Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty

Internet Censorship Via Executive Order

August 31, 2012 by  

Internet Censorship Via Executive Order
Some lawmakers want Internet censorship via Presidential executive order.

There was a fight earlier this year about Internet freedom and privacy as Congress attempted to create legislation (SOPA, PIPA, CISPA, ACTA) that would give government more control over the Internet. When Internet companies and the public expressed disdain for such a measure, legislators backed down.

Now they have a different plan.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) sent a letter earlier this week to President Barack Obama urging him to forgo Congress and pass cybersecurity legislation via his powers of executive order.

“While efforts to reach consensus continue, I fear that the Congress will be unable to pass meaningful cybersecurity legislation this year. Therefore, I believe the time has come for you to use your full authority to protect the U.S. economy and the networks we depend on from future cyber attack[s],” Feinstein contends. “While an executive order cannot convey protection from liability that private sector companies may face, your administration can issue cybersecurity standards and provide technical assistance to companies willing to take voluntary steps to improve their security.”

The Senator believes that the Nation faces grave and imminent national and economic security implications as long as the Internet is free and that there is no time to wait for Congressional legislation.

“These are meaningful, if limited, steps that can be taken now,” she said. “The threats to our national and economic security are simply too great to wait for legislation.”

Feinstein said the President should also encourage more collaboration between the Department of Homeland Security and private enterprise in the way of information sharing in order to lessen threats to national security.

A plea similar to Feinstein’s was made earlier in the month by Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), who also cosponsored Senator Joseph Lieberman’s latest attempt at legislation ceding control over the Internet to the government.

“[B]ecause it is very unclear whether the Senate will come to agreement on cybersecurity legislation in the near future, I urge you to explore and employ every lever of executive power that you possess to protect this country from the cyber threat,” Rockefeller wrote in a letter to Obama. “We must act to address our cyber vulnerabilities as soon as possible and many components of the Cybersecurity Act are amenable to implementation via executive order, normal regulatory processes, or other executive action under the authorities of the Homeland Security Act.”

Cybersecurity bills that have already been proposed have been met with harsh criticism from a number of conservative lawmakers, along with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a number of Internet-based companies. The critics say that such legislation opens the door for the Federal government to impede Internet commerce with burdensome regulation and could have a damning effect on Internet free speech.

White House chief counterterrorism adviser John Brennan has said recently that the Obama Administration is considering the possibility of Internet regulation through executive order in the wake of recent failed legislative attempts to implement the controls.

Sam Rolley

Staff writer Sam Rolley began a career in journalism working for a small town newspaper while seeking a B.A. in English. After learning about many of the biases present in most modern newsrooms, Rolley became determined to find a position in journalism that would allow him to combat the unsavory image that the news industry has gained. He is dedicated to seeking the truth and exposing the lies disseminated by the mainstream media at the behest of their corporate masters, special interest groups and information gatekeepers.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Internet Censorship Via Executive Order”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at

  • RevNowWhileWeCan

    As I’ve been saying since I’ve came to this site, we MUST do EVERYTHING in our power to protect our ability to communicate freely with each other or it’s really over. The ONLY reason so many people are “waking up” is because of our ability to tell one another what’s REALLY going on and the constant exposure of criminal/cronyism and daily injustices is almost overwhelming. Please. If you do nothing else today, share this article, as I have, on EVERY page and blog site you can. When they take away our ability to let our social network be a tool against them, then we must rely on the government and “official sources” for our information and if there is one thing we can ALL agree on, that doesn’t work so well. So please my fellow Liberty Bloggers, mount your mouses and GET THIS OUT THERE!
    Revolve Now While We Can




      • RevNowWhileWeCan

        I live in Tampa and put a lot of time into the Liberty Movement. Seeing what happened was pretty disheartening but we now know we cannot play be their rules and make the necessary changes fro the GOP platform. I really feel what happened with the GOP brass doing what they did helped us because it exposed them for what the 2 party is and opened a lot of eyes that before were not opened and wrote a lot up us Paul supporters off as a nuisance. It’s the perfect time to join the largest growing party, the Independents, because people WILL see in four years that there was NO CHANGE no matter who won and a 3rd party is a serious factor now. They now see that we are passionate Americans and the only “nuisance” we are is to the establishment. I don’t want to “revolt” against my country. I want to “revolve” back to the ideology that our forefathers intended for us. I may want to change it to “revolt” but I still feel there’s time to revolve but we’ll see if enough awaken before it’s too late.




