New Documents Show That Company Tried To Protect Customers From NSA, Was Shot Down By Secret Court


A series of top-secret court documents released Friday reveal the extent to which private companies have been powerless to protect customers against government invasions of privacy via National Security Agency spying.

The documents from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court reveal that a phone company whose name was redacted in the documents challenged an NSA’s request to hand over telecommunications data in bulk. The company petitioned the court to “vacate, modify or affirm the current production order” in January after a District Judge ruled that the NSA’s phone records program was likely unConstitutional a month earlier.

“Judge [Richard] Leon’s Memorandum Opinion introduces, for the first time, a question about the legal validity of an order issued by this Court,” the company stated.

“In light of Judge Leon’s Opinion, it is appropriate [redacted] inquire directly of the Court into the legal basis” for the records request, the petition continued.

FISC Judge Rosemary Collyer issued a ruling denying the company’s request in March, deciding that the telecommunications company “provides no basis for vacating or modifying the production order.” She also defined the previous Circuit Court decision questioning the Constitutionality of the NSA’s actions “unpersuasive.”

The unknown phone company’s challenge of the bulk data collection represents the first such fight against the NSA’s data collection efforts.

Personal Liberty

Sam Rolley

Sam Rolley began a career in journalism working for a small town newspaper while seeking a B.A. in English. After covering community news and politics, Rolley took a position at Personal Liberty Media Group where could better hone his focus on his true passions: national politics and liberty issues. In his daily columns and reports, Rolley works to help readers understand which lies are perpetuated by the mainstream media and to stay on top of issues ignored by more conventional media outlets.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.