Individual Mandate At Heart Of Court Debate Over Obamacare


Judges skeptical over Obama administration's healthcare arguments.The Barack Obama Administration’s Acting Solicitor General was recently in court to defend the healthcare overhaul law and was reportedly met with skepticism by the judges.

The three-judge panel for the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals listened to arguments from Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal, who was appealing an earlier decision that ruled that the law was unConstitutional.

The main question at the heart of the debate was whether the mandate that everyone in the United States purchase health insurance is permissible by the Constitution.

“If we uphold the individual mandate in this case, are there any limits on Congress’s power left?” Judge Joel Dubina said, reports Fox News.

The Los Angeles Times reports that many legal commentators had initially dismissed concerns regarding the individual mandate but that Federal courts have struggled to come to a consensus on the provision of the law.

“(The government has) a lot of authority to regulate health insurers and a lot of authority to regulate people who voluntarily purchase health insurance,” the plaintiffs’ representative Paul Clement said. “But I would submit they don’t have the authority to compel people to engage in the transaction.”

The lawsuit against the healthcare overhaul has been filed by 26 States.

Personal Liberty

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.