      • http://yahoo marc lizotte

        Yes, thank you REV!

      • RevNowWhileWeCan

        Unfortunately, I don’t think there is a way in this year’s elections but we now (hopefully) have 4 years to promote a 3rd party candidate.

  • Harold Olsen

    Obama has been saying from the start that he wants to be able to shut down the Internet in the event of an emergency. I have no doubt what that would mean. Criticism of him would be seen as an emergency and he would shut us down. He’s a Hitler wannabe. Silence the opposition!

    • Flashy

      Jeesh….any of you have any idea what would occur if hackers got into the electrical grid ? Y’all think with the numerous bank security issues that companies will choose to increase security to system and foot the bill voluntarily…or will they play Russian Roulette and believe it won’t happen to them and thus be able to pay the CEO their multi-millions and the shareholders their 40 pieces of silver for greed over national security.

      How much is a safe infrastructure grid worth? If you look at banks and their security issues, you will see some have chosen to increase security, others have chosen to save costs and that paying for the theft of funds is a profitable trade-off.

      Then again, maybe you think China and other countries should be able to cripple us via a cyber attack.

      Cyber Security is saying ‘make sure your systems are safe and hackers can’t get in”.

      Jeesh…y’all continuously call yourselves “patriots”…yet don’t fully detail to whom or what you are a patriot for. ‘Cause you sure as heck aren’t a patriot for this nation.

      • Vicki

        Flashy opts for big government again blaming business as the problem by writing:
        “If you look at banks and their security issues, you will see some have chosen to increase security, others have chosen to save costs and that paying for the theft of funds is a profitable trade-off. ”

        Yet right there in your statement you have identified the non-government solution. Move your wealth to the “some” who have chosen to increase security and let the others die of lack of customers. Of course that is unless flashy’s big government bails them out. :)

      • TML

        Flashy says, “Then again, maybe you think China and other countries should be able to cripple us via a cyber attack.”

        Hogwash…. they don’t even need cyber attacks, but it’s funny to see you attempt appealing to the fear of a communist threat, with the use of communist ideals through the auspices of national security.

        “There is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions” – JFK (D)



  • Alex Frazier

    True cyber security should have absolutely nothing to do with free internet access. If the threat is to our economy through corporate espionage and similar attacks, I think improved firewalls and other non-intrusive measures of prevention would suffice. The objective should be to prevent hacking and theft, not to prevent free use of the internet. This sort of thing is just an attempt to control the dissemination of information. Stopping people from going to a website will not do anything whatsoever to address the issues of hacking, espionage, and other cyber attacks. Those are not done through normal free-access web browsing, and they won’t be stopped by restricting access to sites that are not currently restricted by their own parent companies. Nor does Google sharing my personal information with the DHS do anything at all to prevent things like that from occurring. If I’m good enough to hack something, I’m good enough to lie about my information to Google. This legislation is bogus and should be stopped at all costs. It serves no purpose but to control the people.

    But Obama fancies himself a king, so we might as well accept the fact that we’re going to bend over and take it in the rear, because no one is ready to be the one to fire the first shot and begin the long and bloody process of restoring our freedom with the force of arms … which is the only way it’s going to happen at this point. The government has already run too far amuck.

    • Flashy

      Alex…out of curiosity….where do you get that website information etc would be restricted under any proposal for cybersecurity?

      the legislation blocked by the corporate favored GOP would have done nothing of the sort…nor have I any information that Pres. Obama would attempt such via executive order.

      Is truth once again a victim of the Right’s need to whine and lie?

      • Vicki

        Flashy says:
        “Alex…out of curiosity….where do you get that website information etc would be restricted under any proposal for cybersecurity?”

      • Flashy

        Vicki…this link has nothing to do with cyber security. Thank you

      • vicki

        Or maybe it does
        “Federal Courts Order Seizure of Three Website Domains….”

