Comments Subscribe to Personal Liberty News Feed Subscribe to Personal Liberty
 

Gingrich Accuses President Of Using ‘Dishonest Scare Tactics’

May 13, 2011 by  

Gingrich accuses President of using 'dishonest scare tactics'Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich has announced his intentions to run for the 2012 GOP Presidential nomination.

On May 11, the Republican revealed his candidacy via Facebook and Twitter. Later that night, Gingrich appeared on FOX News’ Hannity and said that President Barack Obama “should be ashamed of himself” for distorting the GOP’s positions.

Gingrich accused the President of using “dishonest scare tactics” to describe Representative Paul Ryan’s (R-Wis.) budget proposal. Obama has criticized Ryan’s plan to cut about $4 trillion in Federal spending over the next decade, saying that it would leave some senior citizens without Medicare coverage.

Although Gingrich is a household name, a recent Gallup Poll indicates that he has some work to do in order to become a bona fide frontrunner. According to the survey of more than 3,000 Republican voters, former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney lead the pack.

Former Alaska Governor and Tea Party favorite Sarah Palin placed third in most demographics, although she received the most votes among respondents with salaries that are less than $24,000 per year.

Palin led Gingrich in most categories except among Americans earning $90,000 or more per year. The former House Speaker received 9 percent of the votes, compared to Palin’s 7 percent.

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to yousoundoff@personalliberty.com by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Facebook Conversations

Join the Discussion:
View Comments to “Gingrich Accuses President Of Using ‘Dishonest Scare Tactics’”

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

Is there news related to personal liberty happening in your area? Contact us at newstips@personalliberty.com

  • B. Holmes

    Gingrich would easily be our best president because of his vast experience. But, unfortunately, his romantic life will be an obstacle even though many left wingers want special homosexual rights. And, you know, we must elect those do-gooders.

    • Colleen

      Ah, yes, the old double standard rises again! I could care less if a president’s past is sterling or not….just as long as he/she has straightened out the past mistakes and moves forward.
      If anyone on the left wants to start slinging mud, don’t forget to talk about Bill and others!

      • Bob from Calif.

        I don’t trust anyone that is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Gingrich is a member. The CFR has been selling this country out for years in favor of the New World Order agenda.

        • Void1972

          Bob
          And Ron Paul is the only person running on the left and right that is not a member of the CFR. The rest of them are all corrupt!

        • http://Illinois'17th Old Henry

          Very good point Bob. And yet another reason to NOT vote for Gingrich.

        • metalflyer11

          I agree with you 100%. Newt is a globalist like many of the others mentioned in the article. It is very interesting that in most articles you read about the possible frontrunners for the Republican Party, Ron Paul is never mentioned and I know for sure he has plenty of support from the people. This is to prove that the power elite are allready manipulating the game.

      • JUKEBOX

        I sincerely hope ALL of the GOP candidates make a point of how mendacious and duplicitous Obama is, and how many legally questionable actions he has performed during his life. Many of these are verified in his own writings, but the liberal myrmidons can not see any wrong he has ever done. RAM it to him on every chance you have.

    • http://comcast the fisherman

      Gibgrich and Pailn are the same. They came from the same mold. They were born with their mouths open saying the same thing over and over again. Just like a fox trying to catch his own tail. What a choice

      • http://Illinois'17th Old Henry

        fisherman:

        We do have a choice – Ron Paul.

    • EddieW

      Obozo, our Liar in chief is now using FEAR tactics, Hope and change are gone!! Newt Gingrich is a traitor to the constitution of this Country!! He advocates ‘curtailing” Freedom of Speech, and without Freedom of speech, we have NO Freedoms!! He has a lot of excess baggage, that I hope stalls his candidacy, so I won’t have to spend my life’s savings to stop him, as I have pledged to do!!

      • Bob from Calif.

        I agree, Gingrich is a wolf in sheeps clothing.

    • Jim

      So what? Newt had some temptation that got the best of him. Could any of you out there stand up to and come out squeaky clean if your life was examined from every angle?
      he hasn’t done anything that a lot of other presidents haven[‘t done. Does that make it right, should it be condoned in all candidates from here on in? NO, but that is the way that it is and what you do with your sex life, as long as it is heterosexual, is not going to interfere with any decisions that need to be made in politics.
      Hell, even a great general like Eisenhower was messing with his WWII female drive and even bound to a wheelchair FDR found time for a little hanky panky.
      If you do not vote for Newt based on his past indiscretions you are making one terrible mistake and denying this country the services of a man that will tell it like it is and get us back on track.

      • JUKEBOX

        Besides the birth certificate, I wonder how much money has been spent on covering up Obama’s homosexual activities. Michelle managed to stop anyone from publishing the book about his cocaine laced sexual trysts with other men.

      • http://Illinois'17th Old Henry

        Jim:

        I will NOT vote for Gingrich because he is a RINO. He has embraced the Global Warming fraud, he has stated that the era of Reagan is over, and as mentioned above he is a member of the CFR, just to name a few.

    • Jerry

      First, when I see people write things like, honesty, qualified, etc. I want to say, “What the hell were people thinking when they voted for Obama?” Second, I wish the federal government wouldn’t spend time and tax payer money on gay and lesbian rights (we all have rights as an American) and abortion. I am a Republican and neither one of these issues affect me.

      Third, I want the federal government to make available everything that they are spending money on in the FY budget. Why are we not able to see these things? I understand National Security and I am not asking to see this type of material, but, I want to know what these jackholes are spending.

      Fourth and final, I thought Obama wanted to get rid of all of these lobbyist in Washington. These special interest groups are killing us. It is time for the people to tell Washington that we want these tards out of DC and we don’t want our politicians listening to anything they have to say or take money from these people.

      • http://?? Joe H.

        Jerry,
        i don’t know about your local paper, but ours prints up each reps voting record for the past week. I have decided to vote against my congressman on just that record! Don’t worry, I have given him a chance to say the paper lied about him, but he has confirmed every one of the votes I have enquired about!

    • http://Illinois'17th Old Henry

      Gingrich is a RINO – and part of the problem, not part of the solution. He has stated he believes in Global Warming, which a a fraud, and he has stated the the era of Reagan is over.

      Ron Paul is the only worthy candidate running. Palin is out as she helped get that doddering ond fool RINO McCain re-elected in AZ.

