Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty
 

NHTSA: GM Had Critical Information That Would Have Helped Identify Defect

WASHINGTON (UPI) — The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s acting administrator will look to cast blame on General Motors when he testifies before the House subcommittee investigating GM’s vehicle recall.

David Friedman, acting administrator of the NHTSA, in written testimony submitted before the hearing, argues that serious questions have been raised about the timeliness of GM’s recall and and information in GM’s chronology of events raises serious questions.

“G.M. had critical information that would have helped identify this defect,” said Friedman.

While written testimony is never read out in its entirety, it is a matter of public record and sets the tone for the Q&A session with members of Congress.

GM Chief Executive Mary Barra will also testify Tuesday, and sounded apologetic in her written testimony but provided no answers as to why GM failed to act on the ignition problem.

“Sitting here today, I cannot tell you why it took years for a safety defect to be announced,” she says in her filed testimony.

Barra made attempts to mollify customers by saying that dealers have been informed that if customers aren’t comfortable driving the recalled cars, they could get a loaner car or a rental car from a GM dealer. She also said “if a customer is already looking for another car, dealers can provide an additional cash allowance for the purchase or lease of a new vehicle.”

Her comments come a day after GM announced another recall, involving 1.5 million cars because of a possible power steering failure. GM’s total for the year now stands at 6.3 million recalls worldwide.

UPI - United Press International, Inc.

Since 1907, United Press International (UPI) has been a leading provider of critical information to media outlets, businesses, governments and researchers worldwide.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “NHTSA: GM Had Critical Information That Would Have Helped Identify Defect”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

Bottom
close[X]

Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to PersonalLiberty.com,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.