      • random dudo

        might as well give up talking sense to them. they want to claim that obama wants to be a king, that the government, under his control, wants to sieze the very freedoms it could have taken away during world war II but didn’t, and all that stuff, it iwll be hard to give them proof they will not discredit. trust me, i have tried.
        hell i even explained to one guy that an executive order cannot be used to create new powers, only alter and enhance existing ones. thus an executive order would be no replacement to a proper cyber security bill. i had to close my youtube account because i was being totally harassed by him and others like him.
        if they are discrediting obama for making executive orders, they should look back at prior presidents. some of those really good presidents made a lot, far more than he has so far. but, they want to demonize him instead of using the squishy organic computer between their ears.

        though i give you kudos for having a sensible mind and try to be a voice of reason. to bad it falls on deaf ears.

    • RevNowWhileWeCan

      I agree except about the bending over part. I’ve shared this all morning and I know he’s dictator-in-chief but with enough and sustained pressure to stay away from the internet I (hope) think he will. Especially with pressure right now before November comes. Stay active brother and get it out there. Exposure is our only defense.

  • Sirian

    They are striving to achieve the same level of control over the internet as China. The Constitution be damned!! If this doesn’t illuminate the hidden agenda and intentions of our self serving, power hungry politicians, what does? Power and Control – what more is needed?

    • Wumingren

      “There’s a lot we can learn from China,” Obama said. I can’t think of anything good to learn from them.

  • Bruce

    “Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) sent a letter earlier this week to President Barack Obama urging him to forgo Congress and pass cybersecurity legislation via his powers of executive order.”
    It’s clear that this Intelligence Committee member shows an utter lack of intelligence! No wonder our country is in such a mess.

  • C Francis Habeck

    Is this what she is saying?

    “While an executive order cannot convey protection from liability that private sector companies may face,…

    Issue EOs and leave the companies exposed to possibly destructive lawsuits caused by those EOs?

    “…your administration can issue cybersecurity standards and provide technical assistance to companies willing to take voluntary steps to improve their security.”

    This sounds too much like President Carter’s “volunteer or we will fine you” strategy.

    • cawmun cents

      Its even more like we will fight for your “right” to healthcare,but then we will alternately tax you for that right as well…..hmmmm.
      That doesnt seem in keeping with the ideals that formed this nation.
      But what do I know?
      Apparently very little……

  • cawmun cents

    The question is…..who do you want controlling your ability to voice your opinion?
    Those who supposedly want to save you,or those who want to let you have your Constitutional rights?
    If you think that gubment has the ability to save you,considering they cant seem to get much of ANYTHING done recently,I have some mountaintop property in southern Florida I’d like to sell you.

  • The Matrix

    The Internet exposes the politico criminals for the whole world to see the emperior has no clothes. Why wouldn’t they want control of it? Thank God for sites like Bob Livingston’s Personal Liberty Alerts. The last baston of freedom for humanity.

  • NoCensorship

    These idiots that want to continually side step the Constitution have to be removed from office. As far as censoring the use of the internet by the government again I do not need nor want them to protect me. Like the useless trash on TV which I got sick of (threw out all televisions 4 yrs ago) I will do the same thing with the internet if the government decides to censor it – I will disconnect it
    Odimwit and the liberals are pushing for a civil war

  • Elton Robb

    Big Government types will win, but think of the freedom we’ll have once Jesus Christ does what he promised to do. There is a class of people in our society which are on a power trip. They believe they have the divine right to rule over us and even have a myth supporting this delusion. This class of people have been, for over several generations, taught that they are the ones who rule over the others. And while the lines of Zarah and Pharez produced ideal monarchs — with the real example being the Man we call Jesus Christ, they also have produced evil and psychopathic men who lust and greed for power, who are puffed up in pride, and are envious of Jesus Christ being the one who has real authority to rule from the Great Eternal himself.

    It is wrong, but they do wrong things to show how sick and perverted they really are.

    • http://none Charlie

      Elton, good point , but , King Jesus will do what He said , that’s not in question, but, what is
      in question IS , do you know what King Jesus said in His Book , for You to do ???
      BECAUSE , King Jesus is waiting on His People to do their part , His part is already done..
      Do you know when Obadiah is going to happen ? and are you ready to lead under His Command if it happens today?…
      Most so called Christian are NOT Christian PER The Book,,, can you answer the question
      “How does one become a Christian PER The Book”??? IF, not , then you may not be what you think you are. Hosea 4:6 says “My people perish for lack of knowledge”. So,
      Praise King Jesus for Salvation and Healing … Acts 2:38 is salvation…
      Communications can NEVER be cut off from His People to Him by a goofy state god!!!


