Personal Liberty Digest™ will be upgraded this weekend to reflect a dynamic new look and mobile-friendly viewing to enhance your experience! Plus, we'll be providing even more of the compelling content you've come to expect, delivered in a whole new way!

  Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty
 

Lawmakers Have Competing Ideas About Expanding Yosemite

August 7, 2014 by  

WASHINGTON (MCT) — Two veteran California lawmakers are at loggerheads over how to expand Yosemite National Park.

A House Republican and House Democrat now have competing bills folding nearly 1,600 acres in Mariposa County into the park’s boundaries. They share some ideas. They differ, though, on key questions, including whether to offset the park’s growth by the sale of Federal land elsewhere.

The explicit differences, now that they are spelled out in legislative text, could theoretically accelerate negotiations toward a final deal. Or they could yield stalemate, over mountainous land both sides agree meets Yosemite’s high standards.

“The proposed addition to the park offers spectacular views from Henness Ridge and still has remnants of timber roads that could be adapted for hiking, riding, mountain biking and other recreational pursuits,” Representative Tom McClintock (R-Calif.) said in a statement.

This month, following extended study, McClintock introduced his version of a Yosemite park expansion bill. His Congressional district includes the park and several of its surrounding gateway communities.

The land was reportedly part of naturalist John Muir’s original plan for Yosemite.

Like an earlier bill introduced 16 months ago by Representative Jim Costa (D-Calif.), McClintock’s legislation authorizes the National Park Service to expand Yosemite’s western boundary through the addition of several adjacent Mariposa County parcels.

The nonprofit Pacific Forest Trust owns about half of the 1,575 acres covered by the bill, and a consortium of medical professionals owns the other half. The trust bought its share with the long-term goal of conveying it to Yosemite. The doctors bought the land as an investment, potentially for a development. The development never transpired.

On Thursday, Pacific Forest Trust Vice President Paul Mason said in an interview that it was “progress” for McClintock to have introduced the bill, though Mason added that there are problems with specific parts of the legislation.

“I think it’s positive that he’s actually come to the table,” Mason said.

A staunch conservative who frequently denounces Federal management of public lands, McClintock included in his bill a requirement that the Yosemite expansion occur only after the Interior Department has sold, through public auction, about 1,575 acres elsewhere.

Nationwide, Interior manages more than 400 million acres, including more than 23 million acres in California. Yosemite currently has 747,956 acres.

McClintock said the provision “assures that acquisition of this new parcel will not add further to the problem” of public land management. Costa, though, called the requirement a deal-breaker.

“That’s a precedent, of exchanging land, that doesn’t make any sense to me,” Costa said in an interview. “I don’t think the administration will support it, and I’m not so sure it will pass the Senate.”

–Michael Doyle
McClatchy Washington Bureau

___

(c)2014 McClatchy Washington Bureau

Visit the McClatchy Washington Bureau at www.mcclatchydc.com.

Distributed by MCT Information Services.

McClatchy-Tribune

Operated jointly by the McClatchy Company and Tribune Company, MCT serves more than 1,200 media clients, online information services and information resellers across the globe. With 600-plus contributors worldwide, MCT has an exceptional variety of sources, providing detailed analyses, opinions and perspectives.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Lawmakers Have Competing Ideas About Expanding Yosemite”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

Bottom
close[X]

Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to PersonalLiberty.com,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.