No Duh, Feinstein! Dem Senator Breaks With Obama To Back ‘Keep Your Coverage’ Bill

0 Shares

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) is breaking rank with the Obama Administration by throwing her support behind a bill that would require insurers to continue offering coverage to current customers who are happy with their existing health plans.

Feinstein said today she’s co-sponsoring legislation introduced by Senator Mary Landrieu (D-La.) because, well, it forces the Obama Administration to honor the President’s infamous –and broken – promise that, under Obamacare, people could keep their coverage if they liked it.

“This bill provides a simple fix to a complex problem,” Feinstein said Tuesday in a statement supporting the measure, which would require insurers to honor their current policies “indefinitely.”

Here’s the full text of that statement (H/T: San Francisco Chronicle):

I have decided to cosponsor Senator Mary Landrieu’s (D-La.) legislation: Keeping the Affordable Care Act Promise Act. This bill provides a simple fix to a complex problem. This bill will extend the grandfather date for individual insurance plans so that individuals who have insurance policies they like can keep them indefinitely, unless the individual chooses another plan or the insurer stops providing health insurance in the individual market.

Specifically, the bill requires the following:

· Insurance companies must continue to offer—indefinitely—all currently existing insurance plans as of December 31, 2013, on the individual market;

· Future renewal notices must clearly inform customers they have the choice to keep their current plan or shop for insurance in a health exchange, such as Covered California; and

· Insurance companies must clearly state why the plan does not meet new minimum benefit standards.

Since the beginning of September, I have received 30,842 calls, emails and letters from Californians, many of whom are very distressed by cancellations of their insurance policies and who are facing increased out-of-pocket costs.

For example, a father from Rancho Mirage called and said: ‘I work three jobs to pay the bills for my wife and daughter. I got a letter that my plan is going from $420 to $943. I went to HealthCare.Gov, then Covered California. I researched my premiums. A policy almost identical to my old one is being offered for $863. I’m now being forced to come up with over $400 a month with 30 days’ notice. Let me spell it out: I do not have the income to afford this.’

Too many Americans are struggling to make ends meet. We must ensure that in our effort to reform the health care system, we do not allow unintended consequences to go unaddressed.

I believe consumers should be allowed to choose their plans, and they should be adequately informed about those choices. Consumers must be told what their coverage does and does not include so families don’t find themselves paying for an insurance policy they believe is comprehensive when in fact it is not.

The Affordable Care Act is a good law, but it is not perfect. I believe the Landrieu bill is a commonsense fix that will protect individuals in the private insurance market from being forced to change their insurance plan. I hope Congress moves quickly to enact it.

Personal Liberty

Ben Bullard

Reconciling the concept of individual sovereignty with conscientious participation in the modern American political process is a continuing preoccupation for staff writer Ben Bullard. A former community newspaper writer, Bullard has closely observed the manner in which well-meaning small-town politicians and policy makers often accept, unthinkingly, their increasingly marginal role in shaping the quality of their own lives, as well as those of the people whom they serve. He argues that American public policy is plagued by inscrutable and corrupt motives on a national scale, a fundamental problem which individuals, families and communities must strive to solve. This, he argues, can be achieved only as Americans rediscover the principal role each citizen plays in enriching the welfare of our Republic.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

  • Russell Vanderpool

    YA ALL YOU DEMATARDS SHOULD OF READ THE BILL BEFORE PASSING IT….

    • fahkir1

      Reminds me of a stool sample. You have to PASS it to see whats in it.

      • Muffin Man Mashinksy

        Not really, Big F….those who did not drink the Kool-Aid & know what the LOONY TUNES LIBs are capable of, knew BEFORE it was passed that is sucked!!

      • Muffin Man Mashinksy

        Not really, Big F….those who did not drink the Kool-Aid & know what the LOONY TUNES LIBs are capable of, knew BEFORE it was passed that is sucked!!

    • 5live5

      Uh, first they’d have to be ABLE to!!!

    • KennyLLC

      All 10,000 pages ?
      I think it should have been sent to Guantanamo as a CIA torturing mechanism.

      • Muffin Man Mashinksy

        10,000 pages???….NAH, it’s over 20,000 now!

        • KennyLLC

          You mean they FINALLY got around to finishing the first copy !?

          • Muffin Man Mashinksy

            It’s the gift that keeps on giving….to Big Pharma & Big Insurers & Tort Lawyers, etc….

        • MariansMusings

          The 20,000+ pages are regulations (which do not have to go through congress.) These are in addition to the bill itself (which I downloaded right after it was passed.) See more about the regs at MusingsbyMarian d o t c o m

    • $24100174

      Frankenswine is another pelosi in a different bodysuit…shame on her.

  • slrassoc

    It was designed to have all policies cancelled otherwise obama care would not work. Not enough people would sign up for it cause of the cost plus the rising deductabes. It can’t be fixed, only repealed.

    • Sunwukong68

      Think about it…people are losing their insurance, so they are forced to try Obummercare…I imagine the inside trading tips Congress knew about have something to do with the names of the insurance companies that will benefit the most from this fiasco…and which ones to sell stock as well. Does the word SCAM sound less like this?

      • Muffin Man Mashinksy

        Carney Full ‘O Blarney said today, “Obama is doing everything he can to honor his pledge that people can keep their insurance”…so how come he can’t pick up his pen & sign off on another illegal provision change in Obummercare? Or even back this law? Because as you say, if kicked off they will have to go to the exchanges & that is what they want, so it looks like the law is working!

        There has never been a more uncaring evil prez & a more satanic wasteful corrupt boondoggle than ObummerCare

        • Elton Robb

          what about all the wars we’ve been involved with?

          • Sunwukong68

            Same idea…and BIG PHARMA too! Corruption is on both sides of this government thing.

          • Sunwukong68

            Just wondering how many here realize that we have had wars and “police action” with all of the last few presidents (Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, and Obama). And you will hear of wars and rumors of wars. See that you are not troubled; for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet…Matthew 24:6

          • chesed1

            Yep, just trying to figure out if we are getting towards the end of the birth-bangs. Russia, China, Syria, and Iran (all the mess in the Middle East.)

          • Robert Messmer

            Pretty much all of the 20th century was wars and police actions: the police action (UN sponsored) in Korea 1950 and still ongoing. Then of course all the new ones since then.

          • Muffin Man Mashinksy

            Hey, Obummer is the guy that accelerated war in Afghanistan & drones throughout the world….Bush: 43 drone strikes in 8 years, Obummer over 500 in less than 5 years….he is committing War Crimes!

          • real talk 1

            Yea what about them nobody seems to care, not when we as a nation allow a creep to rule over the country so many paid with their lives to make this a fair and free place to live and raise a family and it allows for creeps such as the regime in Washington.

