Gubernatorial Candidate Pushes Legislation That Already Passed Three Years Ago Without His Support


Gubernatorial Candidate Pushes Legislation That Already Passed Three Years Ago Without His SupportWhile on the campaign trail late last week, Minnesota State Republican Representative Tom Emmer lent his support to a piece of legislation that would set aside higher education scholarships for the families of fallen soldiers.

Emmer, who is currently running for governor of Minnesota, told a small group of veterans that it is time to create a state GI bill, according to The Star Tribune.

"I don’t know if you remember, a few years ago the governor had proposed [a Minnesota GI bill]," Emmer told the crowd. "And I think that’s something we should certainly be looking at and it’s unfortunate we haven’t done something like that already."

However, what may be more unfortunate for Emmer is that the state government created a GI bill three years ago. The measure was passed as part of a higher education appropriations bill, a piece of legislation that Emmer voted against, the news source reports.

The gubernatorial candidate’s spokesman Bill Walsh took responsibility for the mix-up, attributing it to "bad staff work."

Walsh also noted that Emmer only opposed the measure because it did not allocate enough money to the GI bill, while overfunding other programs.

Emmer will be running against three Democrats in the gubernatorial election set to take place this November.

Personal Liberty

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.