Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty
 

Obama’s Assault Weapon Ban a Prelude for Banning All Guns

February 18, 2013 by  

Bob Livingston

is an ultra-conservative American and author of The Bob Livingston Letter™, founded in 1969. Bob has devoted much of his life to research and the quest for truth on a variety of subjects. Bob specializes in health issues such as nutritional supplements and alternatives to drugs, as well as issues of privacy (both personal and financial), asset protection and the preservation of freedom.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Obama’s Assault Weapon Ban a Prelude for Banning All Guns”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • Jeremy Leochner

    One slight problem. The assault weapons ban under Clinton did not lead to a ban of all guns. And even Britain with is total gun ban has not turned into Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia or Communist Cuba.

    • JimH

      Hi Jeremy, The Clinton era assault weapons ban(if it was so good, why was it set to expire?), didn’t result in a tyrannical government take over.
      Briton didn’t turn into Nazi Germany. But Germany turned into Nazi Germany.
      Pol Pot, Idi Amin, Lenin, Castro and Stalin did and do exist.
      Just because it hasn’t happened here, yet, doesn’t mean it “can’t”.
      Through out the world and history it has happened.
      Those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

  • http://comcast.net BobW

    What the anti gun crowd doesn’t understand is when the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor they could have continued east and invaded the west coast. The reason they did not. They knew the American people all had guns, not just the military, and they would have gotten their rearends kicked. The hunters, gun owners, recreational shooters all keep our country as safe as our great military does. Again, no one wants attack an armed country. Look at Switzerland, I believe every male is required to have a gun. They are the Swiss Army. Banning guns is the communist way of a government lording over the people. We stopped that senerio back in 1776 and don’t need to go backwards.

Bottom
close[X]

Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to PersonalLiberty.com,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.