Partisan Battle Over Effectiveness Of FEMA Rages On

0 Shares

The comments that were made by Cantor were met with harsh criticism from FEMA officials who noted that the organization needs the funding due to the scope of the disasters.Several influential members of both parties have defended or attacked the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as Washington debated the necessity of the organization.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) has voiced his distaste for the Federal agency and has said that the money that is used by FEMA could be offset by cuts from another area of government, according to The Hill.

“We are just going to have to make sure there are savings elsewhere to continue to do so,” Cantor said in an interview with Fox News. “Just like any family would operate when it’s struck with disaster, it finds the money to take care of a sick loved one or what have you, and then goes without trying to buy a new car or put an addition onto the house.”

The comments that were made by Cantor were met with harsh criticism from FEMA officials who noted that the organization needs the funding due to the scope of the disasters, Politico reported.

Representative Ron Paul (R-Texas), a man who has denounced the agency for many years, noted that FEMA was a system that was inefficiently run and devastated by the bureaucracy that the Federal government has come to represent, Human Events reported.

Personal Liberty

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to yousoundoff@personalliberty.com by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.