Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty
 

NRA’s Upcoming Annual Meeting To Feature Sarah Palin

March 8, 2010 by  

NRA's upcoming annual meeting to feature Sarah Palin The National Rifle Association (NRA), America’s oldest civil rights and sportsmen’s group, has announced that the 2010 Annual Meetings and Exhibits will be held at the Charlotte Convention Center in Charlotte, N.C. in mid-May.

This year’s event is expected to attract some 70,000 attendees to approximately 400 exhibits, and will feature leading firearm manufacturers who will display the firearm industry’s latest products. Visitors will also have a chance to view various hunting and shooting accessories and an extensive private collection by NRA-affiliated gun collector clubs.

NRA’s Celebration of American Values Leadership Forum will take place again this year, followed by the Celebration of American Values Freedom Event. Former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin is expected to headline one of the meetings.

"Governor Palin is one of the most requested speakers in America today," Wayne LaPierre, the NRA’s executive director, told CNN.

"She’s an outdoorsman, hunter and a steadfast supporter of our Second Amendment freedom," he added.

Among other noteworthy events during the three-day convention, there will be presentations on methods of concealed carry, hunting in Africa, firearms law, the grassroots workshop as well as Refuse to Be a Victim seminars.ADNFCR-1961-ID-19644152-ADNFCR

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to yousoundoff@personalliberty.com by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “NRA’s Upcoming Annual Meeting To Feature Sarah Palin”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • L, USA

    America and I Refuse to Be a Victim! I say she nails it with that ifr, range finder/wind/air density/ smart scope and could with peep n’ post sights too! Good for US! She Rocks!

  • Jerry Mobley

    Why would a grassroot orgainization like the NRA have Palin for a spokesperson? She quit on the people of Alaska. She spoke at the Tea Party convention for a handsome some of money and said she related to the grassroots orgainizations. The next week she tells a diffrent group you should vote either democrat or repbulican. I see all this as someone who is very selfserving with an elitist attitude, otherwise more of the same big government, more spending, and less individual rights. No Palin for me or groups that use her as a spokesperson!!!

    • American

      Jerry, Sarah Palin left her office simply and only because the left-wing haters and the MSM bombarded her consistently with lies and half-truths. It became a daily task to try to set the record straight and to keep it from harming her family which took away from her ability to spend all her time and energy focusing on the job at hand. If you look at her record from before the election she did an impressive job for the people of Alaska. The money she received for speaking at the Tea Party convention was given back in donation. As far as her saying you should either vote Democrat or Republican, you twisted that a little. Her message is that everyone should vote to make their voice heard. How about get a little info on a subject before souting off?

      • Jerry Mobley

        American,
        I am sure she had HER reasons for quitting as Governor of Alaska. I don’t deny her the right to do what she thinks best. I wouldn’t want her representing me, because I don’t quit.
        It is hard for me to even cosider that if she had done such a great job as Governor that she would quit. I have never seen any documentation that supports she gave the money back in donations and you didn’t offer any. I stated exactly what she said. It looks like there is one more that needs to “get a little info on a subject before spouting off” I am a true conservative. I believe in the Constitution of the United States of America. I support the NRA in most endeavors, just not this one.

        • theaton

          Jerry, I would hope you would leave office if you had a bunch of progressive idiots suing you on a regular basis, suits that cast the State of Alaska hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees. This is another area of our legal system that needs to be reformed. There should be a looser pays rule for suits of this kind. The way it is, it costs little for someone to bring a suit but it costs the Governor and the State lots of money to defend. It’s really interesting that those that cry the loudest for tolerance or those that tolerate the least.

          • JeffH

            theaton, you can’t reason with someone that bases their mindset on information provided by MSM.

          • Jerry Mobley

            theaton,
            No, I would not quit, so long as I had the support of the people who elected me. I do agree however legal reform is needed.

          • Jerry Mobley

            JeffH,
            Do you consider Personaliberty.com MSM? I don’t.

          • JeffH

            Jerry M, I don’t either. If I’m going to make a statement, I’m going to do my homework and not be influenced by the MSM, PLD, or Robert Gibbs.

          • Bob

            Theaton You say the MSM is against her. Where does she get all of her publicity from. If it wasn’t nfor the MSM she wouldn’t be known outside Alaska.

        • Charles Gardner

          Get a grip Jerry. You couldn’t see the truth if it slaped you in the face. Do your research on my friend Sarah.

          • Jerry Mobley

            Charles Gardner,
            I beleive I have done my research on Palin. In my opinion her talk does not match her actions.

        • L, USA

          Mobley, Can you honestly look down the barrel of that rifle and say that she looks like a quitter?

          • Jerry Mobley

            L, USA ,

            Yes I can.

          • L, USA

            Mo, Then you are very foolish.

          • Jerry Mobley

            L, USA ,
            In my opinion not foolish but unafraid.

          • L, USA

            JM, The point of your assertion was whether Sarah is a “quitter” or she isn’t. My statement points to her determination as depicted thru the rifle scope/barrel. Not whether you are afraid to die once. All who have been born twice are fearlessly ready to die once, and are unspeakably fearful, fearing God, to avoid the second death, aren’t you? Do you understand?