        • real talk 1

          You are as right as the mail and I do respect the founding fathers for the resilience in crafting a very workable document, where they went wrong they left the door open for a damned fool and they also gave him to much power look at the damage this guy is allowed to inflict on the nation . This should never be aloud no matter the office holder and his minions we have over three million people and we have to allow a fool to run this nation into the ground like it or not.

      • MariansMusings

        Many of the insurance companies were not able to get on the site to register to provide insurance. Fancy that!!!

  • fahkir1

    People, people, people. Stop calling obutheadcare a train wreck. Call it what it really is. A SUICIDE ATTACK! It is designed to do only one thing. Bring the downfall of this once great nation. We are headed to become the next new country. The U.S.S.A. The United Socialist States of Amerika.

    • MariansMusings

      So very true. Thank you. See my Feinstein analysis at MusingsbyMarian d o t c o m

    • MariansMusings

      So very true. Thank you. See my Feinstein analysis at MusingsbyMarian d o t c o m

  • joe1cr

    Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Senator Mary Landrieu (D-La.) have smelled the coffee way to late and because they do not want the republicians to control the Senate.

    • 5live5

      Are they up for reelection??? If so, they’re worried about their JOBS!!!

      • Sunwukong68

        Feinstein is the epitome of career politicians…been in them since the 1950’s…she should have been OUT since the 1960’s. She represents my state too…I voted for her once, when I was young and naive…

        • Elton Robb

          I agree.

          • Robert Messmer

            You know what they say, “If you are a Republican before age 30 you have no heart and if you are a Democrat after age 30 you have no brain.”

          • Elton Robb

            Actually, I wish democrats before age 30 had hearts and brains. :) I wonder what they call libertarians?

          • Robert Messmer

            Those without representation.

        • chesed1

          Oh Lord help us, laughing I have a couple, still in, from MD that I voted for when I was young and foolish! I want to hope the youth are smarter but somehow or another I don’t think so! Lord help us!

        • real talk 1

          Now vote her out.

      • LZ

        That’s exactly what I said above….they are only doing this to protect their re-election, not because it’s the right thing to do. They are so disgusting!!! There are seven of them…they are the ones who met with dumbo at the white house.

      • real talk 1

        What else?

        • 5live5

          real talk 1, that is what I’ve been saying all along. the only time they listen to their constituents is if the are worried about their job! Any other time? FORGET YOU N ME!!!

    • Deerinwater

      I’d come near thinking, ~ they are attempting to address a problem that’s significance has been brought to their attention and they are going about making corrections as anyone might expect them too.

      And the Republicans are not going to control the Senate but they can certainly try anyway. I would expect them to do no less.

      • joe1cr

        No republicans voted for Obamacare ,they read the awful Pelosi
        pass it to know what’s in it bill . The Socialist liberals like Landrieu who took Reid’s back door deals and voted yes are now facing reelection in the red states. How in the HELL can Democrat’s pass a law with out knowing if it is going to good or bad for their constituents they represent. Americans do not need these IDIOTS that can not write nor read their own bills.
        After this Liberal fiasco ,when the dust settles in 2014 we will have a new president of the Senate and he/she will be a REPUBLICIAN !!!

        • Deerinwater

          maybe so, but the Senate will be lead by democrats and maybe congress as well.

        • macgyver1948

          joe1cr…. The Republicans who voted against ObamaCare did so because they were ordered to. How many of them do you think read Ocare before they voted? I bet many of the Dems who voted for it might not have read it all either and just went by what they were told but many Dems do not “Take” orders when it comes to voting in Congress, they do not sign no-way-out-or-else conflict-of-interest pledges as the
          majority of the GOP have, over 270 of them in Congress.

          One more thing Joe1cr… Unless you are either very wealthy or a large Corporations you do not care about your own, and/or, your family’s economic futures if you are hoping for “…,when the dust settles in 2014 we will have a new president of the Senate and he/she will be
          a REPUBLICIAN !!!”. No Tea for me thank you.

          • joe1cr

            17 trillion in debt, raising the debt ceiling, more spending, bad loans for green energy companies, and killing of manufacturing,coal and oil industries jobs by Obama’s EPA . What the above has not kill off Obamacare will take care of the rest of it. You are not worried about the future of your or your family’s economic futures as the democrats spend it daily with out accountably to anyone. As far as the Republicans
            pledging to not raise taxes and supporting the Constitution I have no problems with that. But you seem to have no problem with the socialist liberals getting their talking points and their marching orders every morning gutting the constitution and obeying your Dictator in chief .

          • macgyver1948

            joe1cr…The debt is huge, no doubt, but it has been accumulating for a very long time. Every president adds to the debt, all of them. Government costs
            money and that is a fact however you choose to look at it.

            In 1992, perhaps as a result of a suggestion by President Ronald Reagan, the GOP tried to put through their version of a National Health Care
            plan. It it ware things such as the dreaded Mandate. IT failed because it sucked for America. Now when ObamaCare went to House Committee for acceptance the GOP in that Committee demanded some of their things, including the GOP Mandate, have to be included or they would see to it ObamaCare will fail. Twice I heard Obama say he did
            not want those items added to The Affordable Care Act but he had no choice if he wants a health care plan in process. Reagan knew it was necessary but we need a good one and that might happen with OCare if it can be reworked and the “bad” stuff taken out. It is the law so we should work to fix it and not make things worse by putting it down.

            Green energy in theory is a very good thing. We need to get away from fossil fuels and considering how the Oil Companies are raping us at the gas pumps and in the heating bills we NEED to work of better ways.

            There are so many big corporations in our country operating nicely in the black, meaning they are doing well. Sending jobs overseas is killing employment here. We need livable wages, starting pays, and the
            Corporations will not raise their low pay jobs if they are not mandated to just like the non-ethical corporations will not clean up their messes to the environment and our food products if they aren’t
            forced to – regulated.

            Agencies such as the EPA are needed badly or we will all have to wear gas masks and boil all drinking and cooking water. The food the FDA approves, processed foods and the care and feeding of live stock, is making the food look nicer at the food stores but the diseases they cause will only get worse as we get more and more Monsantoized (it is
            my word so don’t look for it but I bet you understand). There are so many manufacturing companies who will opt for the cheaper ways and
            methods, to lower their expenses, even if what they offer is dangerous to our health. Sugar substitutes, such as Aspartame and others, are really disease-causing and the FDA is allowing all this. The drugs that are approved are getting in under the steadily rising acceptable risk bar and we can see that in the disclaimers included on drug TV commercials. We need to stop this.

