chant is true for people who do not agree with President Barack Obamaâ€™s collectivist vision, illegal warmongering and disdain for self-made success. Except for when it is not.
Despite the unwillingness of manyâ€”Republican diehards in particularâ€”to accept reality, the fact remains that Mitt Romney, the man foisted as the primary opposition to the incumbent in November by the two party political system, is little more than a new face for political stagnation.
If your beef with the current President is related to the healthcare overhaul, Romneyâ€™s history regarding state-administered healthcare likely hasnâ€™t put your mind at ease.
If you are a staunch Constitutionalist, he surely isnâ€™t your man.
Tired of crony capitalism? Get used to it if you are a Romney supporter.
If you believe in unencumbered 2nd Amendment rights, check out the gun-control side of the former small-varmint-hunting Governor of Massachusetts.
There are many more examples of things that a Romney Presidency will not fix or change. In a reasonable world the similarities between the failed policies of Obama and those that will be implemented under Romney would be recognized and discussed. In reality, however, the elites with a vested interest in perpetuating the myth that the Republican leadership is any different than the Democratic have won out. With massive amounts of money, the leadership of both sides has ensured that Americaâ€™s will be a Republican/Democrat political system, and have written the rules to ensure that dissenting views are shut out.
When the 2012 Republican primaries rolled around, the GOP leadership did what the party has done in Presidential elections of past: It offered up its anointed candidate surrounded by a batch of long-shots, windbags and crackpots to give the electorate an illusion of choice while making sure that the will of the leadership would be carried out in the end.
And it has been, with the exception of supporters of the â€ścrackpotâ€ť Paul refusing to go along with the plan.
With all of its political analysts and public policy experts, the GOP failed to realize that the mindset of many Americans has changed greatly in the past 12 years. Many of its own party members realized during the Bush Presidency that the Republican leadership cares little for Constitutional values. And on the other side, average Democratic voters realize that their messiahâ€™s â€śhopeâ€ť and â€śchangeâ€ť of the past few years feels very similar to policies they hated in the past.
GOP elites have been forced to realize their miscalculation as Paul supporters showed up in droves to support their candidate and amassed him enough delegates to secure a spot at the Republican national convention later this month. When his popularity and his supportersâ€™ firm understanding of primary election rules became clear, the GOP elite panicked and worked feverishly to undermined Paulâ€™s contingent. Last minute rule changes took place in some States and police beat-downs of Paul supporters in others.
Now, the convention is drawing near and the GOP leadership is running out of options for silencing Paulâ€™s small-government, anti-cronyism Constitutionalist voice. The leadership has resorted to proving outright that American democracy is dead.
There is a big fight going on right now in Maine, where Paul took a majority of the delegates earlier this year. Because the candidate did so well in the Stateâ€™s primary, his delegation heading to the RNC later this month would mean a position of prominence for Paul at the convention, giving him the opportunity to point out Romney/Obama similarities and decry the direction mainstream political thinking is leading our Nation. The GOP isnâ€™t having it.
Maine Republican Party Chairman Charlie Webster, a Romney supporter, has told the Paul delegates that they will not participate in the Tampa convention unless they agree to the following terms of a â€ścompromiseâ€ť:
1.Â A majority of the delegates sign a statement agreeing that, if Ron Paul is not on the ballot, they will vote at the Convention for Mitt Romney.
2.Â Instead of Brent Tweed [Paul delegate], Charlie Webster or Paul LePage [RNC cronies] would serve as the spokesperson for the delegation and announce the votes cast for president. That spokesperson would also handle all media on behalf of the Maine delegation.
3.Â There will be nothing negative said about Mitt Romney or positive said about Obama (especially to media).
4.Â The Delegation will be admitted to the Convention, and to all committee assignments, without barrier.
5.Â The Contest [GOP ripped Paul off] brought by Jan Staples and Peter Cianchette will be withdrawn.
In essence, those that donâ€™t agree with the GOP leadership may attend the convention only if they agree to follow like sheep the orders of their party masters. The delegates have rejected the â€ścompromiseâ€ť and a RNC committee is currently deliberating the dispute.
The leadership of the GOP realizes that their candidate is so transparently similar to Obama, that they canâ€™t even risk a hint of criticism by party members. They have elected to use the same tactic that has always been used by political leaders that know they are wrong and at risk of being figured out; silence the opposition.