          • L, USA

            Such ambiguity in my post above. Let me clarify. Giving one’s life to God includes being willing to die physicaly in defense of truth, as is written in the Hebrew and Greek scriptures, that being translated into english 1612 OKJV. The scriptures reveal that it is appointed once unto men to die, and after that, the judgement. Whosoever is found in the Lambs book of Life, will enter in to Life everlasting. Those not found there will be judged out of the Book of Rememberence, where every sin is written therein and will be bound hand and foot then cast into the lake of fire (this is the second death) that burns with fire and brimstone for ever and forever. God bless America http://www.americancongressfortruth.org

        • http://www.usconstitution.com Constitutionalist

          Jerry Mobley:
          Do you hate ALL WOMEN or just Sarah?

          • Jerry Mobley

            I do not hate, I am a Christian. I like women and do not hate Palin. I see her actions as one I would not want representing me.

          • L, USA

            Constitutionalist, “Jerry Mobley”s’ claims seem elitist and froward minded; ingorant of reproof and foresight. Can we say, P. C.?

          • http://www.NRA.com Stephaan

            Jerry:
            Then I can’t imagine who you would want representing you. Care to elaborate?
            Which of her actions do you not like? Be specific regarding her actions as how they relate to the 2nd amendment.

          • Jerry Mobley

            Stephaan,
            I personally would prefer Ron Paul, Peter Schiff, or Rand Paul as my short list as the individuals most likely to represent my point of view. I agree with anyone who supports the 2nd Admendment as the Constitution calls for, that includes Palin. I will not support some one who quits.

          • http://www.NRA.com Stephaan

            Jerry, 2 of those 3 are high on my list too, so at least we agree on something. Since you replied to “American” and “Theaton” above, I’m guessing you read their posts. What’s the point of her continuing when she was spending all her time defending herself, (and the states money defending herself) and not able to spend her time representing the people of Alaska?
            I’m thinking if she had NOT quit, then you would be slamming her now anyway for not stepping down, for wasting taxpayers money, and spending all her time defending herself, instead of representing her state.
            With folks like you I think she was dammed, no matter what she did. Looks like the liberals would have won this one either way.
            If you’re going to judge her, then judge her character, and then compare her to Ted Kennedy, the liberal lefts longest serving, greatest champion. At least Sarah never killed anybody while driving off a bridge, drunk! I guess THAT’S OK, as long as it’s a liberal that does it. ;-)

          • JeffH

            Stephaan, so right you are.

    • Louise

      Jerry I agree with you! The NRA is afront for the Republican party.
      I don’t trust them or Sarah Palin.
      Yes In know the NRA teaches gun safety. That part I agree with. I am not anti-gun just anti-NRA.

      • JeffH

        Louise, you aren’t even close with your assumption. The NRA is pro freedom, no matter what party is involved.

      • http://www.usconstitution.com Constitutionalist

        Louise;
        That has got to be the most ignorant statement ever made. If you are anti-NRA then you are also anti-Constitutionalist, and anti-2nd amendment, and anti-freedom. What DO you believe in? Socialism, communism, China, North Korea, Iran, Obama?

        Can you give a reason for being anti-NRA? Do you know, why you are, or are you just parroting what someone else said at your local liberal socialist gab fab?

        • eyeswideopen

          Constitutionalist, show me where the Constitution says that you have to like or agree with an organization in order to believe in freedom. You called her statement ignorant,,,,name calling is such a honorable thing, and you said she was anti-constitution. Didn’t anyone tell you the constitution gives us all freedoms to like or dislike clubs, people, drinks, food, religions, etc….? People like you who demand that someone like a specific organization are not following the constitution. The NRA is a gun lovers club, there are a ton of people who have guns, love guns and are not members of the NRA. You are a hypocrite and are not a Constitutionalist in practice.

          • http://www.usconstitution.com Constitutionalist

            Eyes blinded, but mouth going 100mph,
            GUMS FLAPPIN, TONGUE WAGGIN!!

            Why don’t you try reading my post before replying? Her statement was ignorant, and IF YOU KNEW ANYTHING ABOUT THE NRA YOU WOULD AGREE. Maybe you should let Louise answer why she is ANTI-NRA before you try and put your spin on it!

            YOUR SPIN, Words without thought coming outta your pie hole at 100mph
            you say: “The NRA is a gun lovers club” ha ha ha ha
            That statement is more ignorant than Louises. That just shows that you know absolutely nothing about the NRA, the 2nd amendment, or the Constitution. Shut your pie hole until you learn something.

          • Dave C.

            Hey Constitutionalist, Joe H. and Stephaan have a contest going for all the new names they can come up with for Eyes Wide Shut, Eyes Glued Shut, etc. You need to enter it because that is the best I’ve seen so far! I give you a perfect 10 for that one :-)
            Score was Joe H +8, Stephaan +7, and you already have +10 for that one. I think the winner gets to pick her permanent name……

          • Joe H.

            davec,
            I think he should have added “brain arattlin’”!!!! I must admit, though it was VERY good!!!! Also very correct!!!!

          • JeffH

            Try “size 15 EEEE mouth”, some pretty big feet to constantly stick in her mouth almost daily.