            In general if there were no regs the, a thing your TPGOP is fighting for as closely as they can get, we will become a more so diseased and weak spices assuming we survive. I bet people like you would like to eliminate the warning labels on tobacco products as the Tobacco Industry would like. How the Tobacco Industry is still a legal entity I will never understand except for all the taxes they pay, all the
            campaign funding they contribute, all the other industries their poison feeds, like the Pharmaceutical Industry and others. See, economics is why government is allowing the Tobacco Industry to still
            exist and there are many GOP supporting them.

            In short, it is all for the benefit and protection of the Corporations eliminating regulations and lowering corporate taxes and payroll that the TPGOP is working for. I am not saying Dems do not do this to some extent as well but at least the Dems are also trying to protect us, we, the non-affluent, are just tools and equipment to the Corporations and collective tax payers to the government, individual
            we are not that important to the government if we are not a big corporation or a big tax payer.

            In short if we non-affluent do not band together, both sides of the aisle, we will lose what the Constitution and the Revolutionary war was there for an achieved. Then when we accomplish what is needed for us we can go back to the political parties we choose to support but we have to reform Government in the process. Less benefits, put
            Congress on Social Security instead of the expensive retirement plan we pay for (I bet you would see Social Security fixed in a nano second if that happens), and their health care, also the best,
            changed to the same as ours – even put them on ObamaCare, for the elected and agencies.

            In summary I would like to see Congress and the President be subjected to the same laws and benefits as they subject us to. What I am
            suggesting is some ways to cut spending.

            Joe1cr, you say “ As far as the Republicans
            pledging to not raise taxes and supporting the Constitution I have no problems with that”.

            Ok, but that Norquist pledge is like a huge ice burg, it is not just what it says in the short form of it. If you research what is behind it you will see those over 270 GOP signers have to do as they are told,
            as in voting and supporting, or their careers will be toast – a Norquist quote actually. You would see that, and many other scary things that have a hold on your GOP, if you research what Norquist says about the pledge and signers but first you have to want to find the truth.

            Now the “supporting the Constitution I have no problems with that” part. I am fine with the Constitution, In fact I took an oath to protect it when I joined the Air Force. My problem is how those on
            the Right are being told to define the Constitution and how they avoid the reality of changes as time goes by. I want the 2nd Amendment strong and I want Freedom OF Speech and Freedom OF Religion (totally non-specific to any religion as it was intended when ratified and included) to always protect, all people equally no matter what their religion . It will not work to allow interest business without rules. Different states have different laws so there would be conflict. I could go on but there are way to many reasons why the Constitution has to keep up with the times and why we need
            regulations. To ignore the need for regulations will ONLY benefit the Big Corporations and those in Congress who are in business to pretty exclusively support and protect the corporations and will be happy, not us.

            I will ignore your last sentence which begins with “But you seem to have no problem with…” because you do not have the ability to know, al;though so many on the Right seem to think they do, what anyone has a problem with or not if you do not know them and it is all a load pf cr*ap.

          • joe1cr

            By ignoring my last sentence all of your above statements about the constitution/the bill of rights and your false history of Reagan health care are POPPYCOCK !!!
            In 1992, perhaps as a result of a suggestion by President Ronald Reagan, the GOP tried to put through their version of a National Health Care plan.
            Where do you get your facts at ? In 1992 the Clintons tried to pass Hillary healthcare, not Reagan and not the republicans, as Reagan knew this was the a step
            towards communism .
            All by the way I also took the Oath when I joined the Army.
            “I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.” (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

            “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. BUT IT CANNOT SURVIVE TREASON FROM WITHIN. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But THE TRAITOR MOVES AMONGST THOSE WITHIN THE GATE FREELY, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of GOVERNMENT itself. FOR THE TRAITOR APPEARS NOT A TRAITOR; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, HE APPEALS TO THE BASENESS THAT LIES DEEP IN THE HEARTS OF ALL MEN. HE ROTS THE SOUL OF A NATION, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A MURDERER IS LESS TO FEAR. THE TRAITOR IS THE PLAGUE.”

            Marcus Tullius Cicero
            (106-43 B.C.) Roman Statesman, Philosopher and Orator
            Source:

            Attributed. 58 BC, Speech in the Roman Senate

          • macgyver1948

            joe1cr… Are my statements “POPPYCOCK !!!” because I say what you do not want to hear? The only reason I did not really comment on your last sentence, in that last post from you to me, is because you assume you can “But you seem to have no problem with the socialist liberals getting their talking points and their marching orders every morning gutting the constitution and obeying your Dictator in chief”. You just assume way too much here and so much of your assumptions are wrong. You cannot know how people think but what they think so you, like so many on the Right, deserve no credibility for those kinds of statements. Again, how could you know what I have problems with or not?

            In his early years he says “Ronald Reagan Speaks Out Against Socialized Medicine is a 1961 LP featuring Ronald Reagan. In this more than ten-minute recording, Reagan “criticized Social Security for supplanting private savings and warned that subsidized medicine would curtail Americans’
            freedom” and that “pretty soon your son won’t decide when he’s in school, where he will go or what he will do for a living. He will wait for the government to tell him.”.

            Another assumption on a Right thinker’s part who is ignoring reality to some extent. All too often low waged people cannot afford a decent savings so they hope Social Security will help support them when they retire. After all it is their money to begin with from when it was taken out of their earned pay checks. I would hate for me to get so dependent on
            anything the Government is offering but that is just me. Did you expect to hear that from a Liberal? So many Liberals feel that way. The TPGOP wants to and is working toward eliminating or at least
            reducing what SSI recipients get. Shows they do not care about retirees and the elderly – at least.

            How would you explain the GOP’s attempts at Government run National Health Care for some time, early 1990’s and more recently? Aren’t those Socialist moves according the Conservative Right? Romney did it too for Massachusetts and so many of them do not like his Mandate and other things.

            Try these and learn about the Mandate and the GOP attempt at Government run National Health Care, unless history that conflicts with what you
            choose to believe, or were told to believe, bothers you.

            “The Tortuous History of Conservatives and the Individual Mandate”
            http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2012/02/07/the-tortuous-conservative-history-of-the-individual-mandate/

            And:

            “Republicans were for President Obama’s requirement that Americans get health
            insurance before they were against it.

            The obligation in the new health care law is a Republican idea that’s been around at least two decades. It was once trumpeted as an
            alternative to Bill and Hillary Clinton’s failed health care overhaul in the 1990s. These days, Republicans call it government overreach.

            Mitt Romney,weighing another run for the Republican presidential nomination, signed such a requirement into law at the state level as
            Massachusetts governor in 2006. At the time, Romney defended it as “a personal responsibility principle” and Massachusetts’ newest Republican senator, Scott Brown, backed it. Romney now says Obama’s plan is a federal takeover that bears little resemblance to what he did as governor and should be repealed”. More at
            http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/03/27/republicans-hatched-idea-obamas-health-insurance-mandate/

            Yes, Bill Clinton tried a Health Care plan in 1993, no doubt about that. I bet many of us remember that.

