Personal Liberty Digest™ will be upgraded this weekend to reflect a dynamic new look and mobile-friendly viewing to enhance your experience! Plus, we'll be providing even more of the compelling content you've come to expect, delivered in a whole new way!

  Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty
 

House Passes Bill To Further Restrict Federal Dollars For Abortions

WASHINGTON (UPI) — The Republican-led U.S. House approved a bill that would impose tighter restrictions on Federal payments for abortions and sent it to the Democratic-led Senate.

The 227-188 vote Tuesday was mainly along party lines, with six Democrats voting yes, one Republican voting no and another voting present, The New York Times reported.

“Here we go again,” Representative Barbara Lee (D-Calif.) said. “It’s another battle in the war on women.”

Republicans, dogged by accusations that they are hostile to women, said Democrats unfairly characterized their intentions.

“I will say it again,” Representative Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) said. “We are not attacking women’s healthcare.”

Existing law such as the Hyde Amendment restricts Federal financing for abortion services. Since the Hyde Amendment must be renewed annually, Republicans said their proposal merely would codify what has been the law of the land.

Some Republicans said they would prefer discussing jobs and the economy rather than an abortion bill, which will go nowhere in the Democratic-majority Senate, The Times said.

“I’ve always said that we ought to avoid taking on these hot-button social issues; they don’t do us any good,” Representative Charlie Dent (R-Pa.) said.

While he voted for the bill, Dent also noted how some of his colleagues were so ill-prepared to discuss women’s health issues that the leadership has had to counsel its members on how to approach the topic with greater sensitivity.

“Here’s my suggestion for a communications strategy for some of these guys,” Dent said. “Four words: Shut the bleep up.”

Some Democrats, too, said they think their party would be better served discussing jobs and the economy, The Times said.

“I’m a skeptic,” said Representative Peter Welch (D-Vt.). “The people we represent need jobs, need better incomes and want us to focus on the economy. To the extent that we get involved in issues that take us away from that, it legitimately undercuts our credibility.”

UPI - United Press International, Inc.

Since 1907, United Press International (UPI) has been a leading provider of critical information to media outlets, businesses, governments and researchers worldwide.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “House Passes Bill To Further Restrict Federal Dollars For Abortions”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

Bottom
close[X]

Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to PersonalLiberty.com,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.