Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty

Homeopathy: The Forbidden Medicine

June 7, 2011 by  

I have learned over the years to inquire about whatever establishment medicine opposes.

Since we have a drug culture created by the pharmaceutical trust, we can be certain that any nondrug therapy will be vigorously opposed by the Food and Drug Administration and the police power behind it. I personally know of, and have used, a skin cancer cream very successfully, distributed by an individual who happened to have an herb formula that is perfect.

Well, the FDA health police showed up at her door, asked for her stock and ordered her to cease and desist her distribution of the product. Luckily, I had bought a few containers ahead of time, which I gave to people who needed it.

Maybe the most suppressed alternative medicine is homeopathy. One hundred years ago, homeopathy was at least half the medical therapy in the U.S. But it is nondrug, so it has been systematically suppressed. There is in the U.S. almost a complete ignorance of homeopathy.

Really it’s too simple to believe it can work.

Some of you may know the potency (potentization) of homeopathy preparations are inverse. This means that the more solutions are diluted, the more potency of healing they have. I have a difficult time understanding this myself.

Homeopathic practice is based on a single law of therapeutics called the Law of Similars. This law states that a substance that can cause the symptoms of a disease can also cure it. In fact, that is exactly what the word homeopathy means, similar (homeo) suffering (pathy).

There are many homeopathic principles used in allopathy, but conventional doctors are oblivious to it. The process of preparing homeopathic therapies is puzzling to most medical people simply because they perceive the ultra-dilutions as nonsubstantive and really nonsense. They believe the ultra-dilutions are so dilute that they cannot possibly contain a single molecule of the original substance — but they are still potent therapeutically, in fact very potent.

This says two things:

  • There is no drug.
  • These preparations are safe.

I have never read where anyone was harmed with homeopathic medicine.

I have one big thing going for me. I don’t let science or proof get in my way. If something works, nothing else matters to me. I don’t have to understand it or even believe it. I am not a good patient for conventional medicine.

The primary and fundamental philosophy of conventional allopathy medicine is harmful. It simply is a drug system of suppressing symptoms. What makes this system work is that it gives temporary relief by suppressing symptoms. So these suppressive drugs must be taken again and again. Repeat business builds the drug culture.

Now, do you suppose the people in the inner sanctums of the drug cartel know how their drugs create repeat business over and over?

Bob Livingston

is an ultra-conservative American and author of The Bob Livingston Letter™, founded in 1969. Bob has devoted much of his life to research and the quest for truth on a variety of subjects. Bob specializes in health issues such as nutritional supplements and alternatives to drugs, as well as issues of privacy (both personal and financial), asset protection and the preservation of freedom.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Homeopathy: The Forbidden Medicine”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at

  • granny mae

    My experience with conventional medicine in 69 years has all benn dissapointing. I have not been cured of anything by it that wouldn’t take care of itself in time. I take that back, about 7 years ago I had double pneumonia and congestive heart failure, I was in intensive care for 6 days and they didn’t think I was going to make it so they sent me to a nursing home. Thank God they did. The loving care I got there helped give me the encouragement to keep on fighting. After three weeks in the nursing home my husband said that is enough, I’m taking her home and if she dies she will die at home surrounded by her family. I didn’t die but I got better. I do believe that the antibiotics they gave me stopped the pneumonia but the water pills took so much fluid out of me that my hands began to feel like leather baseball mits ! I was so weak but when I got home it seemed to encourage me to get up and try to move around. I had everything I needed here at home so it was easier. My husband started juicing for me and making sure that I took certain vitamins and minerals etc. and I’m here today thanks to him. I believe in healing with herbs and vitamins and many of the unconventional methods. Modern meds. sometimes are not all they are cracked up to be. I believe that doctors should be open to all methods of healing not just the pharmaseutical way.

  • http://PersonalLibertyDigest David Griffith

    Alternative medicine
    Think yourself better
    Alternative medical treatments rarely work. But the placebo effect they induce sometimes does
    May 19th 2011 | from the print edition

    ON MAY 29th Edzard Ernst, the world’s first professor of complementary medicine, will step down after 18 years in his post at the Peninsula Medical School, in south-west England. Despite his job title (and the initial hopes of some purveyors of non-mainstream treatments), Dr Ernst is no breathless promoter of snake oil. Instead, he and his research group have pioneered the rigorous study of everything from acupuncture and crystal healing to Reiki channelling and herbal remedies.

    Alternative medicine is big business. Since it is largely unregulated, reliable statistics are hard to come by. The market in Britain alone, however, is believed to be worth around £210m ($340m), with one in five adults thought to be consumers, and some treatments (particularly homeopathy) available from the National Health Service. Around the world, according to an estimate made in 2008, the industry’s value is about $60 billion.

    Over the years Dr Ernst and his group have run clinical trials and published over 160 meta-analyses of other studies. (Meta-analysis is a statistical technique for extracting information from lots of small trials that are not, by themselves, statistically reliable.) His findings are stark. According to his “Guide to Complementary and Alternative Medicine”, around 95% of the treatments he and his colleagues examined—in fields as diverse as acupuncture, herbal medicine, homeopathy and reflexology—are statistically indistinguishable from placebo treatments. In only 5% of cases was there either a clear benefit above and beyond a placebo (there is, for instance, evidence suggesting that St John’s Wort, a herbal remedy, can help with mild depression), or even just a hint that something interesting was happening to suggest that further research might be warranted.