            Joe1cr, do you really believe things that are needed to help deserving and qualified people, such as Social Security, Medicare and National Health care are “a step toward Communism”? Really? I guess you too on your side can see only the dark and dismal side when it comes to helping people. WOW, no compassion in you either!!! Does the word
            in Social Security, “Social”, really scares you. I wonder if you ever “Social”ize with family and friends. LOL.

            So, we both told each other we each took that oath when we entered the service. Good for us. I still live by it.

            Your last paragraph, the quote by Marcus Tullius Cicero (106-43 B.C.) Roman Statesman, Philosopher and Orator Source:

            Attributed. 58 BC, Speech in the Roman Senate”.

            I agree and that is why I am fearful of the Tea Party. Hitler did the thing “he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, HE APPEALS TO THE BASENESS THAT LIES DEEP IN THE HEARTS OF ALL MEN. HE ROTS THE SOUL OF A NATION, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the
            city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A MURDERER IS LESS TO FEAR. THE TRAITOR IS THE PLAGUE” and I see it again here by Tea. Thank you for sharing it as a reminder even though we see it all the time.

          • joe1cr

            Right back at you on judging me.

          • macgyver1948

            joe1cr… I am not judging you, I do not know you and that is my point but you Right guys think you are beyond that point in how you guys word things. You guys seem to think, by your wording, you can decide what other people are really saying and really believing and really thinking. I was only commenting on your wording.

      • 5live5

        Deer, you still singing the praises of the liberal pukes??? That’s just plain crap man!!!

        • Deerinwater

          No need to praise someone for doing what they are suppose to do I would think.

          It seems that you are prong to embellishment to the point of being inaccurate.

          • 5live5

            And after OHbummer care, both will have a change of LEADERSHIP!

      • Robert Messmer

        I’m thinking that the corrections should have been made while the Democrats were devising and then passing the bill.

    • Robert Messmer

      Landrieu is up for re-election in 2014; Feinstein is good through 2018. She is obviously supporting the bill because the ladies need to put up a united front in the good ole boys club in the Democrat party. That and she claimed over 30,000 complaints from her constituents. Have to do “something” to keep those loyal contributions coming in. Hopefully we will now get to see Obama, Reid, and Pelosi refer to them as “arsonists”, “anarchists” and “terrorists” like they did when it was the other side of the aisle fighting ACA.

      • joe1cr

        Their short term fix is only to try to salvage the 2014 elections, once that is over Americans still get shafted with Obamacare, his motive is quite obvious when we just went through a government shutdown because Obama and the Democrats refused to fix anything wrong with Obamacare.

      • joe1cr

        Their short term fix is only to try to salvage the 2014 elections, once that is over Americans still get shafted with Obamacare, their motive is quite obvious when we just went through a government shutdown because Obama and the Democrats refused to fix anything wrong with Obamacare.

        Aesop’s moral: Clothes and lies may disguise a fool, but his words will give him away.

  • shimaiden

    This bill is meant to put the blame on the insurance companies and off of them, they made this mess they should have live with it or clean it up theirselves.

  • Sunwukong68

    It’s amazing that Obama’s strongest supporters are distancing themselves quick…Clinton scolds Obama, Feinstein jumps the Obamaship on Obummercare…who’s next? Somehow, I kind of feel sorry for his kids…they’re the victims. I imagine they have never known any better dad…but I know from my own experience, narcissistic dads who care only about their own ego are not good to be around in the long run.

    • Warrior

      They are ALL fully aware of what was in it from the beginning. Useless progressives are in for some “skin” saving treatments right now. Believe me, these treatments only last until the day after election then the mask falls off AGAIN! Disgusting people. Absolutely Disgusting. Trash this damn thing and put these criminals behind bars where the belong. This whole progressive wet dream has been nothing but fraud and lies from the get go.

  • James Grey

    Senator Dianne Feinstein really fought for a BILL she NEVER read. WHY? Are they getting paid to do this kind of a job? VOTE for stupid Bills and NEVER read it. She is a real dummy and should be replaced. This Obamacare could Bankrupt America and NEVER be worth anything for anyone. SHE VOTED FOR THIS, NEVER READ IT.

    • KennyLLC

      Just another Demming dingbat from California who wanted it passed to “see what’s in it”…like a gigantic stool sample.

  • Wambli525

    Now is Feinstein doing this because it is the right thing to do OR is it because her constituency (Voters) are discovering what is in the O’care bill.

    Here is a clue … if it is the right thing to do then she should have never voted for the bill in the first place. Democrat politicians are SLIMEY creatures

    • Sunwukong68

      Like newts…they like to blend into the environment…and look like a lizard…but they’re slimy, and will turn on you quick.

  • hank

    Does she finally see the light? or is this more of her underhanded Politica !!!!

    • chesed1

      A couple innocent looking unless-es: “unless the individual chooses another plan or the insurer stops providing health insurance in the individual market.” My gut tells me this is just a temporary fix that will only put off the inevitable reality of the exchange, hope I am wrong, or that the other bill that is in the works is better.

  • KennyLLC

    The ferris wheel has already hit the road, and the county fair is nearly over.
    It’s a little late for the dog-and-pony show, don’t you think ?
    You can leave the Whack a Rat set up a little longer though !

  • SSMcDonald

    Vermin like Finestain voted for Obamacare; what’s her complaint??? The people of California deserve what they get after electing vermin.

    • KennyLLC

      Does federal health care law have a choom clause providing for her medical marijuana ?
      Maybe that’s why she’s piping up now.

    • Sunwukong68

      I’m in California…didn’t vote for her. I did once, when I was young.

      • Scott

        Me too – What a horrible mistake that was

      • real talk 1

        If you were then young why is the old lady still there?

  • squeeze127

    Just like rats jumping off the Titanic! Love it. Hold there feet to the fire and scorch them.

  • 1462

    Please I hope no one is FOOLISH Enough to believe this NAZI Frankenstien

    is doing this out of the goodness of her cold Socialist Communist Marxist New World Order Tyranical Treaonist heart!!!! Did someone say Re election is comming up?????? Then once back in office she will go become the Hitloeresque puppet her NWO Controllers want her to be …….

    Obama is a known proven Criminal Fraud USURPER and as such Under Article 1 Section 7 Clause 2 As long as a FRAUD USURPS the office of President Congress and the Senate can make and pass no laws!!! AND if they do all they do is NULL and VOID!!!! NOR Does the Senate possess the power to Ratify!!!