          • eyeswideopen

            Constitutionalist, I was a member of NRA for 20 years, until they got involved with issues that didn’t concern gun owners. If you think every gun owner is a member, you are sadly mistaken. Calling someone ignorant because they don’t want to support an organization reeks of subversive force. Our constitution doesn’t state that you have to support or join the NRA to believe in gun rights or the constitution. You are the ignorant one. Dave’s saying that government is force, seems to apply the the Conservative movement now. Conservatives are force, if you require everyone to believe in a specific organization to be a beliver in freedom. You are anti-American and we all should be afraid of people like you, hiding behind the title of Constitutionalist. What happened to freedom of choice?

          • JeffH

            eyes with the size 15 EEEE mouth, I doubt you were never a member of the NRA just as you were never a Republican. Heck, you can’t even distinguish who you support or what government you support. I’d bet you live in a small home and lock yourself into a small dark room with just a tiny monitor and internet so you can “stalk the net” searching for your next victim. You are one sick and twisted individual. Wonder Woman you ain’t, and for that matter, you aren’t even close to the “Pollyanna” you think you are.

          • Unbiased Observer

            Does EYES CLOSED TONGUE FLAPPING, EVER READ peoples posts before she puts her mouth in gear? She never address what is actually posted, but rather spins it into something totally different, and then gives non-substantive opinions based on what she has determined to be the subject of her choosing. Why does eyes blinded find it necessary to answer for Louise, (and everybody else, for that matter?)

            What everybody here was replying to, was Louise stating that SHE (Louise) WAS ANTI-NRA! Why does eyes open her garbage can sized mouth to answer questions that people have asked of Louise?

          • http://www.usconstitution.com Constitutionalist

            eyeswideopen says:
            March 10, 2010 at 11:31 am

            Eyes says: I was a member of NRA for 20 years

            I say: I highly doubt that, or you would at least know something about them. Your statement that the NRA is a gun lovers club, is almost as ignorant as Louise saying she is not anti-gun, but is ANTI-NRA! Anybody that has EVER belonged to the NRA does not think they are a gun lovers club LMAO.
            *****************************
            Eyes says: until they got involved with issues that didn’t concern gun owners.

            I say: And WTH would that be? What issues was NRA involved with that DIDN’T concern gun owners? You used the “plural” issue(s), so I expect you to list at least TWO ISSUES!
            *****************************
            Eyes says:If you think every gun owner is a member, you are sadly mistaken.

            I say: I never said that. Where do you come up with that crap?? Typical of you uneducated liberals to put words in other peoples mouths! You are practicing Saul Alinskis’ tactics! Confuse, accuse, deny, and lie!
            *****************************
            Eyes says: Calling someone ignorant because they don’t want to support an organization reeks of subversive force.

            I say: Read it again you #$&%*$stupid biatch! I said her statement was ignorant, because she said she was “not anti-gun, but ANTI-NRA”!
            *****************************
            Eyes says: Our constitution doesn’t state that you have to support or join the NRA to believe in gun rights or the constitution.

            I say: Well NO DUH!! I never said that either Eyes, you loony toon! Read it again, and don’t make up crap this time! Put down the Saul Alinkski book, and try and comprehend what you are reading!
            *****************************
            Eyes says:You are the ignorant one.

            I say: Who would intelligent people consider to be more ignorant?
            Me…? or YOU who can’t even read my post, comprehend it, and then respond to things that I actually said, instead of making up a bunch of convoluted crap and putting words in my mouth! You are a typical left wing nut job! Would you care to take a vote on here?
            *****************************

            The rest of your post is so rambling, incoherent, misspelled, and farcical, that it isn’t worth a response. You have obviously lost your train of thought, and need more weed or alcohol or whatever it is that connects your synapse.

          • Dave C.

            Eyes Wide Shut says: What happened to freedom of choice?

            An interesting question, considering you can’t seem to correctly address peoples questions, without ranting on and on about issues that have nothing to do with the original statements made.
            I’m sure if your mother had known you were going to turn out to be a politically uneducated, liberal socialist, anti American hack, wearing a tin foil hat, and drinking gallons and gallons of koolaid, she might have made a different “choice” way back when.

          • Dave C.

            Oh, I forgot the “mouth wide open, gums flapping and tongue wagging”, “mouth as big as a garbage can”, “eyes blinded but mouth going 100mph”, and the woof woof” part! ha ha ha…Sorry for the omission ;-)

          • eyeswideopen

            Constitutionalist, she can be pro-gun and not like the NRA, are you so insecure that you can’t grasp the concept that some people don’t like the NRA, but do want people to have guns? Purely anti-American on your part. People don’t have to carry guns to believe that you have the right to carry them. You are really not a deep thinker are you?

          • eyeswideopen

            Constitutionalist, you don’t even have the ability to grasp when someone is being facetious do you? The misperception many have of the NRA, is that it is a gun lovers club. Grow up.

          • http://www.usconstitution.com Constitutionalist

            Eyes Wide SHUT, BRAIN IN NEUTRAL, BUT MOUTH STILL GOING 100 MPH

            I guess you ARE nothing but a worthless hack like everyone says. Why don’t you try responding to my post point by point. Is that too complicated for you, or do you just not have any answers for your LIES!
            Did you make so many errors and tell so many lies in your posts that you can’t address them all?
            YOU are the one that needs to grow up and get politically educated you worthless little wench. Look around at your pathetic posts on these blogs. You never post anything with any substance. Your post are all comprised of your worthless opinions, false facts, and your pathetic lies. Wake up, and then GROW UP, and try answering my post with real answers rather than your typical 3rd grade blather!
            You are even more pathetic than you first appeared.