    Related topics
    Alternative medicine
    Health and fitness
    It was, at times, a lonely experience. Money was hard to come by. Practitioners of alternative medicine became increasingly reluctant to co-operate as the negative results piled up (a row in 2005 with an alternative-medicine lobby group founded by Prince Charles did not help), while traditional medical-research bodies saw investigations into things like Ayurvedic healing as a waste of time.

    Yet Dr Ernst believes his work helps address a serious public-health problem. He points out that conventional medicines must be shown to be both safe and efficacious before they can be licensed for sale. That is rarely true of alternative treatments, which rely on a mixture of appeals to tradition and to the “natural” wholesomeness of their products to reassure consumers. That explains why, for instance, some homeopaths can market treatments for malaria, despite a lack of evidence to suggest that such treatments work, or why some chiropractors can claim to cure infertility.

    Despite this lack of evidence, and despite the possibility that some alternative practitioners may be harming their patients (either directly, or by convincing them to forgo more conventional treatments for their ailments), Dr Ernst also believes there is something that conventional doctors can usefully learn from the chiropractors, homeopaths and Ascended Masters. This is the therapeutic value of the placebo effect, one of the strangest and slipperiest phenomena in medicine.

    Mind and body

    A placebo is a sham medical treatment—a pharmacologically inert sugar pill, perhaps, or a piece of pretend surgery. Its main scientific use at the moment is in clinical trials as a baseline for comparison with another treatment. But just because the medicine is not real does not mean it doesn’t work. That is precisely the point of using it in trials: researchers have known for years that comparing treatment against no treatment at all will give a misleading result.

    Giving pretend painkillers, for instance, can reduce the amount of pain a patient experiences. A study carried out in 2002 suggested that fake surgery for arthritis in the knee provides similar benefits to the real thing. And the effects can be harmful as well as helpful. Patients taking fake opiates after having been prescribed the real thing may experience the shallow breathing that is a side-effect of the real drugs.

    Besides being benchmarks, placebos are a topic of research in their own right. On May 16th the Royal Society, the world’s oldest scientific academy, published a volume of itsPhilosophical Transactions devoted to the field.

    One conclusion emerging from the research, says Irving Kirsch, a professor at Harvard Medical School who wrote the preface to the volume, is that the effect is strongest for those disorders that are predominantly mental and subjective, a conclusion backed by a meta-analysis of placebo studies that was carried out in 2010 by researchers at the Cochrane Collaboration, an organisation that reviews evidence for medical treatments. In the case of depression, says Dr Kirsch, giving patients placebo pills can produce very nearly the same effect as dosing them with the latest antidepressant medicines.

    Pain is another nerve-related symptom susceptible to treatment by placebo. Here, patients’ expectations influence the potency of the effect. Telling someone that you are giving him morphine provides more pain relief than saying you are dosing him with aspirin—even when both pills actually contain nothing more than sugar. Neuro-imaging shows that this deception stimulates the production of naturally occurring painkilling chemicals in the brain. A paper in Philosophical Transactions by Karin Meissner of Ludwig-Maximilians University in Munich concludes that placebo treatments are also able to affect the autonomic nervous system, which controls unconscious functions such as heartbeat, blood pressure, digestion and the like. Drama is important, too. Placebo injections are more effective than placebo pills, and neither is as potent as sham surgery. And the more positive a doctor is when telling a patient about the placebo he is prescribing, the more likely it is to do that patient good.

    Despite the power of placebos, many conventional doctors are leery of prescribing them. They worry that to do so is to deceive their patients. Yet perhaps the most fascinating results in placebo research—most recently examined by Ted Kaptchuk and his colleagues at Harvard Medical School, in the context of irritable-bowel syndrome—is that the effect may persist even if patients are told that they are getting placebo treatments.

    Unlike their conventional counterparts, practitioners of alternative medicine often excel at harnessing the placebo effect, says Dr Ernst. They offer long, relaxed consultations with their customers (exactly the sort of “good bedside manner” that harried modern doctors struggle to provide). And they believe passionately in their treatments, which are often delivered with great and reassuring ceremony. That alone can be enough to do good, even though the magnets, crystals and ultra-dilute solutions applied to the patients are, by themselves, completely useless.

    from the print edition | Science and Technology

    David Griffith

  • granny mae


    It seems to me that you are comparing Placebo with junk treatment. Not with true herbal treatment. Does it matter what the treatment is if for that patient it works? Sure is a lot better than the known side effects of all chemical medicine today. If a sugar pill works then take the sugar pill, it won’t end up stopping your kidneys from working or cause you to go blind or have thoughts of suicide, or liver disfunction. Have you listened to the side effects of all the modern medicine advertised on the TV today and none of them cure the problem they simply treat the symptom till another symptom comes along ! Ha ! Give me the placebo ! Science isn’t looking for cures to anything just ways to manage the situation till the patient eventually dies ! Is it any wonder the insurance costs today are so high ?


Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.