    Additionally in case no one is aware because the Bought and paid for Criminal assistance of Main Stream Media….who is keeping you in total darkness as to what is going on…..

    No laws of Congress are valid
    “Congress can pass no law while a usurper pretends to occupy “the Office of President.”
    The Constitution provides that “[e]very Bill which shall have passed
    the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a
    Law, be presented to the President of the United States” (Article I, Section 7, Clause 2). Not to a usurper posturing as “the President of the United States,” but to the true and rightful President. If no such true and rightful President occupies the White House, no “Bill” will or can, “before it become a Law, be presented to [him].” If no “Bill” is so presented, no “Bill” will or can become a
    “Law.” And any purported “Law” that the usurper “approve[s]” and
    “sign[s],” or that Congress passes over the usurper’s “Objections,” will
    be a nullity. Thus, if Obama deceitfully “enters office” as an usurper,
    Congress will be rendered effectively impotent for as long as it
    acquiesces in his pretenses as “President.”” And

    Obama Could not be Removed Except by Force

    As a USURPER posturing as “the President,” Congress cannot even impeach
    Obama because, not being the actual President, he cannot be “removed
    from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or
    other high Crimes and Misdemeanors” (see Article II, Section 4). In
    that case, some other public officials would have to arrest him—with
    physical force, if he would not go along quietly—in order to prevent him
    from continuing his imposture. Obviously, this could possibly lead to
    armed conflicts within the General Government itself, or among the
    States and the people. BUT IT NEEDS TO HAPPEN IF WE ARE TO SAVE HER!
    America.

    Bear in mind, that as an imposter Commander–in-Chief of the Armed Forces, “he will be entitled to no obedience whatsoever from anyone in those Armed forces and Law Enforcment.Indeed, for officers or men to follow any of his purported “orders” including law enforcement will constitute a serious breach of military discipline—and in extreme circumstances perhaps even “war crimes.” In addition, no one in any civilian agency in the Executive Branch of
    the General Government will be required to put into effect any of
    Obama’s purported “proclamations,” “executive orders,” or “directives”
    (Viera, J.).

    These two letters are from Judge Dale…. I
    warn you that if your not open to wanting to hear the truth stop
    here…

    http://lucas2012infos.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/judge-dale-retd-the-missing-13th-amendment-17-april-2013/#more-48879

    http://angellucci.wordpress.com/2013/04/15/oppt-in-the-sovereign-citizen-by-judge-dale-retired/

    DICK ACT of 1902… CAN’T BE REPEALED (GUN CONTROL FORBIDDEN) – Protection Against Tyrannical Government

    http://www.knowthelies.com/?q=node/3949

    http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/11/barack-obama-accused-crimes-humanity/

    http://conservativebyte.com/2013/11/criminal-terror-charges-filed-obama/

    • Robert Messmer

      1462 please get back on your meds. You say “Obama is a known proven Criminal Fraud USURPER”. What court was this proven in and when? How did the appeal turn out?

      “DICK ACT of 1902… CAN’T BE REPEALED” Any law can be amended and/or repealed. We have even done it with an Amendment to the Constitution. Prohibition was put into law with an Amendment and taken out the same way.

  • dcwc16

    What good does it do to pass a bill that cannot be enforced. We are talking private business being forced to reinstate coverage that the government mandated be ended. Lets face it, she new from the beginning people would lose their coverage and Obama was lying, but it was ok till they got caught now she is pleading ignorance and offering pointless solutions. Unless she calls for complete repeal she is just protecting her own butt.

    • Deerinwater

      I don’t know , who knew what and when. ~ We all create goals that we aspire too. While falling short of our goals is not completely unheard of. ~ We might have to back up or circle the block to get where we want to go.

      On occasions, more now than ever, ~ I drive my senior parents around. ~ While the thing is, ~ they refuse to be just passengers, ~ they tell me how to drive, what lane to get in , when to turn, when to stop and when to go and how fast or slow to go. . They get extremely excited when I don’t go or do “exactly” as they say. ~While it’s not always completely clear what they are saying as I negotiate traffic and attempt to follow their “Instructions” .

      They really don’t really need to be “driven” anywhere. ~With such an attitude and demand for complete control , they really need to drive themselves rather then beating me up with their senility and dysfunctional behavior.

      I’m left to remind them of that and that this Cadillac North Star is equipped with both fine brakes and excellent steering, 2nd to none. And that we will get to where they wish to go in record time and creature comfort but they need to allow just one person to drive the car. ~ If the car has to circle the block to get there safely ~ I consider that as acceptable. There is no need for all the “Drama” and “Anger”

      This Reform will go through a “shakedown” process , you can count of it. We might have to circle the block several times.

      I’m not suggest, we not protest, or call out all the many failures but please keep it in perspective.

      • dcwc16

        Dear deerinwater, If I understand you correctly you hate old people, like Cadillac’s and find it perfectly fine for politicians to lie to the people they represent and everything is fine for you and eventually they will figure it out, while in the mean time they will destroy the economy by sucking disposable income from families, put more people out of work, more people food stamps, provide excuses and provide lousy coverage and in general continue as they have for the last five years. And you think old people are too controlling and demented.

        • Deerinwater

          Well ~ I think that you misunderstood. ` my point being, ~ we can change things ~ we can correct, there are devises to do it with.

          As far as seniors, ~ I’m 65 and hardly a sprout. ~ There no need for overreacting. ~ It doesn’t serve any grand purpose to over react for anyone.

          I deal with seniors on a regular bases. ~It comes with the position I hold, maybe you don’t enjoy hearing me talk about them. ` if you can’t find the humor, ~ i’m not sure of what to tell you. Everything about life is not necessarily pretty, warm and fuzzy.

          I’m not talking about your parents but mine. I feel safe in doing so.

          Mother’s TV and satellite went off line tonight. ~ i don’t claim to know much about such things.

          But I attempt to be helpful when I can, i have a honey -do list waiting for me every morning. Yesterday it was lite pilots, change light bulbs and fix TV’s. ~ no big deal.

          ~ These New flat screens have awful sound qualities if you have noticed. ~ Working with three remotes, I managed to get everything rebooted and back on line. ~ how? , i’m not exactly sure.

          The receiver to boost audio ` is failing and not dependable,~ doing what it wants to do, when it wants to do it. I told mother we could get her a simple tower receiver/speaker unit to replace it. ~ That it would be simpler to operate and take up less space.

          With which she says, ~ “well I don’t like “different”, I like what i’m use too.”

          “well mother, I understand but they don’t make a new 30 year old stereo anymore.” ~ maybe you should shop it yourself .” ~

          Since father’s passing, ~ I’ve had to fill in offering her a hard time. She needs it I suppose, ~ I wan’t aware that father had such a hard job until now.

