Personal Liberty Digest™ will be upgraded this weekend to reflect a dynamic new look and mobile-friendly viewing to enhance your experience! Plus, we'll be providing even more of the compelling content you've come to expect, delivered in a whole new way!

  Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty

Hiring Blunders Are Expensive, Managers Say

CHICAGO (UPI) — Hiring blunders can be costly, especially so in Britain, a global survey of hiring managers and human resources personnel found.

There were several costs associated with hiring the wrong person, a Harris Interactive survey sponsored by CareerBuilder found. Potential revenue was lost, relationships with clients or other staff may have suffered or company morale may have taken a beating, CareerBuilder said.

On top of that, replacing a worker is also expensive.

Hiring managers in Britain indicated a poor hiring choice was the most costly in 2012 with 27 percent of survey respondents saying a bad hiring decision cost their company $77,544 or more.

In Germany, 29 percent indicated a bad hire cost $65,231 or more and in the United States about same percentage — 27 percent — indicated $50,000 or more was the price associated with making a poor hiring decision.

In India, 29 percent indicated the average hire that soured cost $37,150. In China, the cost exceeded $48,734, nearly half of the respondents — 48 percent — indicated.

In general, CareerBuilder said, lower morale at the company and the cost of hiring a replacement worker was the damage cited by hiring managers from the United States, while managers from BRIC countries — Brazil, Russia, India and China — were more apt to point to loss of revenue or productivity as the problem associated with a bad hiring choice.

At the top of the list, 88 percent of Russian employers indicated they had made a bad hiring choice. In Brazil, 87 percent indicated they had done so. In China 87 percent, in India 84 percent and in the United States 66 percent of employers indicated they had made a bad hire in 2012.

“Making a wrong decision regarding a hire can have several adverse consequences across an organization,” said Matt Ferguson, CareerBuilder’s chief executive officer.

“When you add up missed sales opportunities, strained client and employee relations, potential legal issues and resources to hire and train candidates, the cost can be considerable,” he said.

This survey was conducted online Nov. 1-30, 2012, within the United States, Brazil, China, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Russia and the Britain with 400 to 2,611 respondents from each country, CareerBuilder said.

The results of the survey, it can be said with 95 percent certainty, include a margin of error of 1.9-4.9 percentage points.

UPI - United Press International, Inc.

Since 1907, United Press International (UPI) has been a leading provider of critical information to media outlets, businesses, governments and researchers worldwide.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Hiring Blunders Are Expensive, Managers Say”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at


Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.