Personal Liberty Digest™ will be upgraded this weekend to reflect a dynamic new look and mobile-friendly viewing to enhance your experience! Plus, we'll be providing even more of the compelling content you've come to expect, delivered in a whole new way!

  Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty

Publishers Oppose Amazon On Domain Names

WASHINGTON (UPI) — Book publishers say they oppose Amazon’s application for top-level Internet domain names, including .book, .read and .author, calling it monopolistic.

Amazon’s request comes as the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers hopes to increase the number of potential Web addresses, with hundreds of new generic top-level domains to be added to the existing .com, .net and so forth.

As applications began to be received last June, it was revealed some large Web-based companies, such as Google and Amazon, were looking to acquire large numbers of domains featuring common words such as .shop and .book.

The Association of American Publishers and Authors Guild President Scott Turow have written to ICANN to express their opposition, TG Daily reported.

“Placing such generic domains in private hands is plainly anti-competitive, allowing already dominant, well-capitalized companies to expand and entrench their market power,” Turow, himself a best-selling author of legal thrillers, said in his letter. “The potential for abuse seems limitless.”

Amazon has made no attempt to hide its desire to monopolize the .book suffix, explaining in its ICANN application it would “provide a unique and dedicated platform for Amazon while simultaneously protecting … its brand” with “no resellers in .book and no market in .book domains [since] Amazon will strictly control the use.”

Such control would run directly counter to ICANN’s stated aim of encouraging competition, the AAP said in its letter.

“From inception, the introduction of new gTLDs [generic top-level domains] has been promoted as a means to increase competition, add consumer choice, support Internet freedom, expand market differentiation and diversify service providers,” it said.

“How would handing over ownership of a domain string to any one single private company, such as a retailer, for its own business goals support that public service mission?” it asked.

Similar complaints have already been made by Barnes & Noble, and the European and International Booksellers Federation.

UPI - United Press International, Inc.

Since 1907, United Press International (UPI) has been a leading provider of critical information to media outlets, businesses, governments and researchers worldwide.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Publishers Oppose Amazon On Domain Names”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at


Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.