      • Jim

        OldHenry, where did you study and what are your degrees for being qualified to state that global warming is totally wrong? Cold you enlighten us as to what the real cause is for the increased, in events and severity, acts of nature that have caused so much grief, death and destruction all around the world.
        Being qualified to do so must surely give you some insight as to the fact or myth, cause and consequence of the fast approaching 12/21/12.

  • http://burkecomputers.blogspot.com/ DanB

    At the current going rate, it looks like this presidential election may be little better than the last where I felt like I was voting for the lesser of two bad choices instead of trying to guess which was the better of two good choices.

  • Carlucci

    YUCK!! You must be kidding. Newt Gingrich is a repulsive, big, fat, big government RINO!! I wouldn’t vote for him under any circumstances. If you want status quo politics as usual (i.e., thievery) to continue, then keep voting for people like him.

    • DavidL

      Hit the nail on the head, Carlucci. Good for you. Ginrich is a blowhard.

    • ValDM

      C,
      Gingrich, Kerry, et.al: None of these CAN do the job. Where are the REAL candidates?

    • GRusling

      You might want to check your history book.

      While there’s little doubt Gingrich isn’t a Tea Party stalwart or strict constitutionalist, he’s the man who held Clinton’s feet to the fire and achieved a balanced budget (for the only time in my 70 year long life) during the 1990′s. He’s the man who put forward the “Contract With America” in 1994 and fought to get Congress to fulfill all its requirements, until the National Republican Leadership finally forced him out of office in 1998 (that’s right folks, LIBERAL REPUBLICANS are the ones who did it).

      Gingrich is a fiscal conservative to the point the “PARTY” (Republican, that is) couldn’t control him so it cut him loose. They did the same thing with Bob Barr once they were through “using” him.

      Gingrich might not be our “ideal” candidate but at the moment he’s the best we’ve got. The man who would disappoint everyone is Huckabee, because once you move out of the “Religious” category he’s a social AND fiscal liberal. Check his record in Arkansas…

      • Piglett

        GRusling, Have to agree with you. Experience counts and I watched Ginrich take the Dems and Clinton, kicking and screaming to Welfare Reform. It takes a crook to catch a crook, and political experience counts, as to knowing where all the vulnerabilities and manipulation lyes in Congress.
        On the other hand, I am coming to a conclusion that the “team” of President and Vice President is very important this next year. A businessman, non lawyer, with principles and problem solving clarity who has a vice president for advice and ability to whip Congress to pass reforms that are needed in priority areas. One has to known where the skeletons lye, how to politic with the Congress and knows U.S. precedent and law to advise with conservative legal advisors, a President who is from outside the beltway and determined to manage with clarity, integrity and clear goals. A strong and experienced team in that white house. One thing about Chaney that I liked from the beginning, was his age and health and clear understanding that he wouldnt run for President, so Bush could trust him to not be undermining him while Bush was serving. Ginrich knows history and politics, and has age and experience, but I would rather see him as the Vice President and someone like Herman Cain, or any number of other less political but business experienced people as President. What do you think?

        • Ray Anderson

          I think you have real savie (sp) I’d like Hermann Cain very much also! That sounds like a good combo, forget the pun as pertaining to H.C’s former occupation!

          • Ray Anderson

            After watching the video from the John Birch Society, about Newt. looks to me like Obozo,Newt, 6 of one half a dozen of the other, looks like a lot of people have put their confidence into Newt. as a defender of freedom, I submit that he is about as phony as a football bat!!!

        • http://Illinois'17th Old Henry

          Pigglett:

          Gingrich should run for president of the CFR or the NWO.

          Ron Paul for President. Herman Cain is a close second so a good VP choice.

      • http://?? Joe H.

        GRusling,
        go to the GAO site and check out what you claim. Clinton NEVER had a balanced budget!!! He spent the social security money earmarked for payout to make it look balanced when in reality he was spending the same money TWICE!!! There was a slight deficit!! I will grant you that he came close, but no CIGAR!!!

        • http://Illinois'17th Old Henry

          No Cigar. I like that one JoeH!

          I wonder ifn that one made it to his Presidential Museum / Massage Parlor.

      • http://Illinois'17th Old Henry

        GRusling:

        “Gingrich might not be our “ideal” candidate but at the moment he’s the best we’ve got”.

        Absolutely wrong. Ron Paul is the best we have. For quite some time I was behind Cain, but that was before Paul got serious.

    • Bud Tugly

      You are so right. Blow-hard Gingrich is as phony as a three dollar bill. He vacillates all over the place and is no more trustworthy than the bozo in office now.

      • JUKEBOX

        Obama is phonier than counterfeit Confederate money. Gingrich is smarter than the best five in Obama’s administration combined. There will always be corruption in Washington, just different levels.

      • Jim

        Gingrich sees the Muslim surge in to this country for what it is and has no trouble speaking out against them in many of his speeches.
        We certainly need someone of that caliber to stop the surrender of this country, thru political correctness, to those that are using our freedoms to destroy those freedoms. Read the Quran – ALL OF IT not just the part that was written in Mecca – what part of kill do you not understand? The real trouble will make itself known when they have the majority religion and population in this country and then it will be too late for the fuzzy warm feeling people!

    • Ray Anderson

      Right on Carlucci!!

      • http://?? Joe H.

        Very Good Call Carucci!!! WE need DUNCAN HUNTER SR!!!!!

    • http://certus-certus.blogspot.com RAYM0ND HARBIN

      THERE IS AN INFAMOUS/FAMOUS LINE WHICH WAS TOSSED AT OBAMA BY A REPUBLICAN CONGRESS (“YOU LIE.”) AND OBAMA DID LIE AND SO DO YOU, ON YOUR COMMENTS. I HAVE KNOWN NEWT CLOSELY, FOR 33 YEARS — BUT I’M NOT SURE I WILL VOTE FOR HIM–BECAUSE I DON’T KNOW THE POWER OF THE OTHER CANDIDATES. I AM 73, I HAVE KNOWN A GREAT NUMBER OF FEDERAL OFFICE HOLDERS, BOTH DEMOCRAT AND REPUBLIC. NEWT IS LOVED BY MOST TEA PARTY STALWARTS THAT I HAVE ME; AND, HANDS DOWN, HE IS THE MOST INTELLIGENT AND KNOWLEDGEABLE OF ANY OF OUR CANDIDATES OR ANY OF THEIRS. THE BIGGEST MISTAKE THE SOCIALISTS COULD MAKE IS TO PUT OBAMA IN A DEBATE WITH GINGRICH. AND THEY KNOW IT.

