NIH Spends $500 Million Because It Wasn’t Diverse Enough


The National Institutes of Health produced a study last year proclaiming disparity between the number of black researchers who were awarded grants from the institute and the number of white and Hispanic applicants who won grants. Government responded, allocating $500 million in funding to help more black biomedical researchers get NIH grants.

The NIH said it recognized through its study that black applicants were 10 percent less likely to receive its grants than whites or Hispanics, saying “the quality of educational and mentoring experiences may differ for applicants who self-identify as black or African-American.” Furthermore, the NIH said that there were an alarmingly low number of non-white research applicants in general.

To make sure that the agency hands out more grants to minorities, NIH officials have implemented a sort of in-house affirmative action plan. They created a 10-year plan that will dedicate $50 million annually to support hundreds of minority students with scholarships, research experiences and even graduate loan repayment. The agency has also promised to make diversity a core consideration of NIH governance” and ensure fairness in the peer review system that erases “unconscious bias related to disparities in research awards.”

In 2009, the same agency commissioned a study, costing taxpayers nearly half a million dollars, to better understand why men don’t like to wear condoms during sexual intercourse.

Personal Liberty

Sam Rolley

Sam Rolley began a career in journalism working for a small town newspaper while seeking a B.A. in English. After covering community news and politics, Rolley took a position at Personal Liberty Media Group where could better hone his focus on his true passions: national politics and liberty issues. In his daily columns and reports, Rolley works to help readers understand which lies are perpetuated by the mainstream media and to stay on top of issues ignored by more conventional media outlets.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.