Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty
 

Google Expands Lobbying Efforts In Attempt To Influence Web-Related Policies

November 2, 2010 by  

Google expands lobbying efforts in attempt to influence Web-related policiesOne of the most powerful brands in the world has increased its spending on political lobbying this past year.

Consumer Watchdog reported that Google spent $1.2 million during the third quarter of the fiscal year in its efforts to shape Federal policy, which is 11 percent higher than its expenditures last year during the same period of time. The corporation has paid out $3.92 million during three quarters this year after spending $4.03 million in all of 2009.

Among the issues Google is trying to influence is online advertising regulation, consumer protection, cloud computing and broadband access. John Simpson, director of Consumer Watchdog's Inside Google Project, said that the company is well-connected to legislators and spending in 2010 could reach $5 million.

According to the magazine Fast Company, Google officials project that there will be a flurry of campaign advertisements reaching Web browsers in the days leading up to the midterm elections. These ads, called "Google bombs" will appear on millions of sites as politicians attempt to reach out to voters in the moments before they head to the polls.

The news source reports that the Web-ad tactic was pioneered by U.S. Senator Scott Brown (R-Mass.), who defeated Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley in a special election in January 2010. Brown's victory was considered an upset in a state that traditionally elects Democrats into Congress.

"A lot of campaigns saw the success [Brown] had and how he kind of caught this wave of momentum online, and they are trying to recreate that,” Andrew Roos, Google's political ad strategist told the news provider.

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to yousoundoff@personalliberty.com by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Google Expands Lobbying Efforts In Attempt To Influence Web-Related Policies”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • 45caliber

    Are we supposed to be surprised at this?

    • ValDM

      Just consider the money they contributed to the campaigns as money they got for selling our personal data to marketers. They’re making more money from selling our info than they get from advertisers, and must continue or go under. The lefty-loonies are giving them whatever they want and Google wants to maintain the status quo.

  • http://none Mike

    Notice the google china symbol there at the bottom of the sign I dont think we should miss that either.

  • s c

    Google is doing a classic imitation of a company that has sold its money-grubbing arse to the highest bidder. It’s good that Google is getting competition from other search engines. In the event that Google becomes an agent for the government, we will need all the help we can get in protecting the internet.
    I hope I’m wrong, but the folks at Google are on the wrong path. Anyone who tries to wreck the 1st Amendment will make more enemies than friends.
    Remember, when and if the 1st Amendment is cancelled, the next amendment to be targeted will be the 2nd.

Bottom
close[X]

Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to PersonalLiberty.com,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.