Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty

Justices Appalled By Racist Question

WASHINGTON, (UPI) — The U.S. Supreme Court Monday refused to review a Texas drug case but two justices said they were appalled by the racist language of a prosecutor.

The rejection was unanimous, but Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote an opinion on the denial that was joined by Justice Stephen Breyer.

“I hope never to see a case like this again,” Sotomayor said.

Bongani Charles Calhoun, a black man, stood trial in Texas for a drug conspiracy. At issue was whether Calhoun knew the friend he was accompanying on a road trip, along with the friend’s companions, were about to engage in a drug transaction.

When the others attempted to buy cocaine from an undercover federal agent, they were arrested.

At trial, Calhoun said he didn’t know what the others were up to, and had detached himself from the group.

“The prosecutor pressed Calhoun repeatedly to explain why he did not want to be in the hotel room [with the others],” Sotomayor wrote. “Eventually, the … judge told the prosecutor to move on. That is when the prosecutor asked, ‘You’ve got African-Americans, you’ve got Hispanics, you’ve got a bag full of money. Does that tell you — a light bulb doesn’t go off in your head and say, ‘This is a drug deal?'”

Sotomayor said Calhoun’s lawyer didn’t object at trial, and his petition to the Supreme Court cited the wrong grounds, leading the high court to reject it.

“There is no doubt, however, that the prosecutor’s question never should have been posed,” Sotomayor said. “Such argumentation is an affront to the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection of the laws. And by threatening to cultivate bias in the jury, it equally offends the defendant’s right to an impartial jury.”

She added: “By suggesting that race should play a role in establishing a defendant’s criminal intent, the prosecutor here tapped a deep and sorry vein of racial prejudice that has run through the history of criminal justice in our nation. … It is deeply disappointing to see a representative of the United States resort to this base tactic more than a decade into the 21st century. Such conduct diminishes the dignity of our criminal justice system and undermines respect for the rule of law. We expect the government to seek justice, not to fan the flames of fear and prejudice.”

UPI - United Press International, Inc.

Since 1907, United Press International (UPI) has been a leading provider of critical information to media outlets, businesses, governments and researchers worldwide.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Justices Appalled By Racist Question”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at


Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.