Gay Marriage Ban Back On Court Agenda In California


Gay marriage ban back on court agenda in California A U.S. District Court in San Francisco has begun hearing a high-profile case in which two gay couples are arguing that the state’s ban on same-sex marriage, known as Proposition 8, is unconstitutional in that it denies them equal protection under the law.

According to legal analysts, Perry v. Schwarzenegger is likely to be fought all the way to the Supreme Court, and its outcome will define the issue of homosexual marriage for years to come, much like Roe vs. Wade settled abortion rights and Brown vs. Board of Education desegregated the nation’s schools.

The suit is supported by the American Foundation for Equal Rights, whose president Chad Griffin said that, contrary to the claims put forward by detractors of same-sex marriage, granting such basic rights would strengthen the fabric of society and affirm the institution of marriage, according to CNN.

"This is one of the threshold civil rights issues of our generation," Griffin said, quoted by the news provider. "Justice is on our side and we’re about to reclaim it."

However, opponents, such as Family Research Council president Tony Perkins, have been quick to point out that efforts to legalize gay marriage have been repeatedly thwarted at the ballot box, most recently when Proposition 8 was upheld by California residents during the 2008 general election.

"The marriage laws of all 50 states would be endangered should this lawsuit succeed," Perkins warned yesterday.

He added, "The plaintiffs are really asking for a wholesale recasting and redefinition of this vital human institution that has been the foundation of civilization’s progress for millennia."

Personal Liberty

Special To Personal Liberty

You Sound Off! is written by our readers and appears the last Wednesday of each month. If you would like to submit an article or letter to the editor for consideration for You Sound Off!, send it to by the Friday before the last Wednesday of the month. To be considered, a submission should be 750 words or less and must include the writer's name, address and a telephone number. Only the writer's name will be published. Anonymous submissions will not be considered.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.