      • http://wwwNRA.com Stephaan

        I can see why insecure and non patriotic women hate Sarah. They are jealous of her career and the success she’s had, and they are so damn jealous because Sarah’s so damn good lookin. Try and be truthful ladies. Don’t try and lay your dislike for Sarah off on her politics.

        As far as why anyone on this blog would be anti-NRA, is beyond me. Even the left wing loonies like coal miner who hate everybody, and everything American, are PRO-NRA!

        Louise, pray tell, why are you ANTI-NRA??

        • JeffH

          There are some that are pro-2nd amendment that are members of other pro gun orgs and don’t support the NRA. As a gun owner, I also belong to multiple Pro gun orgs as well as the NRA.

          • http://wwwNRA.com Stephaan

            Jeff;
            Louise didn’t say that “she didn’t support the NRA”,

            She said she is ANTI-NRA…. There is a BIG difference between “not supporting the NRA” and being “ANTI-NRA.

            My question to Louise stands.

          • JeffH

            Stephaan , I agree with you 100% and my comment wasn’t meant to defend those like Louise. She isn’t misunderstood by me at all.

          • http://www.NRA.com Stephaan

            Right you are Jeff. I don’t think people like Louise are misunderstood by anyone who has even the slightest knowledge of the Constitution, the 2nd. amendment, and the NRA.

            I think L,USAs’ comment re: Jerry, probably fits Louise as well. Politically correct liberal who picks and chooses which rights she wants to apply to her, and is also selective about which ones she will ALLOW to apply to the rest of us.

            L, USA says:
            March 9, 2010 at 2:55 pm

            Constitutionalist, “Jerry Mobley”s’ claims seem elitist and forward minded; ignorant of reproof and foresight. Can we say, P. C.?

          • eyeswideopen

            Stephaan, just where did Louise try and take any of your rights from you… This whole attack on her shows what a bunch of radicals you all are. Does your wife agree and like every single thing you do? If not do you call her a liberal and state that she is taking away your rights? Guess what dude, there really are conservatives who don’t even own guns, much less belong to the NRA, are they too taking away your rights? Ridiculous statements from non-thinking dittoheads.

          • http://www.NRA.com Stephaan

            Eyes shut tight, BUT MOUTH WIDE OPEN !!

            Give it a rest would ya Eyes! Quit following me around like a little puppy. You are starting to annoy me, and I am going to have to send you to the dog pound, and with your constant “barking” you won’t last long there. They will immediately send you to doggie heaven because of your constant yapping!!

          • eyeswideopen

            Stephaan, whats the matter, you can’t deny that you are lying and slandering people, so to make yourself feel better you need to sink to the level of name calling, trying to make yourself feel better.
            For my friends who are leaning towards supporting conservatives, I just refer them to this site, to show them how you all attack anyone who has the nerve to not agree 100% with your outreagous ideas. Soon as they read these posts, they call me stating that you guys are really radical and now they know how you got tagged with the radical right name. Keep going, you just make the case for rational people to not support your far reaching ideology.

          • JeffH

            Eyes with a size 15 EEEE mouth. I take issue with this statement:

            “For my friends who are leaning towards supporting conservatives, I just refer them to this site, to show them how you all attack anyone who has the nerve to not agree 100% with your outreagous ideas”.

            I doubt that you have any friends and I surely doubt you have any friends that aren’t liberal hacks like yourself.

          • http://www.NRA.com Stephaan

            Eyes Blinking, but nobodies home;

            There you go again, off on another tangent.
            My statement was re: Louise being ANTI-NRA! She said it! That is what I addressed. How is that a lie? It’s one thing to not support an organization, but quite different to be ANTI-NRA. I want to know what, if anything, they did that made her anti-NRA. There are some 2nd amendment groups that I don’t support financially, but I am not ANTI towards any of them. I would like Louise to explain herself, NOT YOU! That’s who I asked, Louise, NOT YOU! DO YOU GET IT? Not YOU!
            WE ALREADY KNOW YOUR OPINIONS ON E V E R Y T H I N G!
            You’re such a busybody you think you can answer for E V E R Y B O D Y.
            You are a typical liberal, ALWAYS sticking your nose in EVERYBODY ELSES BUSINESS.

            p.s. There is some good news (for us righties on this blog) I saw Dave at the pet store this morning. He was buying a dog leash and some kibble, and a dog carrier. Hmmm, I wonder who that’s for. My hope is that he’s shipping you off to live in that socialist trash dump called Europe, where you will be FAR AWAY from us. I think you will enjoy reveling in their socialist squalor. Woof, woof.

          • Jody

            Woof, Woof, ha ha ha ;-)
            PLEASE don’t ship her off to Europe. I need a new “WOOFER” for my stereo. It’s gotta be BIG, about 24″ and I’m sure the mouthy one will suffice! May I have her?