      • http://certus-certus.blogspot.com RAYM0ND HARBIN

        MY ABOVE COMMENT— WAS IN REPLY TO CARLUCCI

  • Badbob

    Who cares if the scare tactics are honest or dishonest. They should not be used at all.

    • JUKEBOX

      You want to be scared? Did you ever wonder how many of Obama’s relatives were involved in the attack on the American Embassy in Kenya a few years back?

  • mike

    I like Newt. In the coming months he’ll become a more acceptable candidate as his message and image are hewn and the skeletons of his youth are excised from his closet.
    The guy that interests me however is Herman Cain. Seems to be a very sharp minded.
    A candidate like him would completely foil any race issues and force many black and politically correct lefties to vote the issues versus ideals.

    • azwayne

      Slowly many are coming around, CAIN is 10 times better than Gingrich. By primary time we could be on winning track. I don’t mind gingrich getting the slams out there, the more the better. I think that’s the best Palin can do too. There are respected speakers who can get the message accross even if not great candidates. Newt’s baggage won’t allow his success.

      • Piglett

        40 years ago Kennedy’s being Catholic was going to be to much baggage for election. Reagan was the first devorced Presdent on top of being a movie actor, with no way of winning. Clinton didnt inhale so he was out of the ring and Bush II was too much of a good ole boy cowboy to get elected. Then there is Obama. Admitted to cocaine, possibly born in Kenya, no work history or “baggage” verifiable except that he filed suit aganst Illinois to allow criminals to vote and some community organizing, went to a elite and expensive Eastern College that most of our kids couldnt afford with honest application, and that he served as a part time Constitutional Lawyer with no experience working with constitutional Law. Using this baggage argument aganst all the candidates is like saying we want someone like a terrorist, who flies using cash and like Usama who stashes cash inside his tunic for the fast get away.
        Seems to me we kill the messenger every day when we repeat the media and liberal talking points that tell us not who would be good or experienced at President, but who tell us all the reasons they don’t want a person to win.
        Except for citizenship and age, anyone with the money can be and should be President, especially since we have shown through past presidency’s that we are not as moral or Judeo/Christian nation as for the first 200 years. I want someone with empathy for divorced and flawed individuals and different circumstances in life. Someone who has managed kids and family, and managed all the laws and controls of civilian business and someone who knows how to appoint and find govt experience and political savvy people in positions that help the Presidency function.
        I want a President who sees how the Justice Dept is being politicized and used as a battering ram aganst the States who don’t share the Presidents party or goals. Someone who will use Administrative Orders to cut through the crap, but then will legislate some control and timelines on those same Administartive Orders and their use for subvertying congress and checks and balance. I could go on, but having “baggage” is just another way for the pundits and political parties to kill our possible messengers and they fear anyone who has name recognition, popular support, savvy business knowledge over law school, and who might gain any support from large special and minority interest groups. When all else fails and a good candidate with experience and values shows up, they label them a Evangelical or radical Christian or Jew. Let the criticism be about their experience, knowledge of history and past mistakes made with our very own Constitution and admits to mistakes when made in the past. Color has no bearing upon who I vote for, but childhood or education of any kind that reinforced racial divides, national break down of states going back to Mexico, or Nation of Islam Black nationalism, would be a important consideration for me. I want somoneone who has lived equality and equal rights as a goal, who has walked the talk. Not someone who uses special interest groups and minority status to redistribute money and American History and our future.

        I want a real man or woman who can make tough decisions and lead, not someone who will through anyone under the bus when they question the leaders Constitutionality or question his integrity. Up until the day before Usama was taken down, the President refused to show a real or forged Birth Certificate to stop rumors, court cases and distrust by American Citizens. He allowed govt employees who serached records to be fired, allowed Military Personnel to be discharged for doing thier sworn duty, and encouraged the Democratic Party and Liberal Media in their labeling and attacks on average citizens who dared to question his very qualifications, according to the most knowable and basic Constitutional standards, in court and out. Yet two days before he orders the CIA and Miltary to assassinate a Terrorists in a sovereign nation, he takes the time to casually bring out a Birth Certificate?

        Did his Oath of Office to uphold the constitution, just go into effect for him, almost three years after he was sworn in? Was Trump and the renewal of the politics of his birth issue so much more intimidating than Courts and the first election? Or do you think he was just a little intimidated by his lack of military and Holders actions aganst the CIA, local police departments and the busting of Lt. Larkin, that he doubted his own Military and CIA following orders, that his lawyers were telling him were questionable at the least, though popular in the extreme? Maybe with Mubarrek and Quaddfi both Dictators with vanishing support from their own Military, our President thought his birth certificate would give him some trust and legality that he hadnt been able to obtain through “trust me, I am your Presdent” cover-up and legal manipulation. Who said “timing is everything”? While Trump took credit for the BC outing, his baggage in the accountability and support of the Constitution and “his people”, is a little thin. Perjury and Lying under Oath is still a crime for the majority of people, and I don’t want a president who lets the little people below him take the rap for his/her misdeeds. We either still have checks and balances or we don’t. We either treat all people equally under the law, or we have law by exceptions. Double jeopardy is still trying people for the same crime twice and re investigating the CIA for torture, lawfully reviewed and ordered by a previous President is nothing but double jeopardy and politics by someone who has issued some questionable orders himself. So lets get past the label of “baggage” and look to the content of character, experience and basic honesty. That would be a step in the right direction.

        • http://comcast the fisherman

          Let face it. There is one out there that walk the talk. If there is one he or she is talking fron the wrong side of their mouth. There was a failer in groming a person for the job. We are just have to suck it up.

        • Ray Anderson

          Shing it to me one more time will you Charley?

        • http://certus-certus.blogspot.com RAYM0ND HARBIN

          SOME EXCELLENT POINTS PIGLETT. I WONDER WHEN WE DECIDED THAT NO HAT IN THE RING WILL BE ACCEPTED WITHOUT A HALO:

          FDR WAS MARRIED BUT LIVED WITH ANOTHER WOMAN WHILE PRESIDENT.

          JFK HAD OODLES OF GIRL FRIENDS,WHILE PRESIDENT INCLUDING MARLYN
          MONROE.

          LBJ, A HEAVY BOOZER GAVE NAKED POOL PARTIES AT THE WHITE HOUSE, AND TRIED TO GET IN BED WITH A WELL KNOWN LADY JOURNALIST, WHO RESISTED, AND HE INDIGNANTLY REPLIED: “THIS IS YORE PRESERDENT.” SHE WON THE ARGUMENT, SHE REPORTED.

