Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty

Paul: Let SCOTUS Rule On NSA Constitutionality

August 20, 2013 by  

Paul: Let SCOTUS Rule On NSA Constitutionality

Most people in the United States have a hard time believing that the National Security Agency reforms President Barack Obama announced earlier in the month or any number of Congressional inquiries will do anything to protect Americans’ privacy from government spies. So Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is proposing that the government system of checks and balances be used as it is designed, to allow for a Supreme Court review of the NSA’s tactics.

“I think the constitutionality of these programs needs to be questioned, and there needs to be a Supreme Court decision that looks at whether what they are doing is constitutional or not,” Paul said Sunday on FOX News.

Paul was speaking on the news network following The Washington Post’s publishing of a new Edward Snowden sourced report that detailed how the NSA breaks privacy rules and oversteps its legal authority thousands of times per year.

Paul contends that allowing NSA to operate in a manner that is totally unConstitutional evidences Obama’s lack of understanding of government checks and balances.

“The checks and balances are supposed to come from independent branches of government,” Paul said. “So he thinks that if gets some lawyers together from the NSA, and they do a powerpoint presentation and tell him everything’s ok, that the NSA can police itself.”

Furthermore, Paul said, the President and Congress cannot be trusted to fix the problem as long as they are deliberately misleading the public about the scope of the NSA programs.

“They chose not to report the program, period,” Paul said. “They said they weren’t looking at any American data or any phone calls, and it turns out they’re looking at billions of phone calls every day.”

Paul said that the only way to make sure the NSA doesn’t abuse its surveillance power is for a discussion led by people who are more skeptical of the NSA than the intelligence insiders currently acting as placebo watchdogs to take place before an open court. The Senator added that he thinks the Supreme Court would be the best option.

Sam Rolley

Staff writer Sam Rolley began a career in journalism working for a small town newspaper while seeking a B.A. in English. After learning about many of the biases present in most modern newsrooms, Rolley became determined to find a position in journalism that would allow him to combat the unsavory image that the news industry has gained. He is dedicated to seeking the truth and exposing the lies disseminated by the mainstream media at the behest of their corporate masters, special interest groups and information gatekeepers.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Paul: Let SCOTUS Rule On NSA Constitutionality”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at


Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.