French Report Of Sarin In Syria Increases Prospect Of International Conflict


On Tuesday, French investigators indicated that there was no doubt the Syrian fighters are using deadly sarin gas in the nation, increasing calls from some hawks and liberal humanitarians for U.S. military intervention in the conflict.

French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said he revealed the evidence of chemical warfare in the country to U.N. officials this week.

“These results show the presence of sarin in the samples that are in our possession,” Fabius said. “In view of these elements, France now has the certainty that the sarin gas was used in Syria several times and in a localized manner.”

And in a draft report, the U.N. Human Rights Council notes on its website: “There are reasonable grounds to believe that chemical agents have been used as weapons. The precise agents, delivery systems or perpetrators could not be identified.”

While the presence of chemical warfare agents has been detected in the war-torn country, investigators still have no idea whether they have been used by rebel factions or by the Bashar al-Assad regime.


Responding to the French reports, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said more evidence about the chemical weapons is needed.

“We need to expand the evidence we have,” he told reporters. “We need to make it reviewable; we need to have it corroborated before we make any decisions based on the clear violation that use of chemical weapons would represent by the Syrian regime. So, we will continue in that effort.”

Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice joined the ranks of Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) and other vocal supporters of American involvement in the conflict, saying U.S. intervention is a must.

“Well, there is no doubt that it’s time for the United States to make clear that it is going to engage in this effort to stop the difficult situation in Syria and to prevent its further spread,” she told CBS News. “It’s already spreading across the region. So the United States doesn’t have an option of no action. A no-fly zone is an actual military operation. And the President of the United States is going to have to decide whether he is willing to apply American military power to this conflict. But a no-fly zone is clearly an option.”

For his part, McCain wants to supply Syrian rebels with heavy artillery to aid them in the fight against Assad. But remarks from other international actors, namely Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, make clear that aiding the rebels will put the U.S. in a state of proxy-war with Assad’s allies.

“Any attempts to influence the situation by force through direct military action is doomed to fail and would unavoidably bring about large humanitarian casualties,” Putin said this week.

Russia has previously sold the Syrian regime heavy artillery, such as an S-300 air defense system which Putin said was bought through contract before the conflict. The Russian leader said his country has held off on delivering the weapons to the regime to avoid further destabilizing the region, but intends to do so to dissuade “hotheads” from intervening in the Syrian conflict.

Personal Liberty

Sam Rolley

Sam Rolley began a career in journalism working for a small town newspaper while seeking a B.A. in English. After covering community news and politics, Rolley took a position at Personal Liberty Media Group where could better hone his focus on his true passions: national politics and liberty issues. In his daily columns and reports, Rolley works to help readers understand which lies are perpetuated by the mainstream media and to stay on top of issues ignored by more conventional media outlets.

Join the Discussion

Comment Policy: We encourage an open discussion with a wide range of viewpoints, even extreme ones, but we will not tolerate racism, profanity or slanderous comments toward the author(s) or comment participants. Make your case passionately, but civilly. Please don't stoop to name calling. We use filters for spam protection. If your comment does not appear, it is likely because it violates the above policy or contains links or language typical of spam. We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.

  • elmcqueen3

    I wouldn’t believe anything the French say about anything!

  • BobinCA

    It is clear that there is no proof as to who was using the gas. So nothing has changed and Mr. Obama should maintain his stance on the subject and stand down. Russia has been thought to be one of the countries involved in stopping our secret arms transfer to Syrian rebels that was ongoing when our people were killed in Benghazi. Now McCain wants to light the fuse again by openly supplying more and larger weapons to those same rebels. I think our government should take Russia’s warnings to heart and stay out of Syria and stop interfering in the business of a sovereign nation or face off with Russia and it’s allies, making us possibly responsible for starting WWIII.

  • Adrian Vance

    When they found enough of it to kill 80,000 people in Iraq the Democrats tossed it off as nothing, i.e. “Not a weapon of mass destruction!” What’s different?

    See The Two Minute Conservative via Google or: and when you speak ladies will swoon and liberal gentlemen will weep.