          AND, ALL OF US CAN VOUCH FOR HIS HOLINESS, SAINT WILLIAM OF CLINTON.

          ALL OF THESE ARE DEMOCRATS, AND WERE GIVEN A FREE PASS BY AN EVER FAWNING MEDIA. NO PLEA HERE FOR LICENSE, BUT IT’S TIME TO FACE THE FACT THAT THIS COUNTRY IS IN PROFOUNDLY DEEP TROUBLE. OBAMA IS IN THE CORE OF A LOOMING NATIONAL CATASTROPHE, AND THIS NATION’S FUTURE IS IN OUR HANDS. THE ARRAY OF POTENTIAL, POSSIBLE AND PROBABLE CANDIDATES HAS NOT COMPLETELY FORMED–WE YET HAVE DISTANCE BEFORE THE PRIMARY, AND THE ARRAY WILL MORPH SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE INTERIM– IT ALWAYS HAS. GINGRICH, MAY NOT BE OUR MAN; BUT IF NOT WE WILL HAVE LOST OUR MOST INTELLIGENT, IMAGINATIVE AND KNOWLEDGEABLE CANDIDATE IN OUR FIELD. THE DEMOCRATS KNOW THAT NEWT GINGRICH WOULD DESTROY OBAMA IN ANY POLITICAL DEBATE. NEITHER WE, NOR THE DEMOCRATS, HAVE A MAN WITH THE ENORMOUS CAPACITY FOR MENTAL RETENTION PLUS THE VOCABULARY AND FINESSE TO USE THESE AS A SWORD TO RIP AN OPPONENT APART. JUST ONE MORE POINT, THE E DEMOCRATS REALIZE THIS MORE CLEARLY THAN YOU DO. THEY WILL FIGHT HIM TOOTH AND NAIL TO KILL HIM AT THE PRIMARY– SO OBAMA WON’T HAVE TO MEET HIM IN A DEBATE. NEWT IS A TRULY BRILLIANT MAN, KNOWN BY “GENIUS” BY THE EDUCATED. HIS MENTAL PROWESS IS REAL; OBAMA’S GENIUS IS A DEMOCRAT HATCHED FRAUD. HOW MUCH DO THEY LOSE IF DEMONSTRATED IN A NATIONALLY TELEVISION DEBATE??.

      • http://certus-certus.blogspot.com RAYM0ND HARBIN

        AZWAYNE–I TREMBLE KNOWING OF THE INCREDIBLY DAUNTING TASK WE FACE, ESPECIALLY WHEN I REALIZE JUST HOW SHALLOW SOME OF THE “CONSERVATIVES” ARE WHO SHARE IN THIS JOB OF SENDING OBAMA BACK TO CHICAGO. A VERY ANEMIC KNOWLEDGE BASE IS REQUIRED TO GIVE CREDENCE TO YOUR CRITIQUE (TO SAY NOTHING OF YOUR 10x EQUATION OF GINGRICH Vs CAIN). I LIKE CAIN VERY MUCH; LIVING IN METRO ATLANTA, AS CAIN DOES, I HAVE LISTENED ATTENTIVELY TO HIS RADIO SHOW SINCE HE BEGAN BROADCASTING. BUT THIS CRISIS IS NOT ABOUT A THIRD GRADE SCHOOL POPULARITY CONTEST– OUR CANDIDATE WILL GO UP AGAINST THE MOST CRIMINALLY CORRUPT AND DEVIOUS STREET GANG TO EVER SIT DOWN IN WASHINGTON. WE MUST HAVE A MAN WHOSE BEEN NECK DEEP IN COMBAT BEFORE– NOT A NEW RECRUIT, NO MATTER HOW GOOD HE MAY LOOK. THIS JOB REQUIRES AN INTELLIGENT (CAIN IS), EXPERIENCED, (CAIN ISN’T) WASHINGTON SAVVY, (CAIN ISN’T) PROFESSIONAL, POLITICALLY STRONG INFIGHTER. NEWT HAS DEMONSTRATED THAT HE IS, (BUT CAIN, WE DON’T KNOW). WE DON’T GET A SECOND CHANCE. WE MUST PUT OUR VERY BEST TEAM ON THE ON THE FIELD. CAIN IS VERY IMPRESSIVE IN BACKGROUND AND DEDICATION TO AMERICA: A SUPERB V.P. SPOT. YOU HAVE EVERY SINGLE RIGHT TO YOUR OPINION, BUT PLEASE DON’T GIVE OBAMA A LIFT BY BEATING UP ON OUR MOST QUALIFIED SOLDIER TO BEAT OBAMA’S BUTT. ONE OF THE COMMENTATORS HERE HAD USED THE “GINGRICH HAS HAD MORE WIVES THAN bIN LADEN BIT.” THIS LITTLE JEWEL ORIGINATED NOT ON NIGHT TIME TV, BUT IN THE DEMOCRAT SENATE AND SPREAD OUT ALL OF THE CONGRESS AND THE MEDIA BY THE OBAMA CZARS. AND THIS GUY, UNKNOWINGLY, USED THIS LITTLE SNICKER SHOT TO ABET THE COUNTRY’S WORST PROBLEM. THE DEMOCRAT BIG SHOTS ARE PETRIFIED OF NEWT GINGRICH, THEY REMEMBER HIS WRATH OF THE NINETIES. THEY WILL PRE-PRIMARY ATTACK NEWT WITH MORE FIREPOWER THAN ANY FIVE OTHER REPUBLICANS RUNNERS COMBINED. IF YOU DON’T LIKE NEWT NOW, JUST WAIT UNTIL (IF) YOU DO. BUT, PLEASE DON’T AID THE SOCIALISTS BY SLAMMING THEIR WORST NIGHTMARE.

    • Bob from Calif.

      The lefties, Black or White will turn against Cain. They have no room for someone with honesty, morality, and integrity in their idealogical closet. They will throw him under the buss just like the National Organization for Women did Palin and Bachman

      • JUKEBOX

        Who among us will have the guts to call those duplicitous liberals the BIGOTS and RACISTS that they truly are?

        • http://?? Joe H.

          JUKEBOX,
          HAVE YOU BEEN READING THE POSTS HERE???? A lot of us have been calling the libbies that very thing!!!

