Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty
 

House Bill Would Slash Foreign Aid

July 19, 2013 by  

House Bill Would Slash Foreign Aid
PHOTOS.COM

House Republicans, on Thursday, introduced a spending proposal that would cut U.S. foreign aid expenditures by 26 percent and deny funding to implement the controversial United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.

Starting in October, the bill would allot $17.3 billion for foreign aid, $5.8 billion less than the previous spending bill allowed. The cuts would also affect the State Department, slashing the diplomatic agency’s operating budget by $2.4 billion to $14.6 billion.

House lawmakers say the spending cuts are aimed at eliminating lower-priority diplomatic programs and expenditures that the Federal government simply can’t afford at this time.

“Given all of the country’s needs and fiscal realities, we must prioritize our very limited funds on only the most important international activities,” said the House Appropriations Committee chairman, Representative Hal Rogers (R-Ky.).

The bill prioritizes funding on overseas security efforts, and it would set aside $6.5 billion for war-related costs of operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. It would also provide full funding for embassy security in the wake of attacks on U.S. diplomatic posts last year, assistance to key foreign allies, programs to promote democracy abroad and help for refugees and other humanitarian efforts.

“We live in a time of uncertainty and instability around the globe, and it is vital to our national security and well-being that the United States maintains an active role in global affairs. However, given all of the country’s needs and fiscal realities, we must prioritize our very limited funds on only the most important international activities. This bill makes these hard choices, maintaining critical missions, diplomatic efforts, and the safety and security of Americans abroad, while cutting lower-priority programs or those that we simply cannot afford at this time,” Rogers said.

The bill also puts tough conditions in place for foreign assistance for Afghanistan, Egypt, Pakistan and the Palestinians. For example, echoing calls from lawmakers like Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.), the bill would withhold economic and security assistance if the Egypt government fails to adhere to the peace treaty with Israel or does not meet other conditions in support of Egypt’s democratic transition.

While the bill is full of provisions popular with American conservatives, it’s unlikely that it will ever become law because of objections from State Department and other top Administration officials.

“We are very concerned,” State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said during a press conference. “These proposed cuts, which would be devastating if put into effect, would hurt our ability to stand up for American interests and values around the world. The U.S. can’t lead if we retreat in this way.”

Sam Rolley

Staff writer Sam Rolley began a career in journalism working for a small town newspaper while seeking a B.A. in English. After learning about many of the biases present in most modern newsrooms, Rolley became determined to find a position in journalism that would allow him to combat the unsavory image that the news industry has gained. He is dedicated to seeking the truth and exposing the lies disseminated by the mainstream media at the behest of their corporate masters, special interest groups and information gatekeepers.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “House Bill Would Slash Foreign Aid”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • http://none Ken

    Any country or movement that is suspect of jihad against us should not only be left unsupported, rather opposed and banned from diplomacy of any sort. The Muslim Brotherhood is just such an organization. “The Project” found and implemented in Switzerland in 1982 explains their “points of departure” into western society as blatant support for every form of jihad (holy war) imagineable.
    All attempts of theirs to gain support should be “non-negotiable.
    What more needs to be said ?

  • http://shadow1776.wordpress.com shadow1776

    We need to focus on the here and now. To hell with the other countries, at least until we are on our feet again.

Bottom
close[X]

Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to PersonalLiberty.com,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.