          • Liberal Lucy

            Eyeswideclosed;
            Please shut it! You do not represent me or the moderates, which my friend is. From your posts you don’t seem to represent any political view. You just rant and rave about everybody and anything.
            You do not try and discuss the 2nd amendment, and the ANTI-N.R.A. statement, but instead you step all over peoples right to the 1st amendment in the process, so please shut it.
            Do you think they do not have the right to say a person has made an ignorant statement? You are the hypocrite! You do the same thing that you accuse them of.
            Do you think Obama has not called people “ignorant” in the last 2 years?
            It is funny that you say this blog and the posters here will drive your right leaning friends more to the left, because you are driving me more to the center, and if you keep it up much longer, maybe to the center right! You have done more harm here to the moderates, and the left, than any of them have done.
            Your rants that do not address the issue or subject at hand, just SHOW EVERYBODY HOW INTOLERANT YOU ARE OF ANYONES IDEAS EXCEPT YOUR OWN!

          • http://www.secondamendmentfoundation.com Dartanian

            Top of the mornin to all my fellow American Patriots!
            or should I say “woof” “woof” ha ha ha…..After reading all the posts, I feel no need for any Seinfeld. He is kind of lame compared to you guys.
            Whoever it was that said it is a good idea to have liberals like EyesWideShut post on this site, was absolutely correct!
            Not only have your responses to her been absolutely hilarious, (thanks for that mates) but also have been “eye opening” as far as pointing out the hypocritical factor that she and the liberals in general exude so well! Thanks for the education, and the laughs ;-)

            Jody: Sorry hun but I don’t think the fellows will give the “woofer” to you. I think they want to send her a LOT farther away. Personally I don’t think socialist Europe is far enough. I am proposing that we send her to the dark side of the moon, where she can’t bother ANYBODY!

          • Sandra

            I think Eyes wide shut wishes she was really Rachel MadCow.

            I also believe EYESWIDESHUT made the ANTI-NRA post under Louises name, because she didn’t have the cahones to post that under her own name.

            Bob Livingston, Sarah Palin, Ron Paul, and the 2nd amendment ROCK !!

            Eyeswideshut, not so much…. woof woof lmao :-)

      • http://www.ccrkba.org. Dartanian

        Louise says:
        March 8, 2010 at 11:01 am
        I am not anti-gun just anti-NRA.
        **********************************************************************************************************
        Well Louise, since everybody else has picked apart the rest of your ignorant post, that only leaves me your last line…. But I do not fret, because it is a good one.
        “You are NOT anti-gun just anti-NRA”. Bloody Hell Louise, what does that mean? ha ha ha ha, look up “oxymoron” in the dictionary Louise, and do a little research on the NRA before making such ignorant statements in the future! It will be interesting to see if you can explain your self and answer any of our questions re: anti-NRA on here, but personally I don’t think you will be back. I think you have probably stroked out from too much caffeine and are flopping back and forth on the floor by now.

      • J C

        The NRA does not align itself with either party. It is a “front” for the Constitution of the United States of America in it’s intended form. Especially as pertains to 2nd Amendment rights.

      • Meteorlady

        PMG – I have been a member of the NRA of years and never once have they asked me to contribute to the Republican party. I’m an independent and want to stay that way.

        If I follow the logic for gun control I would think that pencils misspell works; spoons made Rosie O’Donnel fat, and guns jump up and commit crimes and kill people.

      • James

        Louise, I’m curious, what don’t you like about the NRA? I don’t like the NRA’s misrepresentation of the Second Amendment, what don’t you like?

    • dennisintn

      obviously, you didn’t listen to all of either speech. there was no difference in the premises she talked about in both speeches. one of the best things about palin is that she tells you exactly what she thinks whether she thinks you’ll like it or not.
      pres. zero can’t be believed about anyhing he says. one example among hundreds: he told the voters of pennsylvania that coal would continue to be an important part of the american economy for many decades to come. then he goes to california and, on a radio interview, said he would tax the coal industsry out of business, starting as soon as he was elected. he’s making jimmy carter look better every day.
      dennisintn

  • J C

    Boy this article ought to bring the anti-self defense control freaks screaming from under their rocks! LOL
    Go Palin! ;)

    • JeffH

      You got that right. Some just refuse to acknowledge the facts, Sarah Palin believes in America and the freedom that accompanies citizenship. Because she speaks from her heartfelt experiences as a wife, mother, citizen, mayor, governor and VP candidate and seems to be able to relate to middle America, she has been cast as the dumb broad and quitter. Never mind that she has endured all of the nasty attacks generated by Obama, the Dems and the media. She is certainly a survivor of all of the negative ignorance levied against her. Most that “hate” her will continue to do so, because that is what they do and that is what they are. One thing I do know, she believes in America and she doesn’t need the media to do her dirty work, she tells it as she sees it.
      The Dems and the libs hate her because she threatens and exposes their un-American agenda and ideals, simply put.
      Nothing much better than a woman in a flannel shirt, blue jeans and an AR locked and loaded.