    I love my country but fear my government.
    God bless America.

    • http://none Charlie

      GRAMPA, if you fear so called government then they are your God /god… My God IS
      King Jesus Christ , see His first two Commands at Matthew 6:33…then,,,
      Praise King Jesus for Salvation and Healing … Acts 2:38 is salvation…

  • r.p.

    Oh yessssssss!!!

    They are working under the radar with exagerated claims to protect us from “cyber attacks. According to our illustrious senator from Colorado, Mark Udall stated on August 20, 2012—” I have introduced three amendments to S.3414 that will make this bill even stronger. The first would require the administration to provide a detailed plan on how it will develop a highly trained federal cybersecurity workforce. The second would establish permanent faculty positions to train the next generation of military cyber leaders at the U.S. Air Force Academy. Finally, my third amendment addresses the strategic stockpile of extra high-voltage transformers, which are vital to our nation’s power grid and would take months or years to replace if destroyed by a cyber attack.”—- What The FFFFFF!!!!! Since when did an EMP attack have anything to do with access to the internet? Although I believe his third ammendment has some merit, it doesn’t even belong in this bill of “Deception”. Yeppirs….More government growth, more unconstitutional restrictions, more spending, Mr. Udall needs to be sent home along with his cohorts Mr. Bennet, Ms. Feinstein, and Mr. Obama.

    • http://none Charlie

      rp, fear no state god , because King Jesus controls the electronics from the Sun, and it can play hell with any other electronics …

  • John John

    That idiot in charge as president can never supress my comments. That niguer and his niguer friends like feinstein, boxer, clinton, reid, pelosi an others are just (_0_)’s in my and other eyes. They will rue the day when the judgement of God reins down on them for the atrocities they have committed on Americans. America will rise. Like they say in the South “Hell no I aint forgot,: The civil war is just at half time. It aint over. Hear that you dumb ass niguer.

    • http://none Charlie

      John John, Your Confederate tone is coming thru , but , bear in Mind King Jesus said to be kind , even to dumb animals … Tell all We love Dixie and keep the Stars and Bars flying
      Praise King Jesus for Salvation and Healing … Acts 2:38… is salvation…

  • Wayne Leach

    Who does obama think he is, the King from Kenya??

    • http://none Charlie

      Might be,,BUT,, he’s no problem for King Jesus to easily toss to hell… Remember the battle cry “no king but King Jesus”?.. then,,,
      Praise King Jesus for Salvation and Healing… Acts 2:38 is salvation…

  • Old504Troop

    16 November 2009
    In a town hall style meeting on Sunday in Beijing, President Obama expressed his opinion regarding Chinese restrictions on internet access. The Associated Press reports:
    It was a delicately balanced message and Obama couched his admonitions with words calling for cooperation, heavy with praise and American humility.
    “I think that the more freely information flows, the stronger the society becomes, because then citizens of countries around the world can hold their own governments accountable,” Obama told students during his first-ever trip to China. “They can begin to think for themselves.”
    Jan 28, 2011
    President Obama expressed disapproval on Thursday of Egypt’s crackdown on the Internet as police battled protestors in the streets of Cairo and other Egyptian cities.
    During an interview with Steve Grove, the head of news and politics at YouTube, President Obama cited a need for mechanisms that “allow [people] to express legitimate grievances.”
    June 4, 2011
    “We are deeply concerned by reports that Internet service has been shut down across much of Syria, as have some mobile communication networks,” Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Saturday. “We condemn any effort to suppress the Syrian people’s exercise of their rights to free expression, assembly, and association.” “States should not arbitrarily deprive or disrupt individuals’ access to the Internet or other networked technologies,” Clinton said, citing the cyber plan.

    If this administration is so concerned with other country’s rights and freedoms, why do they feel they need to bypass our Congress with an Executive Order?