          66 years of Co-dependence creates it own kind of dysfunction behavior and you just have to roll with the flow.

          And a footnote here,
          The economy was 5 years destroyed by October 2008 dwcw16. ~ you might want to back up and catch up.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_crisis_of_2007%E2%80%9308

          • Robert Messmer

            I understand from a “Tech Byte” article that they have or soon will have a speaker that you simply apply right to the screen. The claim is that it produces excellent sound.

          • Robert Messmer

            I understand from a “Tech Byte” article that they have or soon will have a speaker that you simply apply right to the screen. The claim is that it produces excellent sound.

      • Don in Ohio

        @Deer, Do you ever look in the mirror and say to yourself “I’m the smartest person in the world.”??
        That’s the way you come across on here supporting the crap the Dems/libs are doing. You appear to be annoyed by your own parents, what a bunch of dribble.

      • Don in Ohio

        @Deer, Do you ever look in the mirror and say to yourself “I’m the smartest person in the world.”??
        That’s the way you come across on here supporting the crap the Dems/libs are doing. You appear to be annoyed by your own parents, what a bunch of dribble.

        • Deerinwater

          no Don in Ohio ~ I never do that or think that.

          And my parents are very annoying at times ~ so you are half right.

          That I am correct more times than not, is no accident. ~ when you start using your head for something beside just a hat rack you will see a marked improvement in reasoning as well. ~

          Learn to not be so easily offended and forcing your will on others.

          What you think, is up to you and has little to do with me.

      • Robert Messmer

        It is change, but not a “Reform”.

    • Diana

      Well said you are 100% right!

  • 10-Nov-1775

    What will happen is what always happens–they will come up with another argument to support what they unsupported after they supported it–after the election. Just like their promises with taxes–give us a dollar in tax today, and we will give you three dollars in cuts “later”. Sigh, later never comes. And then they do it again.
    Why are there idiots in government? Because the people keep voting for them.

    • Sunwukong68

      Perhaps they are not idiots after all…the voters are the idiots. I did not vote for the current POTUS…too bad more people don’t vote for non-Dem/non-Rep and get a third and fourth party in power.

  • jlnsr

    Ms. Feinstein should have read this monstrosity before she blindly supported it. The rats are hoping their belated support for a “fix” of the rediculous bill they enacted will satisfy the people who voted them into office, It is nothing more than a blatent attempt to appease their voters so they can get re-elected for another six years so they can once again sell them out and do what they want to do.

    Unfortunately for Californians it will probably work like it did for Dirty Harry in Nevada. California needs new blood in Sacramento and in Washington. Will the California political machine and Democratic National committe have enough money to get her re-elected. California may be getting tired of the tax and spend policies of their elected officials. At least, I hope so.

    • Don in Ohio

      Feinstein is in office until 2019!!!
      She is 80 years old now, so she will be 85 by then and good riddance!

      • Robert Messmer

        Oops sorry Don I need to scroll down to see if someone else has taken care of the situation. Thank You!

    • MariansMusings

      Very good analysis. Would love to have your remarks on my analysis of Feinstein at MusingsbyMarian d o t c o m

    • Robert Messmer

      I think she is not up for re-election until 2018.

  • Deerinwater

    Sounds like a reasonable solution to resolve some peoples disappointment with this new reform. ~ I would like to think, ~ there will be more coming as the need arises.

    I have never considered it a “finished product”, as such matters as funding and providing health care evolved over many years and are fairly complex as well as diverse. I would never expect a “One Size fits all ” solution.

    Bill Clinton is saying much the say thing as Senator Mary Landrieu, The President need to make his words be true, ~ if it’s possible to do.

    If people don’t want a policy that comes up to these new standards, preferring what they had, ~ it should be their option to keep it or upgrade.

    • MariansMusings

      Speaking of Bill Clinton, remember the proposed Hillary Care? It was even worse because they were upfront about the government choosing your policy AND your doctor. That’s why the public sent a resounding NO message. Obama learned from that–hence the duplicity. For more on why the so-called solution isn’t going to happen check my thoughts on MusingsbyMarian d o t c o m

      • Deerinwater

        hmm? ~ well actually they didn’t. Not enough of them anyway.

        http://my.firedoglake.com/jbade/2013/09/28/the-heritage-foundation-designed-obamacare-to-preclude-single-payer-republicans-win-again/

        The Heritage Foundation Designed Obamacare to Preclude Single Payer.Republicans Win Again!By: jbade Saturday September 28, 2013 11:25 am

        Obamacare was/is the invention of the hard right.It was born in the Heritage Foundation in the early 1990′s as an alternative to single payer, should the establishment ever be threatened by single payer. the Republicans introduced it as a bill in 1993. Bob Dole ran on Obamacare in 1996 and Mitt enacted it in Mass. in the early 2000′s.

        Although Obamcare does offer corporate health coverage for some who have none, it does not lower costs in a meaningful way. and the same bargain you give away any chance of single payer as you write into law, through mandate, corporate control of the health system. The opposite of medicare/caid single payer ect.

        Healthcare costs will never go down significantly under Obamacare because their corporate profits are tied to them. Get it.

        The importance of this issue can not be overstated because all the austerity both parties forward would be unnecessary if we had single payer system like any other industrialized country. Lowering our healthcare costs to the 11 to 13 percent that these countries pay ,almost brings our national account into balance-that’s how big the healthcare costs are as a piece of the pie. Those costs are now and will continue to be the basis for their “austerity measures”.

        These are the same Democracts and Republicans who voted to make it illegal(because it was legal) the re importation of prescription drugs. This precluded the american taxpayer from 100′s of billions in savings, even more 100′s of billions savings for consumers through the re-import of drugs manufactured here and sold to the world at 10 cents on the dollar.Stop and think. Would a group of individuals who would do that EVER try and lower your health costs? You cant be that stupid. Yet this Obamacare scheme, designed by these same people, that turns over the system to a handful of corporations is reasonable. I dont get it.

        The only reasonable course of action is to oppose Obamcare, what will when implemented be, the end of any hope of single payer and ending of their stated cause for austerity. I say single payer is worth fighting for. It is the great equalizer. The more rich share your healthcare system, the better it will be. The more separated, the worse your healthcare will be. If they, their kids go to same doctors hospitals as you your kids, you will have good healthcare.

        Obamacare separates you from that bond that assures good healthcare. The american people across the political spectrum endorsed a public option in huge numbers over 70%, even republicans. The president isolated the part of the party supporting a public option, a majority of the party and forwarded the the right-wing agenda of handing more and more power to a select few parasitic corporations. Thats worth fighting against.