      • http://wwwNRA.com Stephaan

        Well put Jeff. I think one thing about her that scares the hell out of the libs is that she just tells the truth and doesn’t care what people think. She just puts it out there and lets the chips fall where they may. Honest people admire this in her. We’re tired of hearing lies from the liberal left, and hearing someone like her just speak honestly is like a huge breath of fresh air.
        The liberals fear this and don’t understand it, because they have lied throughout their political careers in order to achieve anything. They have ALWAYS LIED to the people in order to get anywhere, and they just don’t get how the truth works for her.

    • http://www.usconstitution.com Constitutionalist

      You got that right JC
      Eyes shut, but mouth going 100mph is up there whining and crying right now. I wish O’Liar would cut her welfare off so she’d have to go get a freakin job and wouldn’t have so much time to stink up the place ;-)

  • Raggs

    I still cannot get over her and oreilly calling the tea-party gun loving idiots… Talk about a double standard…

    • JeffH

      Raggs, you really should get your facts straight, nothing could be farther from the truth. Constant baiting by O’reilly didn’t get the results he was searching for.

      B.O: So Governor, you gave the keynote a couple weeks ago in Nashville for the Tea Party Convention. Did you see extremism? Do you think it’s a danger to the Tea Party?
      PALIN: A lot of people, I guess this New York Times reporter, they just don’t like that message of we being taxed enough and wanting to remind our elected officials of their constitutional limitations of big government, and just kind of get government back on the side of the people. It was an honor to connect with those people.

      Didn’t see the extremism that, of course, those in some of the mainstream media and some self-proclaimed elites would like the rest of America to believe is encompassing the Tea Party movement. Didn’t see that

      http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2453524/posts

      • Raggs

        I would suggest you take the time to look up the interview it was about three weeks ago. I happened to have watched oreilly for the last time on the night he had palin as a guest!…
        Before you call someone a liar you really should get the facts.

        • JeffH

          Raggs, #1, I didn’t call you a liar, but if you insist, then it is what it is.
          Here is a link to the interview, and I couldn’t find any negative remarks by Palin, although O’Rielly was sure baiting her. I surly can read and comprehend, and if you read the transcripts from the interview you might change your interpretations. Read it for yourself.

          http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2453524/posts

        • Joe H.

          Raggs,
          Where was the statement in the interview?? I couldn’t find it!! You should have pointed it out in the interview so as to avoid problems!!!

          • http://wwwNRA.com Stephaan

            Joe,
            I couldn’t find any derogatory remarks by Palin either.
            I think there are 2 raggs on here. One seems like a conservative and is rational and logical, the other liberal Raggs posts all kinds of crap to bait us just like OReily baits people on his show.

            HEY RAGGS, Why don’t you tell us EXACTLY where this evidence of yours is!! The part where YOU SAY—> Sarah says Tea Party peeps are gun loving idiots. Show me!! Show us! You claim it’s there!! Back it up!!

  • MagnaHombre

    Jerry M thought is right on target. Sarah Palin’s press secretary was left go lately for not doing job correctly. Googled “name” + council on foreign relations. Press secretary is a member of CFR. Palin most likely made a deal to be VP. You do not get to be Pres, VP, Sec State etc without being OKed by “Elitist” group. There are many wolf in sheep’s clothing – Palin and McCann are two.

    • J C

      And that is exactly what is wrong with the whole system. It is why democracy doesn’t work. It doesn’t matter who you vote for they are soon forced to shelve their own ideals and dance to whatever tune the corporate and political elite are calling today. These criminals have made a mockery and a sham of what was once a noble ideology.

  • theaton

    2. ALWAYS keep your finger off the trigger until ready to shoot.

    • L, USA

      thea, that’s just before you flip the safety off.

  • Hello?

    Louise! I don’t know how you stand on gun rights but the NRA is the only organization that is fighting for your secnd amendment. THE ONLY ONE. These Socialists in our government would like to take control of every aspect of your lives. We do not have a Democrat party these days. I expect , in your life time you will consider a weapon your ticket to life and freedom and we just may have to fight off terriosts in our neighborhoods. They are infiltrating this country by the millions in their quiet way, kind of like termites , you don’t even know they are significant until your house falls. Watch and wait, be aware of your surroundings, there are enough in this country to take all of us hostage at any given time. I had a business deal with a guy from Morroco named Mohammid, I asked why was he in this country with all the corruption in our government and he told me THAT WE WOULD NOT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THAT MUCH LONGER.They have a plan and there are 32 training camps in this country. Please donate to the NRA, they are your best friend. Blindness is a bad thing, search out the truth and this has nothing to do with Sarah Palin but your freedom and life as we know it. Your enimies are even at your door step. Look around and notice , you can see them and they are not really hard to recognise. This administration is dead set on taking rights away from us and before too long , and they have already tried to take your second amendment away in the past and if we don’t stand our ground, they will get it done before you can bat an eye and you will be a criminal if you have anything to protect yourself. Take a second look at the NRA.

    • Raggs

      I think your on target the only thing obama and clan need is a state of emergency to put the country under marshal law and take your guns.

      • Joe H.

        Raggs, see my post to you above.

      • JC

        Don’t keep all your firearms in one place.

      • Meteorlady

        From my cold, dead hands……..

  • sowhat says

    Raggs, You are right..No pun intended..if your a democrat..

    Obama has a backdoor program which is where he plans to hire his own security (regime)..Kinda like Hitler and the SS..

