Obama’s Quiet Crackdown On Leaks


The Administration of President Barack Obama has used the Espionage Act to bring criminal charges in five alleged instances of national-security leaks. That is more than all previous Administrations combined.

In an article on NewYorker.com, reporter Jane Meyer discusses the case of Thomas Drake, a former senior executive for the National Security Agency. Drake is being charged under the Espionage Act for talking to a reporter at The Baltimore Sun about “fraud, waste and abuse and the fact that there were legal alternatives to the (George W.) Bush Administration’s ‘dark side.’”

“When President Barack Obama took office in 2009, he championed the cause of government transparency and spoke admiringly of whistle-blowers, whom he described as ‘often the best source of information about waste, fraud and abuse in government,’” the article read. “Gabriel Schoenfeld, a conservative political scientist at the Hudson Institute… says, ‘Ironically, Obama has presided over the most Draconian crackdown on leaks in our history — even more so than Nixon.’”

In the article, Drake said he had hoped Obama would be different, “But power is incredibly destructive. It’s a weird, pathological thing. I also think the intelligence community co-opted Obama, because he’s rather naive about national security. He’s accepted the fear and secrecy. We’re in a scary space in this country.”

Personal Liberty

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to yousoundoff@personalliberty.com by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.