        • MariansMusings

          You are obviously well read and have raised some really interesting points. If I understand your underlying theme, Republicans have contributed to the problems. You get no argument there from me because I am not one. I am an independent who is often forced to hold my nose and vote for a Republican because the Democrat candidate is off the chart Marxist left. Nixon, after all, created EPA. Rather than defending the sins of one party by showing the other has done worse, can we agree that change is badly needed on both sides of the aisle? Libertarians never could get traction, so the only hope we have of changing the corruption in politics is through the Tea Party. It is no accident the Republican establishment is determined to squash them. As to your desire to go to single payer, I have spent time in Europe and have many European friends. The cost to them for their “free” health care is enormous. I refer you to my writing on the subject at http://www.musingsbymarian.com/obamacare-and-the-finest-irish-whisky/

    • MariansMusings

      Deeringwater: we get bogged down (as the politicians intend for us to do) in the circular arguments of merit and blame while our elected politicians laugh at us for being so gullible. Since you are very good at research, you may have missed this: http://clashdaily.com/2013/11/rob-ford-everything-wrong-politics/
      We need fundamental change–and it is not the change Obama promised us. I hope you join my blog so we can continue the debate. You are a worthy opponent. May we both find truth in the cesspool of political discourse

    • Robert Messmer

      Not sure that someone who has a policy based on their excellent health (as well as the excellent health of all their ancestors) and the fact that they happen to be sterile would consider it to be an upgrade to a policy requiring them to pay for maternity benefits, fertility benefits, as well as paying for a bunch of strangers with AIDS, stage IV cancer, end stage Renal failure.

  • LZ

    Has anyone else noticed that there no dems had anything to say about this until it occurred to a few of them that their re-election might be at risk? I question why this bunch is all of a sudden up in arms over this law. They are not doing it for their constituents, only for the sake of getting re-elected. Why do we vote for people like this???? They all need to be herded into a pit of quicksand!!! It is long past time to en-act term limits!! And no special exemptions to the laws they pass!! I’m so disgusted with what I’ve been reading and hearing lately, I could go on and on. I guess I better shut up and go get a cup of coffee and calm down foe a few.

    • Robert Messmer

      Also after the President, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi were able to get media coverage to heap their hate on the Tea Party. Remember when there were only a few voices how they were “arsonists”, “terrorists”, and “anarchists”?

      • LZ

        Oh yeah, I remember!! I have a nephew who still doesn’t dare speak to me to this day because of what happened during a discussion and he made a comment about those idiot teabaggers, not knowing I had recently joined one of the tea party organizations.

  • Don in Ohio

    When are politicians going to figure out you can’t force people and businesses to do things they can’t afford??
    Also, it’s impossible to write a law that effects everyone that’s fair for all. The goal of all the taxes, tax credits and subsidies in the unACA is to take from those that have and give to those that don’t, socialism at it’s finest. Only problem, it isn’t working and messing with this mess is just plain dumb. Get rid of it, now.

  • Warrior

    Despicable excuses for Americans. The lights are on and the roaches have been identified!

    • Deerinwater

      For what? ~ offering you what some people want,to ‘keep what they had”.

      Well, Warrior, do you want this change in HCR or do you not want it?

      Or would you rather be left holding tight to ~ people not being able to “keep what they had” & calling the President a liar? and cock roaches.

      • Warrior

        Scrap the “socialist plan” period!

      • Warrior

        Scrap the “socialist plan” period!

      • Don in Ohio

        @Deer, we don’t the damn law at all, it’s bad for everyone!
        You simply can’t make a law that applies to everyone and expect everyone to be treated fairly and to like it.
        NEVER trust a Democrat.

      • Robert Messmer

        The problem with the proposed law to fix the “law of the land live with it” problem is the effective date. The law needs to specify that everyone who has already been cancelled, as well as those who haven’t been, will be allowed to keep, indefinitely the policy that was in effect as of 1 January 2010. In other words let them keep the policy BEFORE the ACA messed everything up; not after hundreds of thousands have been cancelled and have no policy. The rest of the proposed law is fine.

  • Robert Brennan

    This is what happens when you vote for idiots, yes that includes the Hood from Chicago.

  • John

    I have heard that Feinstein and her husband are fixing to make billions in
    U.S post Office real estate property. After that she does not need Obama!

  • hippybiker

    Somewhere in there, there must be some money in it for her.

  • Robbie

    It’s an excellent new bill – consumers must be protected from gouging from the big corporate insurance companies. It’s a shame how they operate.

    • Don in Ohio

      Robbie, at best this is a band-aid (pun intended), at worst, it will just make a bad situation worse. On one hand the insurance cos are told to cover existing conditions, on the other hand, they aren’t allowed to change coverage. I’m confused and I’m sure they are too!

      • Robbie

        Something like 35% of health care dollars spent in America go to Insurance company directors and shareholders. How does that grab you?

        • Don in Ohio

          Ok, and how much of our Medicare tax actually goes for health care. I bet at least 35% of it goes to “administration expense”.

  • Warrior

    Make it your mission people of Calif and La to get rid of these two clowns. There is NO fix for this crap. Burn the whole damn useless 20,000 pages. The FBI should be investigating the entire DNC and it’s members for this entire fraud. People need to be put in jail, period!

  • real talk 1

    While I am a staunch tea party member I will have to admit the Sen. Feinstein really surprise me with this article very unusual for a old liberal with so many years in Washington there maybe hope yet for the democratic party this just proves that not all in the Obama regime are under his spell and they can think for them selves. Thanks Sen. Feinstein

    • Don in Ohio

      @realtalk1, ah, don’t be fooled!!
      She’s just saying this because there’s an election in a year and just doing damage control for the Dems.
      NEVER trust a Democrat!

      • real talk 1

        You are so right and I will heed your advice thank you and I will pass around your message again thanks.

    • MariansMusings

      Sorry. I would like to believe the same, but I’m afraid we are looking at more smoke and mirrors. Now you see it, now you don’t. Check out my Feinstein blog at MusingsbyMarian d o t c o m.

  • Warrior

    http://news1.teapartyinfo.org/HS?a=ENX7Cqlf_5dq8SA9MKJGgVPnGHxKLFR8JfcStGb5lw8W0bBhOG5mpqVsje_HhdDcblOY

    More Fraud. Hold people accountable, no more excuses and “apologies”. You people are toast!

  • dan

    whatever became of the COBRA Act requiring 90 (?) days notice of cancellation ?

  • Bob Ewing

    While this is ‘better’, it is still government telling us that we have to buy a product.

  • Al Chemist

    Never trust a democrat. Especially when words come out of their mouth.

  • Chris

    Keep the policies as of “DECEMBER 31″? WHAT am I not understanding here? What’s to keep companies from changing people’s plans “NOW”, so if they do, HOW is that “grandfathering”?

