In Some States, Lower Crime Costs Taxpayers Money

0 Shares
prison0521_image

Contracts between local governments and for-profit private prison complexes often include provisions for “lockup quotas” and “low crime taxes,” according to a new report from In The Public Interest (ITPI).

The report indicates that 62 percent of the private prison contracts the group studied require States to keep 80 percent to 100 percent of prison beds occupied. If the number of beds occupied falls below the quota, taxpayers pay the difference.

In 2012, Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) offered to buy and operate a number of States’ prison in exchange for a 20-year contract, which would include a 90 percent occupancy rate guarantee for the entire term. No States took CCA up on its offer, but there are already a number of private prisons throughout the Nation with lockup quotas.

The reports states: “These contract clauses incentivize keeping prison beds filled, which runs counter to many states’ public policy goals of reducing the prison population and increasing efforts for inmate rehabilitation. When policymakers received the 2012 CCA letter, some worried the terms of CCA’s offer would encourage criminal justice officials to seek harsher sentences to maintain the occupancy rates required by a contract. Policy decisions should be based on creating and maintaining a just criminal justice system that protects the public interest, not ensuring corporate profits.”

The Lake Erie Correctional Institution in Ohio, a CCA prison, has a 90 percent lockup quota that ITPI contends led to “cutting corners on safety, including overcrowding, areas without secure doors, and an increase in crime both inside the prison and the surrounding community.”

And when Colorado prisons failed to meet lockup quotas due to dropping crime rates, the State was forced to pay CCA $2 million in taxpayer money.

“By contractually requiring states to guarantee payment for a large percentage of prison beds, the prison companies are able to protect themselves against fluctuations in the prison population. These provisions guarantee prison companies a consistent and regular revenue stream, insulating them from ordinary business risks,” the report says. “The financial risks are borne by the public, while the private corporations are guaranteed profits from taxpayer dollars.”

View the full report here.

Personal Liberty

Sam Rolley

Sam Rolley began a career in journalism working for a small town newspaper while seeking a B.A. in English. After covering community news and politics, Rolley took a position at Personal Liberty Media Group where could better hone his focus on his true passions: national politics and liberty issues. In his daily columns and reports, Rolley works to help readers understand which lies are perpetuated by the mainstream media and to stay on top of issues ignored by more conventional media outlets.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

  • Chester

    Private prisons are the least safe place for inmates to be. If no problems between inmates that staff overlook, then problems between staff and inmates that usually end with inmate hospitalized, or in solitary confinement. Might look at the issues Missouri had with some of the private prisons in Texas back in the 90s.

  • dan

    Prison Industrial Complex…Milatary Industrial Complex….
    not much difference if you’re caught up in the belly of the beast
    …the tail starts to wag the dog