      • Cawmun Cents

        Running Cain would smoke out where the real racism exsists,within the framework of the Democratic party.However,the fact that he is another black man will go against him in this way:If a liberal has a choice between someone who is portrayed as a person who is championing the rights of entitlements for all,he will be seen as a better choice than someone who would not.If those are the two choices for a black or person of spanish dialect,then the choice will be to stay with the guy they know,rather than choose sensibly,the better man for the job.In other words you will be throwing the election for Obama,if you choose to let Mr. Cain represent you.Most intelligent people will understand that the better man is the better man.But many of the inner city folk which have eschewed education to run the streets can still vote.They wont even note the counter statements that Mr. Cain is the better candidate.Because he will not represent their meal ticket like Obama does.So you will have the same condition you had last cycle.And Obama will win again.

        • http://?? Joe H.

          CC,
          so let a good constitutional conservative run and make hollow promises to the libbies like Nobummer did and then not keep them like Nobummer did!! I would pay to see the looks on the progressive crappers faces when he did that to them!!!

          • Cawmun Cents

            While I commiserate with the outcome in a situation like you have posted,I have to disagree with using the same tactics as Obama uses.That will not be seen as differentiating yourself from the progressives.Also,it must be said that after election the new candidate not be seen in the media as much as Obama has.This will give people the notion of the same old progressive game.The one where you look good but have no substance,and even less character and integrity.Yeah doing that over again will be disatrous for any public official.You see a Hollywood-like essence being attributed to the POTUS.This is done deliberately so that he is in the hearts and minds of the people constantly.It is the same progressive tactics which have been used to create a sense of leadership pride in places like Venezuela,Cuba,and North Korea.You are being fooled,and you WILL learn to like it.

  • Robin from Arcadia, IN

    Newt has made some very bad blunders in his lifetime. I don’t think he can be trusted. He is just one of good ole boys of politics. If he is our next President, it will be much of the same as it has been.

    • Cawmun Cents

      Newt will not win against Obama.His name will be characterized as amphibian,which is being stuck between fish and reptile.That will be a never ending source of derision by the leftists.You will hand the election to Obama if you nominate this man.

  • Wayne Wathen

    I’m so glad that Newt is getting into the race. He and Trump should have fun comparing girl friends, wives, and their conquests of women while married to other women. Should be fun with these outstanding role models.

    • JUKEBOX

      I’d rather have them comparing those things than Obama comparing with Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Bill Ayers, and Van Jones their lies and deceptions they fed to the DUMB MASSES to win the Presidency.

    • http://?? Joe H.

      Wayne Walthen,
      At least they would be comparing wives and girl friends unlike Nobummers and Bawney’s boyfriends and male conquests!!!

      • http://Illinois'17th Old Henry

        JoeH:

        Maybe they could compare hemorroids…

  • newspooner

    CFR

  • EmilyC

    Honestly folks, can ANYONE be worse than Obozo–no matter what race? I’m not a fan of adultery, etc., but for God’s sake, why is it that everything else can be the right mix for a prez and the only thing that stands out is the womanizing, even though it looks like Newt has finally settled down. But I’ve got to tell you–from what little we know about Obozo and from the lying we’ve put up with for 3+ years, is it okay that the only thing Obozo did right was play around? We don’t know that he hasn’t. It’s all the other stuff that makes him a bad prez. If we had known that he’d have common to visit the WH, would that have turned anyone off? Does Wright, Ayers, Soros, Jones, all the other Hitlers bother anyone? Well it bothers me! I’d rather a repentent Newt than another f’ing lying dem liberal, that gets a talk show after hookering, ever again–and I think many Americans are with me about that. I’m tired of the media trying to tell people what to think!

    • Polski

      After 8 years of Dubya and Cheney, how can you ask if anyone is worse than Obama? I think Obama is terrible, but then Dubya and Cheney were HORRIBLE.

    • Ray Anderson

      Excellent perspective!!

    • JUKEBOX

      Well said Emily!!!

  • Sheople Proof

    When did you first discover this Newt?

  • Dale B

    Let’s see, Presidents and reported womanizing…. FDR? JFK? Bill Clinton (who, by the way was elected despite the stories flying around regarding his extra-marital activities), and who knows about others? I do NOT condone extra-marital affairs, and believe that trust is the big issue- can I trust a President (male or female) that lies and/or cheats? Obviously not. That’s why I didn’t trust Kennedy, didn’t trust Clinton, don’t trust Obama, don’t trust Gingrich. Would I vote for Gingrich over Obama? Absolutely, because I believe he’s much more capable of running the country in the direction that I want to see it run. Would I choose Gingrich over someone like Pawlenty or Huckabee? Probably not, but I have to do my homework. I’d also like to see someone like Alan Keyes step up to the plate, as well as Herman Cain, and do my homework on each of these men as well. Sarah Palin is a diamond in the rough right now, and in my view has made a couple serious political gaffs- the most serious is that of quitting the position, even though I think I understand why.

    • independant thinker

      To become a viable presidential candidate Sara needs to serve a term or two in the house or a term in the senate.

      • Ray Anderson

        Even w/o that experience, she’d beat out this on the job training clown!!

        • JUKEBOX

          There a few hundred thousand people in the U.S. that could do better than Obama has. I could have done better myself for a lot less than $14 trillion.

          • http://Illinois'17th Old Henry

            Well Jukebox, Little Barry is doing a fine job if judged by what he campaihned on – FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGING OUR COUNTRY.

            Judged by that standard he is doing fine, and just what the morons in this country ELECTED HIM TO DO.

      • http://Illinois'17th Old Henry

        Gee Independant, you mean like Little Barry the community organizer?

    • Bud Tugly

      When Palin quit the governorship to make the big bucks as a media diva she showed what was important to her… $$$$$.

      She talks the talk but is as vapid as a bimbo tv actress portraying a nuclear scientist uttering dialogue she has memorized but has no clue as to what it means.

      The country needs someone serious and thoughtful with deep understanding of our problems and respect for our constitution.

      • http://?? Joe H.

        Bud,
        Hey dim wit! she quit because of progs like you that kept bringing trumped up charge after trumped up charge against her that she actually concerned herself with how much it was costing the taxpayers to defend her!!! WHICH, BY THE WAY, she was cleared of all charges except one minor misdemeanor!!! I doubt YOU could do that if they researched and investigated YOUR life like that!!! I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that Nobummer couldn’t!!!