  • AJ

    Well now! We all know the only cyber threats to our national and economic security are the fact that the internet exposes all their bull sh_t that they try and pull. The government, our government. People you still really belive we live in a democracy? Just look at the Republican National convention. It can be likened to a house hold in America. Johnny and Susie wake up one morning and mommy says I want you kids to know that you live in a democracy here in this house. Today you’re going to choose what to wear. Mommy goes over to the closet and gets a green and blue outfit for Johnny and lays it on his bed. Mommy then goes and gets a red and blue dress out of the closet and puts them on Susies bed. She then says children this is a democracy choose what you want to wear. Johnny says but mommy, I want to wear the brown outfit still in the closet. Susie says but mommy I want to wear the pink dress still in the closet. Mommy says children I’ve told you choose this is a democracy. The outfits and dresses in the closet are not an option. Mommy knows whats best for you. So choose you live in a democracy. My fellow Americans we are in Orson Wells 1984. Wake up and smell the communistic big sisses and bros in democracy sheeps clothing. There is a stentch of Facism weaving through it all.

    • Vigilant

      Try “H.G. Wells,” not Orson Welles.

      • AJ

        Thank You

  • Mark Biolchino

    Diane Feinstein, like Obama are clear examples that anyone no matter how qualified, or not can rise to the top in the federal government. Is our country great or what that we can hire the handicapped for our highest offices in the land. God bless America

  • don

    its a hell of a deal how a reprsentitive of f some poeople of califonia can decide what we have for imformation. have the dictator wanna be make it an order we give up more of our rights. these people are supposed to be representitives of the people. they call them leaders. it was originally supposed to be our representitives were in washington following the peoples bidings. now they are leaders creating new rules for everyone. its time for change. we need a revolution which would shake things up in this country and make it the way it should be.get rid of the “ruling” democrats feinstien and pelosi” etc.” its amazing how powerful they have become. after what we have had done with obunhole who would want 4 more years of his mess. no more democrat presisents.

  • Bad Bob

    Executive Orders is one thing but abusing the separation of power to dictate is treason. If I hadn’t witnessed these last three and a half years of obama’s arrogant contempt for the limit of his power, bypassing Congress in the genocide deaths of 130,000 Libyans, not enforcing federal laws passed by Congress, and supported by the majority. Taking control of the private sector of our economy, one Constitutional violation after another while 535 Congressional enablers turn a blind eye to his treason, and a Supreme Court that give him the green light to continue his arrogant ignorance.

    I live in Arizona and have seen first hand his treason. Not only did he not protect the state from invasion but sided with Mexico in their law suit on SB1070. He filed suit against our sheriff’s for enforcing laws he refused to enforce. Hell this poor excuse for a human being has even armed our invaders.

    30,000 drones watch us from above in the name of terror. One question, If terrorist were trying to kill us would we have a wide open Southern border? 40 miles South on interstate 8 from the largest nuclear plant in the US we have land occupied by these invaders. 90% of our law enforcement shot are shot by these invaders, they are responsible for all these home invasions. After what that SOB put this state through and the massive voters fraud I saw in 2010 there is nothing this criminal will not do, including mass murder.

    If there is anyone that will still cast a vote for this vermin then that person shouldn’t be voting. So unless the requirement to vote is changed from age to IQ the voting booth is the last place to go to bring this nation back to Constitutional Rule. What it is going to take is real Americans doing what is not only their right to do but their duty to do while we still have the means to do so. The biggest traitors among us hold political office.

    • http://none Charlie

      Bad Bob,,,the Maricopa county Sheriff is not a true Christian PER The Book, I called him just to find that out ,,,but,,,he is one of the best Sheriffs in USA , but, with little or no
      Prayer Power and your ball less governor , he’s in a tough spot, with mostly heathens to vote him back in each term …
      When America is brought back into The Basic Bible and / or The Constitution, it will be under The Leadership of King Jesus Christ , OR it won’t be… So,
      Praise King Jesus for Salvation and Healing… Acts 2:38 is salvation…

  • RevNowWhileWeCan
  • charles

    My response to this article is keep on usurping our constitution and you are going to bring down the Wrath of the people all around you, and remember this we know who you are and we will not forget. This country still has a constitution and we th people your bosses are getting Dam tired of you the polititions makeing end runs around it.

