Lawmakers Try To Block The Closure Of Guantanamo


Lawmakers try to block the closure of Guantanamo The Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba may not be closed after all if the slew of legislative measures proposed in several upcoming spending bills is passed.

The facility, which has been the object of sharp criticism from libertarians as well as civil and human rights advocates, was due to be closed in the next four months, based on President Obama’s first executive order signed on January 22.

However, critics ¬- especially those in Congress – have alleged the administration has not properly explained what will happen to the freed detainees who are terrorist suspects.

"For nine months, the Obama administration has insisted the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay be shuttered within the year; but what have we seen in that time?" asked Republican Representative Harold Rogers, quoted by Agence France Presse.

"[There is no] plan. No idea of how to proceed," he added. reports that Rogers sponsored a measure in the 2010 Homeland Security Department budget to prevent the transfer of detainees from Guantanamo Bay to the U.S. It passed by a vote of 258 to 163, including 88 Democrats.

Other appropriations bills containing provisions to block the facility’s closure include the Senate defense spending bill.

Last week, the Department of Justice revealed three detainees had been transferred from the prison to Ireland and Yemen.

Media reports suggest the interagency Guantanamo Review Task Force has cleared 78 detainees, or about a third of the population of the facility, to leave.

Personal Liberty

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.