  • Jack

    No Newt, he is a globalist and part of the left right syndrome that has robbed us blind. If we keep electing these same clowns why shouldn’t we get robbed? They will know we as a people are too stupid to stop them.

  • BrotherPatriot

    Indeed Newt…if elected…would just be more of the same from the “Overclass” or “Elitists”…he’s just one of the good ol boyz and rubs shoulders with the CFR, Trilateral Commission and the rest of the Bilderberg equation.

    http://www.paulstramer.net/2009/12/real-newt-gingrich-wolf-in-sheeps.html

    Here’s some more truth/education for you to digest…if you have the stomach & discipline to take the time to watch it.

    God Bless.

  • Earl, QUEENS, NY

    So Newt is running for POTUS?? He was a great leader in taking back Congress and defeating the Democraps in 1994, and would’ve been a great candidate for POTUS in 1996 as opposed to Bob Dole. More recently though, I’m not sure. Is it possible Gingrich may be getting senile?? E.g., he seemed to be going along with Nazi Pelosi on the global warming scam. What we really need is a solid conservative who will stand up and say “NO” to the flat earth no growth environmentalist wackos, and better yet, one who wants to eliminate the EPA. And I’m also disappointed to recently hear that John Boehner seems to be encouraging Chris “Baby Shamu” Christie to run in 2012. Although he may be an improvement over his democrap predecessor Corzine, Baby Shamu is really not the type of conservative we really need. Instead of encouraging RINOs or Republi-crats to run, why not persuade Jim DeMint or Marco Rubio types to run?? Likewise, Herman Cain would make a great POTUS. He may lack political experience, but he has good ideas. As he recently told Mark Levin, Cain is a problem solver, not a politician. It sounds good to me!! BTW, what will Rev. Al Sharpton think if Herman Cain becomes the next POTUS?? LOL!! That could easily prove what Sharpton really is – a radical leftist, not a civil rights leader!!

    BUT LET’S NOT FORGET THE BOTTOM LINE: whoever the 2012 GOP nominee may be, even if it’s Donald Chump, Mitt-nitwit Romney or Baby Shamu, we must vote for him in 11/2012 as a vote against the One Big Awful Mistake America made by voters on 11/4/2008. REMEMBER – if BHO gets a second term, that’s the end of America as we knew it!!

    • Ray Anderson

      Kiss the free world tu-da-loo! You can bank on it, he has a real good chance if the dream act goes through, the Illegals could care less about our constitution, and what it stands for!!

  • Historian

    Newt has the best grasp of history of any candidate running. That said, it is the economy that is the number one issue. The current President with the congress blessing has put us in the most precarious economic situation since the great depression. Elect a physcal conservative who understands economics or at least follows the principles of sound ecoonomics. That should be the platform. We are too close to economic disaster to mess around on this election.

    • Piglett

      Am with you. Experience and knowledge of history and law and how to get Congress to enact law is the most important. Welfare reform was talked about for over 30 years, with it being one of those “third rails” of politics, so they said. But, Newt and others need to get off the current spin of Medicare Reform, for now and address the issues of the transfer from Welfare to SSI and Social Security, that some States performed on WElfare REform.

      Then what ever happened to cutting United Nations and Foreign Aid, Dept of Education, Environmental Protection and all the other newer additions to Law and Entitlements to individuals and States? Every little bit helps and this spin by the media and Dems that every suggestion is “to small” to help, is just more transference of the idea that they don’t want any of their sacred cows touched and the Republicans better be comprehensive in their look at the budget. Last in and first out, ie seniority of programs, is my mantra and Obamacare and SHIPPS, MEDICAID, Disability Pay (SSI) etc etc needs to be prioritized and placed upon the WElfare chopping block. I like his use of the new Administrative Order Doctrine to get the ball rolling with Oil and the Environmental Improvement Agency, but then even Admin Orders need to be limited for any new Presidents who want to subvert national laws and/or the Congress (as lame as they have become).

  • http://none Henry Stumpf

    The Hussein house of card and lies is about to come down. The sooner the better!!

  • Rcaston

    One thing is clear, the anti-Newt crowd on this site knows absolutely nothing about him EXCEPT his past relationship failures. How about lets focus on the present? After all, how many of you are ready to “cast the first stones?” Read any of his books? Watch any of his movies? No? Doesn’t surprise me. Know anything about what he has been doing these past 8 years? American Solutions? No? Stop the condescending holier than thou crap for a moment and do a little research. By far, he is the most intelligent candidate to announce. His grasp of the problems and his leadership skills speak for themselves. Is he perfect? Are you? Has he made mistakes? Have you? The fact is he is the ONLY politician, Republican or Democrat in my lifetime to actually do what he promised. He balanced the budget. He reformed welfare. And a whole host of other items in the 1994 Contract With America. And he did this with a Democrat President. What we need now, more than ever, is not the “perfect man” but a proven leader that not only understands the issues before us but has the experience to know what to do about them. So far, no one that has announced, or is likely to, can hold a candle to this guy. Baggage and all, he is the right guy for our current circumstances. I can’t wait for him to get into the debates. Especially if he gets to debate the Obamanation. He will clean Obama’s clock. It will be fun to watch!

    • BrotherPatriot

      Wrong…Rcaston…simply put…he want’s The Third Wave.

      Period.

      He’s more of the same and just a wolves in sheep clothing. He’s not a true Conservative.

      If you want the best conservative…vote Ron Paul.

      ^^ Now that’s a track record proven conservative! ^^

    • Jack

      I do not need to buy Newt’s books or DVD’s to know him. He is more of the same. He comes from the belly of the beast. I saw all I needed to see from his past performance in Washington.

  • Patriot

    We need someone that has not been a career politician, is not a member of the CFR, Tri-Laterial commision, IMF or Bilderberger! At this point, anyone would be better then what we have, but; we cannot settle, there is way too much at stake like liberty and freedom! With all the problems we are having our public servants are trying to pass legislation that would require companies awarded government contract to submit their poltical contributions prior to being awarded the contract (can anyone image, this is what they are fouced on?)! People really need to wake up before these idoits destroy what is left of our society!