  • chuckb

    bad bob, we have a number of people mad because their candidate didn’t win, well mine didn’t win either and i don’t care if romney won’t produce his tax returns, so what, we have a guy in the white house that is hell bent on controlling this country by dictate and he hasn’t revealed anything about his past. we need to rid this vermin of his perch and everyone should vote to remove him, then they can start their new party. how ridiculous!

  • TML

    Executive Orders are a flaw in the Constitution, discovered by a sectional party just prior to the ‘Civil’ War, and should be forbidden through an Amendment to the Constitution. Under no circumstances should a President have the power to bypass congress [The People].

    • http://none Charlie

      TML,,,find the document that brought the states back under The Constitution AFTER the war between the states ,,,I will pay a 100 bucks for a copy … The events tell one that IF they know anything about “””Martial Law Rule””” ,,,Lincoln ,shoot , Johnson lamed ducked
      out ,,General Grant , still under Martial law took over under color of law ,remember the Confederate states were still under heavy Martial law rule ,that’s why the KKK came into vigilantism but mostly against outlaw negroism …The Confederate Flag , even today is the most Christian designed flag in America… So these executive orders are under Martial Law Rule …THEY DO NOT OVERRIDE THE BIBLE LAW!!! So ,,,
      Praise King Jesus for Salvation and Healing… Acts 2:38 is salvation…

      • TML

        You’re argument is relatively unintelligible.

      • http://none Charlie

        what argument ? it’s historical facts My uncle was there…………




      • TML

        Charlie…. umm, where exactly was your uncle? *scratches head*

        While I don’t necessarily disagree with your claim that “these executive orders are under a type of martial law, or could be viewed as such. What I meant was, this…

        Charlie says, “The Confederate Flag , even today is the most Christian designed flag in America… So these executive orders are under Martial Law Rule”

        … makes no sense. What does the cross of St. Andrews have to so with Executive Orders being under martial law? And…

        Charlie says, “THEY [Executive Orders] DO NOT OVERRIDE THE BIBLE LAW!!! ”

        …what does biblical law have to do with anything on the subject?

      • http://none Charlie

        Horton, TML,,, it’s very difficult to communicate Truth to some one who is “Mind programmed” to THINK they have the truth,,,but,,,have NOT verified what they think is
        truth to indeed be factual, actual , historical truth … Both of you guys , from My experience
        and view point , are “”Functional Psychotics””,,,I know because I WAS one for about 30
        ON some subject matters you are “Experts”,,,but,,,on some other subject matters you are
        “”Brainwashed””, which is also known as “Mind programming with what one “Thinks” is truth… Education levels matter very little , a PhD can be just as “Brainwashed” as a cowboy that can barley saddle a horse , ON some subject matters, in My local I have proven that close to 99% of white males are brainwashed regarding the Book called The
        Holy Bible…
        The above relates to any state of America , The Bible is a History book and it’s The only
        history book I have Not been able to prove wrong yet … Most American history books are
        full of lies that can be proven to be lies IF one does some serious searching … Eye witness is a very good source of truth , that’s why I refer to My Uncles , there were eye
        witnesses to some American history …For example most people don’t know which side
        was right in the so called “Civil War”,,, do you? , well your may be right ,,,but,, the facts
        are , both sides were WRONG , according to The Bible Law,,,but can you tell a brainwashed hot head , he is wrong??? Anyway continue the search for “Truth” and,,,
        Praise King Jesus for Salvation and Healing … Acts 2:38 is salvation…

  • Herbe

    Senator Feinstein personally fears increasingly adverse political scrutiny as long as the Internet is free and the First Amendment governs the right to petition government and urges the Imana Obama to intercede and prohibit First Amendment protections for political speech because there is no time to wait for Congressional legislation, she may be voted out of office if he delays.

  • chuckb

    herba, in california jesus christ would be voted out of office before feinstein. please you are referring to royalty here.

  • tom

    Why all of a sudden is our country in this shape ? Oh yeah , for one , we’ve taken GOD out of our nation , when we should have taken the evil out . Two , we have an illegal pres.

  • Pingback: Prison » White House circulating draft of executive order on cybersecurity « CITIZEN.BLOGGER.1984+ GUNNY.G BLOG.EMAIL

  • Pingback: Liberty, Never Forget : Personal Liberty Digest™


Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.