Justice Kagan’s Previous Healthcare Work May Hinder Impartial Decision-Making


Some are worried that Kagan's previous work could harm her impartiality.On June 30, a group of 49 Republican members of Congress asked the House Judiciary Committee to investigate Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan’s role in the preparation of a legal defense for President Barack Obama’s healthcare law.

According to The Washington Times, the group, which includes GOP Presidential candidates and Representatives Ron Paul (R-Texas) and Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), is arguing that Kagan’s time spent working with the Obama Administration should disqualify her from considering any challenges to the law.

The group of lawmakers wrote a letter to Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) and the committee’s top Democrat, John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.), urging them to consider the recently released Justice Department documents that show that Kagan “actively participated” with the Obama Administration in forming a defense for the healthcare law, according to The Times.

“This Congress and the American people deserve to have confidence in the integrity and impartiality of our Supreme Court and its justices,” the letter said.

According to The Wall Street Journal, Republicans have been wary of Kagan since her appointment, and they are watching to see if she lives up to the pledge she made to “consider every case impartially, modestly, with commitment to principle.”

Personal Liberty

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to yousoundoff@personalliberty.com by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.