Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty

Law would boost gays’ job security

June 25, 2009 by  

Law would boost gays' job security Lawmakers have introduced a draft law that would prohibit employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

An inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), whose lead sponsors include Massachusetts Representative Barney Frank and IIeana Ros-Lehtinen, a Florida Republican, would make it illegal to fire, refuse to hire or refuse to promote an employee based on their sexual orientation or gender identity.

"Employment should be based on who is the most qualified person for the job, and not on the personal prejudices of those who are doing the hiring," says Jody M. Huckaby, executive director of Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays.

"LGBT Americans, like their straight co-workers, go to work each day to contribute to their communities, support their families and keep our economy running," he adds.

Among the opponents of the measure are Southern Baptists, who have expressed concern the proposed law could threaten Christian organizations from hiring in accordance with their religious beliefs, according to Christian Post.

Current federal law provides legal protection against employment discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion, national origin, age and disability, but not sexual orientation or gender identity.

Windy City Times reports that in 30 states it is still legal to fire someone based on his or her sexual orientation, and in 38 states it is legal to fire someone for being transgender.

Personal Liberty News Desk

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Law would boost gays’ job security”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at

  • john

    as long as the homosexuals do not interfer with busines they should recieve equal treatment however if they cause internal problems thru their choice to act or be different they should be terminated.history proves the later choice to be thier choice

    • Chris

      John, To an extent I agree. However the term gender identity would include using the private facilities of the opposite sex with whom they may identify. This would create workplace issues and disrupt the environment. It would be easier to create one standard and comply with it than to make continuous exceptions for a behavior rather than a physical need.

      • Bruce

        Nice point Chris. The most qualified is not always the best choice. Compatibility in the work place is critical to assuring harmony leading to greater productivity. Forcing employers to hire without taking these factors into account is daft.

      • Jonathan


        Your gender identity is the identity that you assume in the drab world. That identity may be male, female, queer, or something else. We can’t tell from your name. Some native American tribes recognized seven different gender identities.

        I sincerely doubt that a person who identifies as ‘x’ would use “the private facilities of the opposite sex with whom they may identify”. They would use the appropriate facilities. Use of those facilities is a physical need, not a behavior.

    • Kevin

      Read what the New Testament says About this sickness in the World and especially Barney Frank the crook in this country’s over throw of taxes to the banks and sweet heart deals an admitted Homo!!

      In 6 months this president has been dictating his Agenda against our will we the Republic WAKE UP FOOL he bows before the Muslim kings and denounces his Christian Beliefs and puts his A”” to the west and Jerusalem and says kiss my A”

      Be forewarned fool Homo sexual’s will not see the Kingdom of God you will be with all the devils disciples!! repent or see your doom very soon as we see the morality of a hand full of ACLU Hypocrites ruin this Country!

      I Believe we should go back to the Constitution only 4 pages long less is more for the REPUBLIC and define what Democracy really is’ MOB Rule Period..but as Bush fell to the New world Order look out for The UN Foreign Troops are ready for there marching orders,, WE ALL Have Equal Rights Period.. but those who Oppose the 10 Commandments don’t!

      If This bill Passes as we have been warned more law MOB RULE AS WEE SEE BEFORE OUR EYES like why did the Dem’s go to Vietnam and the Demon socila cats want out? well that was the final calling card of Marxism and look at the USA today!


    • Kat

      I agree. Long as they don’t talk about it or attempt to have public sex, who cares ??

  • Robin from Indiana

    Current federal law provides legal protection against employment discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion, national origin, age and disability, but not sexual orientation or gender identity.

    Then leave it be! It’s not broke, so why fix it!? I certainly do not want to find myself in a company restroom with a guy in a skirt! I think it is a wrong lifestyle, and because of the many people in my family that served in the military, I have the right to that opinion. Barney Frank is disgusting as a person. How he ever got into politics is beyond me. Now he wants his gay agenda to infiltrate the corporate world. There was a time when people who were gay kept to themselves. I am sure that I have been along side a lot of them in the course of my lifetime and the various positions where I have been employed. I don’t hate gay people; I just don’t agree that they need special rights. If this proposal is passed, it is going to open up the door for all kinds of perversion. Let the law stand as it is.