    If he ever placed us under Marshall law for no reason…that would be the end and a civil war would break out..come to think about it, that may just happen because of this moron…

    Take my gun from cold dead hand…

    • Raggs

      Nope I’m not a dumbocrap!
      And I have seen his speaches were he wants a civil police as strong as the military… And yup you bet it has only one purpose.
      I just dislike palin after her comments of the tea-party in stating she thinks they are extremist and racial gun loving idiots. AS SEEN ON TV! oreilly to be exact. I would not get so wond-up on palin if I were you people. I think all politicians are snakes.

      • L, USA

        I don’t know about that Raggs, the media (tv,radio,internet..)can’t be trusted now. It can be dubbed and ‘voiced’ over and is ALL monitered. Electronic communications, including telephone, goes into the database center in Holland where the hyper-computer (<1 trillion bps) there is called beast. It may generate the synthetic intelligence for the "image" that is set up to be worshiped by subjects of the bio-engineered/gene spliced, Beast or Anti-christ to come. May it be delayed.

      • http://wwwNRA.com Stephaan

        Hey Raggs:
        First you say Palin said:

        Raggs says:
        March 8, 2010 at 9:33 am
        I still cannot get over her and oreilly calling the tea-party gun loving idiots…

        Raggs, Then 6 hours later you say:

        March 8, 2010 at 3:39 pm
        I just dislike palin after her comments of the tea-party in stating she thinks they are extremist and racial gun loving idiots. AS SEEN ON TV! oreilly to be exact.

        SO WHICH IS IT RAGGS? What did Palin say? You changed your story twice in 6 hours.

        Are we “GUN LOVING IDIOTS?

        Or are we “EXTREMEIST AND RACIAL GUN LOVING IDIOTS?

        Which is it? Tell us which it is and WHERE IT IS!!

        • L, USA

          Stephaan, You have it cornered, but keep temper! The first thing a “liberal” uses to oppose truth, is confusion and unchecked emotion in his opponent. Reason and understanding are YOUR greatest assets. Keep getting more and use it well, always. Your input is very effective!

          • http://www.NRA.com Stephaan

            LOL L,USA;
            You offer good advice, but whenever I get a potential liberal socialist “rat” cornered I pull out my .45 and start blasting. I have no reason, composure, understanding, or mercy when it comes to violations of the Constitution or the 2nd. amendment.
            I fire a “spotting round” for accuracy, and then “fire for effect” ;-)

  • Rhea

    Agree on emergency plan … isn’t it 20,000 new employees feds just hired in 2010?? Where are they … not in the Post Office but maybe new jobs for the ACORN friends. After midnight is when I kept seeing the Uncle Sam Wants You ads for volunteers … is that without a plan? I don’t think so.

  • Stewie

    The N.R.A. stands in the way of Obama and the U.N. from taking our guns away. First Hilter took control of the banks, autos and health care. The next thing Hitler took away were the people’s guns. Obama is following history.

  • George V

    Guys we need to be watchful of everyone heading towards representing the people of America We need to start judging these folks by their acts not their words. I have yet to see her stand against Hillary’s attempt to grab our guns. Has anyone seen otherwise? I would think that she would be first in line with that and nothing, nada, ziltch from Palin. Be weary of them all.

    • L, USA

      Now, there are numbers to support 2nd Amendment rights (and other laws which endorse the keeping and bareing of arms for citizans) against the nwo Clinton machine. Before, Sarah used descretion, which is said to be the better part of valor, to live (politicly) to fight another day! We must charge and overcome politicly in elections and by every peaceful means or all will be lost!

    • http://wwwNRA.com Stephaan

      George;
      I really don’t think the NRA would be inviting Sarah to speak if they had any doubts about her support of the 2nd amendment, her lack of kicking Hillarys fat ass, regarding the UN’s gun ban, notwithstanding!

    • Joe H.

      George V.
      Please tell me that V doesn’t stand for Voinovich!!!! I’m from Ohio!!!!

  • Grover Syck

    It says, “To insure a well regulated militia”, AKA National Guard. Beyond that, all guns are fair game.

    If the present trend continues, we are in for a very disastrous future. We must register, and control all privately owned guns.

    • DonFL

      Grover, I’m sorry to say you are mistaken that the Militia is AKA National Guard.. Malitia in the days of our forefathers meant ALL FREE MEN!! Liberals would have you think it’s a right for the National Gaurd, meaning the states control but it is a RIGHT GRANTED TO THE PEOPLE.

    • Joe H.

      grover,
      I suggest you not try to control any guns but your own!!! You are messing with the rights as the scotus has determined to be God given.
      Don’t mess around with my god given rights libbie!!!!

    • J C

      “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”
      Which part do you find confusing?

  • http://wwwNRA.com Stephaan

    Hey Grover;
    What do you mean “WE”? You got a mouse in your pocket??

    “You” Grover, can register and control all “your” privately owned guns, but DON’T INCLUDE US in your “COLLECTIVE WE”

    Read what DonFL says Grover, and read it c a r e f u l l y. What he says is exactly right and correct. Don’t let the liberal socialists try and convince you of anything else!