  • http://certus-certus.blogspot.com RAYM0ND HARBIN

    I MET NEWT ABOUT 33 YEARS AGO WHEN HE WAS CAMPAIGNING HIS THIRD ATTEMPT AT UNSEATING ONE OF GEORGIA’S MOST POPULAR DEMOCRAT CONGRESSMEN. THIS TIME HE WON. IT HAD BECOME OBVIOUS TO THE ELECTORATE THAT THERE WAS SOMETHING VERY UNIQUE ABOUT NEWT. I WAS ON A SOUTHWESTERN METRO ATLANTA GINGRICH COMMITTEE WORKING ON CLEANING UP THE CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER– A LOVELY TROUT STREAM ON ATLANTA’S NORTH SIDE BUT A SEWER ON THE SOUTH SIDE WITH THE ENTRY OF ATLANTA’S SEWERAGE. I QUICKLY REALIZED AFTER ONLY THE FIRST MEETING THAT HE WAS VERY INTELLIGENT, WITH A NEAR-COMPUTER LEVEL MEMORY. THERE IS NO ONE ON THE LIST OF POTENTIAL PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES WHO IS EVEN CLOSE TO HIS INTELLECT AND COMMAND OF ANY DEBATE SHORT OF ADVANCED PHYSICS (AND, I’M NOT EVEN SURE OF HIS PROWESS ON THAT DISCIPLINE). IN A SOCIO-POLITICAL DEBATE WITH OBAMA- THIS FORMER HISTORY PROFESSOR WOULD BE AS POTENT AND SUCCESSFUL WITH THE PRESIDENT AS HE WOULD BE DEBATING ONE OF HIS FRESHMAN STUDENTS ON WORLD HISTORY. GINGRICH IS A GENUINELY EDUCATED AND BRILLIANT MAN– OBAMA, WHILE NOT STUPID, IS AN INTELLECTUAL FRAUD. MR.OBAMA WAS PROCLAIMED BY DEMO PROPAGANDISTS TO BE A “GENIUS”. IF THIS MAN IS A GENIUS THEN 85% OF NYC CABBIES ARE ALSO.
    WHEN A MAN’S IDEAS ARE AS RADICAL AS HIS–WE ARE SUPPOSED TO SAY, “OK, THIS SOUNDS LIKE A VERY BAD IDEA– BUT REMEMBER, HE IS PROFOUNDLY INTELLIGENT, SO WE JUST GO ALONG WITH HIS IDEAS BECAUSE HIS BRILLIANCE IS BEYOND OUR MEAGER UNDERSTANDING. GIVE ME A BREAK!!

    C.E.CUPP SAID RECENTLY: “GINGRICH IS NOT INSPIRING, AND HAS A LOT 0F BAGGAGE.” (SEVERAL MARRIAGES, ETC.) A– CUPP KNOWS OF HIM, BUT SHE DOES NOT KNOW HIM; AND, B– SINCE WHEN DID WE START REJECTING ALL COMERS WHO LACKED A HALO? FDR WAS MARRIED BUT LIVED WITH ANOTHER WOMAN SIMULTANEOUSLY WHILE HE WAS PRESIDENT. JFK, HAD, WHILE PRESIDENT OODLES OF GIRL FRIENDS, INCLUDING MARILYN MONROE. LBJ HAD NAKED SWIM PARTIES- AND ATTEMPTED TO ENTER THE BED OF A WELL KNOWN GUEST. WHEN THE GUEST REFUSE HE BECAME INDIGNANT AND SAID, “THIS IS YO PRESUDENT!!” AND OF COARSE WE ALL PAY HOMAGE TO SAINT WILLIAM OF CLINTON.

    OUR WOLF IS NOT AT THE DOOR– HE’S IN THE HOUSE. THE DEFEAT OF OUR MARXIST PRESIDENT MUST BE OBJECTIVE NUMBER ONE! GINGRICH MAY NOT BE OUR BEST CHOICE– BUT HE MUST GET AN UNBIASED, FAIR OPPORTUNITY TO SAY HIS PEACE. IT IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH A SOUND MIND TO REJECT OUR MOST GOVERNMENTALLY COMPETENT RUNNER BEFORE THE RACE EVEN BEGINS.

    • BrotherPatriot

      *GAG*

      I think I threw up alittle in my mouth…

      God Bless…(sorry…feeling alittle fiesty today I think.)

    • newspooner

      Gingrich, like Cheney, started out as a reasonably good conservative Congressman with a reasonably good record. Unfortuanately, he got “DC disease” and has become part of the Establishment. “Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.” — Gomer Pyle’s grandmother

      • Ray Anderson

        Right on Newspooner!!

    • Piglett

      Amen!

    • Ray Anderson

      I would recommend you watch the video, by the John Birch Society, about Newt!!

  • GRusling

    We need someone with PRINCIPLES, but it must be a person who is also ELECTABLE. If we could find enough “Principled Conservatives” to elect a President we’d be OK, but we can’t, so we must split-the-difference and find someone who can also appeal to Independents, the vast “moderate middle” who really aren’t interested in political details, only in good results for themselves.

    The truth is that Obama can be beat but we need a candidate who can appeal to a cross-section of America and talk circles around him. Gingrich can do that, and he doesn’t need a teleprompter to do it.

    Herman Cain would probably make an excellent President, but it’s hard to see how he could ever be elected. He would be chewed up and spit out by almost anyone on foreign policy, and probably knows very little on the domestic social front. If we were looking for a CFO he could win, but we’re not. I’ve always favored Allan Keyes but he can’t even win a primary, much less the general election.

    We’re not a majority. We’re representative of MAYBE 15% of the population, so for now, we have to concentrate on electing members of Congress (which we’ve proved we can do) and supporting the best Presidential candidate the Republican Party puts forward. Maybe we can swing a national election, but there’s no way we can put forward a winning candidate for President right now. The Progressives have a 100 year head start on us so we have to work SMART as well as hard…

    • Ray Anderson

      I really like Herman Cain, but no way would I vote for Newt, especially being in the CFR!!!!! Communistic!!!

  • Terry Gerling

    HISTORIAN,RCASTON,PATRIOT—-I COULD LISTEN TO YOU ALL DAY–YOUR THE CLOSEST THING TO A BREATH OF FRESH AIR SINCE RUSH—I LOVE IT—KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK—DON’T QUIT—DON’T EVER QUIT!!!!!!NOW- IS THE BEST CHANCE WE’VE GOT–MAYBE THE ONLY CHANCE– TO GIVE OUR GRANDKIDS AN AMERICA THAT OUR FOUNDERS DREAMT OF. PERFECT IS A DREAM-UNREALISTIC-I,LIKE MOST CONSERVATIVES, WANT SOMEONE TO VOTE FOR—NOT VOTE AGAINST–LETS NOT DO THAT TO OURSELVES AGAIN!!!!