    • The Captain

      Why should we force acceptance of mental illness as an “alternative lifestyle” on society? Where does it end?

    • Gregory

      This whole issue with the gay’s is a very dangerious one. To go and great special laws for them is a farce. I do not see anyone passing special laws for me or you or any of us. If you do that then yes you have caos. A gay should be able to hold a job just lilke the rest of us. But I do not believe that they have the right to be almost making out in public as many of them do.(I have seen it). And it is shocking, and I am not talking a quik kiss on the lips. I don’t know it is the kind of thing that you would not even expect from a Heterosexual.

      Barney Frank, is undermining the government as it is without the gay agenda. There
      are many people who are of the opinion(live and let live),this can be fine until you see an agenda that goes against what we stand for. Is that we want for our children? I do
      not think so. As far as I know,I think that we are the only country that accepts the gay
      community to this extent. If someone can correct that then please do.

      It is one thing to hate the person,it is quik another to hate a lifestyle. And this a lifestyle choice that I find vulgar and I can not support and I hate”IT”, and I do not believe all that is said that they have no choice. We all have a choice. We have free will. No one is twisting their arm to be with another man. Just like no one twisted my arm to get married. I could have remained single or I could have spent my life as a Playboy,but I didn’t. Or perhaps be a gay myself. There are those who have gone away from the life style and will not go back theybelieve it is wrong and now they are married with a nice happy family. The bottom line is as humans we have choices that we can make,some good some not so good. And heaven forbit you should mention the word sin. It is something we all do,but most of us admitt it.

      So admitt it and move on,you may not think that you can change,but at least you have made the first step. As it has been said you can tell by the fruit it bears and all I can see is that it is rotten.

  • Oath2Honor

    Really now!? I wonder if this new law will protect ‘Heterosexuals’ and those people who have chosen to be married ‘as a man and a woman’? Discrimination cannot be defined in such literal terms that it excludes so many other ‘groups’ of people. The state of Colorado is an ‘At Will State’ and this bill is completely irrelevant to us. The Laws already on the books should be sufficient to cover the problem. Quote, “Current federal law provides legal protection against employment discrimination on the basis of race, ””SEX””, religion, national origin, age and disability.”

  • Roberta

    Doesn’t Congress Get it? Even here in California the “People” have voted twice to not allow Gays and Lesians to marry. Is Congress and Barney Frank going to keep trying a different approach so that maybe we won’t recognize the true content of a new law? After all Congres doesn’t read legislation before they vote it into law. I don’t think the American people are naive enough to allow this to pass. We have to all write our Congressman and just say STOP this insanity. Gays and Lesians are already protected. Leave it be.

    • Bunny Tee

      Excellent point, Roberta. But the militant gays view themselves as a major political force with which to be reckoned. The self-designated “alternative and ‘tolerant’ ” now wish to be elevated to the respectability of Traditional. Like Princess Pelosi, et. al. they’re only trying to “get while the gettin’s good” Flaming liberal in Office!..go for broke!–no pun intended. These are NOT equals, these are people with a psychological disorder seeking to force acceptance of their disease as normal, natural, and nice. This alternative lifestyle is characterized by the spread of lethal blood-borne pathogens, mental and emotional instability, gross promiscuity, and a completely amoral code of conduct. Reminds one of Congress, does it not? Now we know why Congress pushes such idiotic agendas

  • Dennis Speer

    Anyone here look up the definition of Liberty?