    • J C

      He’s must be kidding eh, Stephaan? Register and “control” all privately owned guns? I guess they don’t teach the children history in school anymore. Other wise he might know about Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Idi Amin and few other fun loving mass murderers who just loved the idea of registering and controlling all privately owned guns.

      • http://www.NRA.com Stephaan

        JC;
        I don’t really think Grover is an anti-2nd amendment liberal. I just think he is misinformed about a couple of things, and didn’t get his wording quite right.

        This sentence of Grovers tells me he understands somewhat:

        “If the present trend continues, we are in for a very disastrous future.”

        • JC

          Yes we are. Be prepared my friend.

  • http://google DTHOMPSON

    ALL YOU STUPID AND MISGUIDED BY THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA LIBERLS CAN SAY AND DO WHAT YOU WANT. AS FOR ME I SUPPORT PALIN AND THE NRA AND THE 2ND AMMENDMENT RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS AS OUR BILL OF RIGHTS GIVE US THANKS TO OUR FOUNDING FATHERS AND JAMES MADISON IN PARTICULAR. I DONT KNOW ABOUT THE REST OF YOU BUT THEYLL HAVE TO TAKE MY ARMS FROM MY DEAD-COLD FINGER GOD FORBID THAT DAY COMES IN AMEREICA. THE STATEMENT ABOUT OBAMA FOLLOWING THE STEPS OF HITLER ARE EERIE AND TROUBLING. I AGREE WITH STEWIE. OBAMA STUDIED AND WAS FASCINATED WITH HITLER IN COLLEGE. CHECK OUT THE VIDEO OF THE KIDS IN SCHOOL SINGING AND PRAISING OBAMA VERY SIMILAR TO WHAT HAPPENED IN GERMANY WITH KIDS THERE SINGING AND PRAISING AND SALUTING HITLER BEFORE THE HOLOCOUST!!!!

    • J C

      Here’s a fun little comparison for you…
      Obama and Hitler, peas in a pod?
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS2rJP-udUs

      • JeffH

        I about fell out of my chair laughing…great production and a somewhat appropriate comparison of how they endeared the publics trust.

        • JC

          yeah it’s hilarious isn’t it? :)

          yes we can yes we can…zeig heil zeig heil..

  • http://myronjpoltroonian.blogspot.com Myron J. Poltroonian

    I have said this before, and I’ll say it again: If, at any time, anyone, black, white, green, blue, yellow or brown (shirted), or any shade in between, ever tries to intimidate, delay, dissuade or otherwise harass or prevent me from voting, I’m afraid I’ll have to remind them of the words of the irate Quaker: “Friend. I would not harm thee for the world. However, Thou Art standing where I am about to shoot.”. They will not “Take my gun from my cold, dead fingers”, rather, “Others will take my bullets from their (and/or your) cold, dead bodies.”. Any questions? Note for “Progressives” with “Aggressive Gun Control Disorder” – this means you and any turncoat “Americans” you send to do that which you have not the gónadas to do yourself. “This far and no further” is not just some quaint phrase – it’s a way of life when our freedoms are threatened. Our Constitution is under attack and I, for one, will stand up and defend it. The oath I took when I joined the service: “To Preserve, Protect and Defend the Constitution of the United States of America Against All Enemies, Foreign and Domestic”, placed no limit nor timeframe on my obligations in this matter and I recognize none.

    • JeffH

      W’re on the same page.

      • Joe H.

        JeffH,
        I think all true Americans are on the same page on this subject!!!!

        • L, USA

          Freedom is Liberty! …And for the Republic, for which we stand!

          • L, USA

            How did that typo get there.. That’s TO not for. The Republic is each individual American, independently, yet together as one. God is with us! As for NG, we who serve our LORD and countrymen as with the state, are in positions of authority to be a first line of defense against all enemies of the Constitution, both foreign and domestic. The citizanry will always be the last line of true defense of life, liberty and freedom to live and love ,our God, and befriend our fellow mankind.

  • Sandra

    I think Eyes wide shut wishes she was really Rachel MadCow.

    I also believe EYESWIDESHUT made the ANTI-NRA post under Louises name, because she didn’t have the cahones to post it under her own name.

    Bob Livingston, Sarah Palin, Ron Paul, and the 2nd amendment ROCK !!!

    Eyeswideshut, not so much…. woof woof lmao :-)

    • J C

      We need a whole lot more women like you Sandra.

    • eyeswideopen

      Sandra, I don’t hide behind anyone elses name. Do you have a fixation with Rachael? I am not insulted that you picked someone such as Rachael, a Rhodes Scholar obviously isn’t dumb. Thank you.

      • Sandra

        Eyes Sewed Shut, GUMS AFLAPPIN , TONGUE WAGGIN LIKE A PUPPY DOGS TAIL
        “Woof” Woof”

        You did post under Louises name. It is quite clear to everybody on here. I just call em like I see em. In your case it is easy because you are so plastic and transparent.
        No thanks necessary for the comparison to Mad Cow. It IS OBVIOUS that Rachel Mad Cow is more educated than you, as most people are. You really don’t need to prove it to us every day.

        “woof woof” = you stink

  • U571

    Boy that EYES SCREWED SHUT person is some kind of “looney tunes” huh?

    hey Eyes, “woof” “woof”

Bottom
close[X]

Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to PersonalLiberty.com,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.