  • MN

    Newt would be better than most. At least he in not bragging about himself every 5 minutes. the huck is a good Christian man, but he is into BIG goverment. My question is would he keep his word to America, He has so far, that is all we can go with. Oh yea maybe he won’t threat the job like a 4 year Vacation!

  • GRusling

    That “will he keep his word” is a question we can never answer until after the fact. The only two men in Washington I trust to always do that are Ron Paul and Colonel Allan West, and I’m afraid most people would be disappointed at how long it would take either of them to do so. A President simply doesn’t have the power to do much, unless he adopts the “Obama” approach and I certainly don’t want another like him…

  • http://com i41

    The idea some canidate needs to serve in the house or senate is BS, then there is too much familarity and good ole business as usual. I will take Cain or Trump any day over these recycled has beens. But anyone one is better than the f–king idoit in the WH or with a D by their name. Even a RINO would be better, because they might do some right some of the time, a dem always will do it wrong and screw up no matter what unless a conservative lays out the ground work plan!

  • Piglett

    Remember the phrase “single issue voter” that was famous and started during the Clintons campaigns? It has not gone away, and has been a goal of the Dems for more than 15 years now. Appeal to each individual issue, where ever your are. Talk with minorities talk Immigration and amnesty (again), talk to business talk growth and taxes, middle income talk empathy for the working poor and who ever is left of middle income, the poor the poor talk entitlement programs and the nasty Republicans who would stop transfering the wealth, then take credit for Planned Parenthood, Abortion or right to choose, gay rights and in the military and now show your macho by making the so called tough decision of killing Usama. Can you imagine if he knew where Usama was and told the staff and military to “forget it and not take Usama out?”. What a tough decision with no hope of it being kept 100% a secret if he failed to act.

    Lets hope that all the single issue voters and independents are smart enough and objective enough to see the big picture and vote for the very IDEOLOGY that made this country unique and a melting pot of ideas formed under the Ideology of a Republic, Equal Rights and nobody above or below the LAW of the Land. Ideology that was Capitalistic and Idividualistic with Charity and Freedom of Religion as the tenets of Truth and Individual Charity as the choice of Government and the people. With education as liberal and lacking in basic foundational information of ideology and values, it is up to everyone to teach and talk the walk to any kids, friends and relatives that will listen. Otherwise fear of losing ones union, ones govt paycheck, ones Medicaid or welfare program, ones poverty status or ones safety net, will be the single issue combination that totally defeats those who would attempt to get us back on a national footing of independence, monetary sanity and tough love, ie Capitalistic Democracy and Republican Ideology. It is said Americans often can reinvent themselves, the question is can we look at the big picture and just say “NO” to Imperialism and National Socialism? No more single issue pandering to the masses, with the idea assumption that they are to stupid to read the Tea Leaves.

  • chuckb

    the first words out of newts mouth, boehner, mcconnell and he would work together to make great changes. what a team! no thanks!!

  • http://com i41

    When dumbocraps talk compromise, that means the marxist/communists get every thing they want and the others can go suck a rope, and get over it. Compromise for Rebublicans has always been getting nothing and going along, compromise is a sign of poor leadership in any operation.

  • ONTIME

    This Mystery Man is not a qualified president and he is far from any honesty or transparency……….Newt your a great historian but I have seen you back down when you had the gun, you are not made to be president.

  • http://com i41

    ONTIME, I agree with you, that is why we need someone who isn’t a life long beltway smuck. There is too many rino with out any backbone and too many dumbocraps who will do what ever Soros wants done, even if it harms the USA.

  • chuckb

    fox put a nail in newts coffin last night. pelosi and newt agreeing on global warming.

  • TNJan

    We who truly love America had BETTER get it RIGHT this time, and God help us do it, or we WILL NOT get another chance, is my greatest fear. Within two months from now, we should have a much clearer picture of the field. Let us pray and hope it is a good one, from which we can pick a leader who will have the best interests of our (used -to-be) God-fearing nation at heart. VOTE, EVERYONE who is legally able to do so. USE IT OR LOSE IT!! God bless US and help US.

  • chuckb

    romney- wimpy liberal
    huckabee- same
    pawlenty- not conservative
    daniels- liberal
    johnson- doper
    bachman – not enough charisma
    rubio- not enough background
    caine- good but lacks foriegn policy and military exp.
    trump- strong, says it like it is, can’t be sure he’s that conservative
    palin- conservative, draws big crowds, demos hate her, media hates her, successful governor, will beat barry in the debates

    • Cawmun Cents

      Obama-sympathetic to radical muslims,communist radicals,trying to create a false socialistic utopia in the nation we have built with our own sweat and blood…….guaranteeing a better life for people who do not wish to give sweat and blood.Championing redistribution of wealth from people who earned it to people who do nothing.

  • Earl, QUEENS, NY

    And now for an update: I’ve seen on Newsmax (Gingrich Backs Obamacare’s Individual Mandate Requiring Health Insurance; Sunday, 5/15/2011), along with “Gingrich Slams Ryan Plan as ‘Right Wing Social Engineering’” (ibid). So Newt now sounds like another Mitt-nit-wit Romney; oblivious to the fact that mandates are at least one of the reasons Obummer-care was ruled unconstitutional!! I guess it’s now becoming evident that Gingrich is getting senile and losing it. Maybe he’s another Barry Goldwater, who really lost his head in his final retirement years. We really need to find a Reagan/Palin – like solid conservative between now and the 2012 campaign. Although I will vote for any GOP nominee as a vote against the radical leftist BHO, let’s remember that a large % of voters don’t want to vote for the lesser of 2 evils. Thus we should add Newt to the list of candidates who need to be defeated in the primaries.

  • James

    Newt Gingrich cheated on his second wife, while she was on her death bed, and most women voters will never forget that. I agree with everything he says, but I question whether he will, or can, accomplish that. Whoever is the next president is stuck with three wars in the Middle East, a bankrupt United States, 14 million unemployed and 1 in 7 Americans on food stamps. All of the next president’s time will be spent dealing with that.

Bottom
close[X]

Sign Up For Personal Liberty Digest™!

PL Badge

Welcome to PersonalLiberty.com,
America's #1 Source for Libertarian News!

To join our group of freedom-loving individuals and to get alerts as well as late-breaking conservative news from Personal Liberty Digest™...

Privacy PolicyYou can opt out at any time. We protect your information like a mother hen. We will not sell or rent your email address to anyone for any reason.