    Main Entry: lib·er·ty
    Pronunciation: ˈli-bər-tē
    Function: noun
    Inflected Form(s): plural lib·er·ties
    Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French liberté, from Latin libertat-, libertas, from liber free — more at liberal
    Date: 14th century
    1: the quality or state of being free: a: the power to do as one pleases b: freedom from physical restraint c: freedom from arbitrary or despotic control d: the positive enjoyment of various social, political, or economic rights and privileges e: the power of choice

    If those of us subscribing to this site are truly into defending liberty we should think twice before we start talking about limiting freedom and taking away the power of choice.
    BTW- one of the liberties we in the USA enjoy is freedom of religion which extends to being free to not have a religion. What is up with fundamentalist Christians saying they are for liberty and freedom, then wanting to restrict those liberties and freedom to fit their own particular religious views?
    My wife is a Quaker and the Christians in Massachusetts tortured and killed Quakers for their beliefs. Such is the type of “religious freedom” our earliest forefathers granted. How can the conservative evangelical fundamentalist Christians of this nation push for religion based liberty limiting laws while condemning Muslim nations religion based liberty limiting laws?

  • Bunny Tee

    Hello?? any COMMON SENSE left out there?? Should the whole of a work place be disrupted due to one or more personal choices to flagrantly and flamboyantly advertise a CHOSEN behavior? Case in point: I work as a medical insurance underwriter, in my office there is a self-defined “trans-gendered” person who was born a man and has somehow decided that he should actually be female, he/she/it has decided to live openly as a woman,READ: HAS DECIDED. Now, the rest of us are forced to accept this fruit loop’s CHOICE? Every work day is now dreaded by the entirety of the office due to the daily “fashion show” that we must all mutely endure in all it’s tacky flamboyance for fear of “discriminating”. The flouncy-frilly Little BoPeep outfits with lacy ankle socks and bows in it’s hair. The outrageous and feigned simpering over hair and make-up and loud vocalizations over ill-fitting undergarments. The distraction, absurdity, contrived drama, and embarrassment is proving catastrophic on multiple levels. Would that it would save it for the weekends AT HOME and not in our work space. It just does NOT need to be, this has no place in the professional world. A law as stated above is clearly a demand upon society to “love me, love my illness” if it decides it’s Tarzan next week, then what?

  • Squeakin’ Deacon

    So, I am an individual who hires people to work for me.
    Since when does the government have the right to tell me whom to hire and whom to fire?
    It’s my business. It’s my personal investment and I have “paid my dues” to be the owner.
    How come there are people who feel they should tell me whom to hire or fire?
    Is this what freedom is about?
    I disagree.

    • Roberta

      I hate to inform you “Squeakin” but when OB hit the scence you lost all your freedoms. And you’re losing more everytime Congress votes. Rep’s need to get somebody who can stand up to these “Nut Cases”. This is not America “Land of the Free” anymore.

  • James Corbin

    Kevin, You say it best!! Go man!

  • James Corbin

    Yes, Roberta, The left is for everything that is wrong!

  • James Corbin

    Kevin, You are right it is a sickness. God didn’t create them to be gay. They are born into a world of sin. The same way little children are born with all kinds of dieases.
    But they aren’t suppose to practice the act of sin.

  • James Corbin

    Captain — I ask the same ???????

  • http://no Brian Rawls

    Does this mean that we are going to have to deal with hooter dudes along with hooter girls? lol lol lol

  • FRW

    Homosexuality is wrong, it’s a sin and it’s disgusting! Homos existed since Humanity exists on this suffering Earth, but until they stayed behind doors with their deviant lesbian, or gay behaviour, very few people cared about it.

    Now, they want influence our children in schools and in every aspects on public view. That’s bad, that’s wrong. I don’t want this evil, vicious out-of-control judaized government tells me that my child – as young as 5 years old! – has the ‘right’ and must to know about ‘alternative lifestyles’. They call 2 homos or lesbians partnership as ‘marriage’. That’s anti-God. That government has to be dismantled and overthrown by force.

  • sean murrey

    tell faggy frank i wouldnt hire any of them.


Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.