  • chrisnj

    All of these bills to somehow enable at least some Americans to actually “keep” the healthcare plans and doctors they like are little more than “I feel your pain” political posturing.

    You can’t put the genie back in the bottle, and you can’t un-crack an egg. A Democrat president aided and abetted by Democrats in Congress have broken what was, and it won’t be put back together again. Those polices are gone gone gone …. at best Obama will offer a couple of “free” years of his own flawed policies through Medicaid.

    If the politicians REALLY were to take responsibility for their boo-boo (which was actually intentional and part of the plan to destroy private healthcare as a viable option but we all know that now, don’t we?) they would immediately and unanimously REPEAL Obamacare, remove government from the backs of consumers, providers, and insurers, and let private enterprise work its magic.

    That they don’t tells you all you need to know — they’re not really very sorry at all, they just wish you’d quietly accept that you’re peasants not Americans, and go along with their program for population control.

  • twspears6007

    I can see now Nancy Pelosi telling Chief Justice John Roberts please declare Obama Care Constitutional before he reads the law. Hey Judge Roberts how do you like supporting your Liar in Chief Barrack Obama. Judge how is your conscience doing now I hope you have trouble sleeping you deserve it. I guess you thought no one would bring it up. Look at the mess you made of this nations Health Care and betrayal to the American People. I seem to remember at your swearing in you placed your hand on the Bible to protect and uphold the Constitution not liars like Obama. I suggest you go back to law school you seem to have missed something its called honesty. I will donate money to your retirement. I have a place to recommend you retire to the Soviet Union they need people like you we don’t. Trenton Spears

  • vietnamvet1971

    IF obama care is such a good Law then why are Americans so against it?

  • Don in Ohio

    Senator Rand Paul has introduced three bill that I totally agree with, they are 1663, 1664 and 1665. They change the way the Senate works and I’m afraid they “don’t have a chance in hell of passing” as long as Reid is in charge.

    Link is here paul dot senate dot gov/?p=press_release&id=1027

  • MariansMusings

    Feinstein can pretend all she wants to. She knows the bill will never get all the way to Obama’s desk and that if it does, he will refuse to sign it just like he refused to negotiate. Chances of a veto proof vote in the Senate are slim to none. Feinstein should to go to my latest blog: Note to Feinstein-Don’t Swallow on MusingsbyMarian d o t c o m. Maybe she will then figure out how why the wheels of her wagon have run so far off the track.

  • vietnamvet1971

    Surprise, Surprise, should we be Shocked by her Feeble attempt to be acting like she is indignant at this NON- Healthcare plan from her own Boy Boss and she strutted around like a Peacock promoting it and bathing in its glory. These Sick Liberals should make every Real American Sick and Disgusted with their Evil oh I forgot they are the party of UNGODLY people BOOING GOD so they must be Hypocrites.

  • vietnamvet1971

    Surprise, Surprise, should we be Shocked by her Feeble attempt to be acting like she is indignant at this NON- Healthcare plan from her own Boy Boss and she strutted around like a Peacock promoting it and bathing in its glory. These Sick Liberals should make every Real American Sick and Disgusted with their Evil oh I forgot they are the party of UNGODLY people BOOING GOD so they must be Hypocrites.

  • Robert Messmer

    Reading this 11/14 and so far power grid here in Florida is just great. No local blackouts, brownouts, spikes or surges yesterday.

  • macgyver1948

    Obama wanted “keep your own Coverage” in ObamaCare but as it
    often is with execs there was too much delegation and trusting. A
    number of things changed with ObamaCare when it left the
    predominately GOP House committee. I often wonder if those GOP
    changes to OCare were so they would have yet another bunch of things
    to complain about concerning anything with the Obama label. That is
    what happens all too often when things are Left to the Right these
    days. More harm to come with that thought.

    How can anyone not see how the TP owned GOP is hurting us? This goes on
    all the time with them and now they have another opportunity to do as
    they are told. We need groups like AARP but for all citizens, not
    just the elderly/retired but we very much need a group to protect the
    elderly/retired to see to it they get what they have earned and
    deserve because it is clearer every day the GOP doesn’t care.

    888

    From an email I received yesterday evening:

    Dear Steve,

    On Capitol Hill today, a small group of lawmakers will get together in a
    room to make decisions about the budget – and it’s no secret that
    they’re considering cutting your benefits.

    Rep.
    Paul Ryan and Sen. Patty Murray chair the new congressional debt
    committee. They’ve been tasked with finding a way to pay the
    government’s bills, and the committee’s discussions will likely
    include cuts to your Medicare and Social Security benefits.

    These cuts would directly impact millions of Americans and make it harder
    for seniors to make ends meet. That’s why we need 100,000 activists to speak out this week and show the committee we’re counting on them to say NO to harmful cuts. They’re meeting tomorrow to start making these decisions, so they need to hear from us right now.

    With just one click, your letter will automatically be
    sent to both Rep. Ryan and Sen. Murray, the two leaders of the debt
    committee. Send your message today.

    Here’s what’s at stake. The average Social Security benefit is just about
    $15,000 a year – and for millions of seniors, that $15,000 represents nearly all they have to live on. For these families, and so many others who count on Social Security to help make ends meet, cuts to these benefits would be absolutely devastating.

    Medicare benefits are at risk too. Instead of looking to improve care and
    lower overall costs, many in Congress want to shift more healthcare
    expenses onto Medicare beneficiaries, a change that could make needed
    care and prescription drugs unaffordable.

    It just takes one click to tell the new debt committee’s leaders that
    you’re counting on them to protect the benefits you’ve earned. Click
    here to automatically send your letter right now.

    Letter to Chairman Rep. Paul Ryan, Chairwoman Sen. Patty Murray, and the
    debt committee:

    As an AARP member, I urge you and the budget conference committee to
    reject harmful cuts to Social Security and Medicare benefits.

    While it’s true that sequestration cuts should be revisited, I stand firmly
    for protecting the earned benefits that millions of Americans rely
    on, and oppose cutting Medicare and Social Security benefits to
    replace sequestration cuts.

    Congress needs to remain focused on reducing the cost of health care to lower Medicare costs and strengthening Social Security, not immediate cuts to the programs older Americans rely on most.

    The voices of Americans like you are needed to ensure the committee plan
    does not include harmful benefit cuts – click here to have your
    message automatically sent to the leaders of the debt committee.

    After you take action, don’t forget to spread the word to your friends and
    family. It’s going to take all of us speaking out to help keep Social
    Security and Medicare strong for years to come.

    Thanks for joining us in the effort to stop cuts to your benefits.

    Sincerely,

    Fred Griesbach
    AARP Campaigns